Another Nick Murray Lemon?
#181
Rennlist Member
I hope that he gets this worked out. However, questioning the value of his house should be the last topic for discussion. My wife and I were shocked when we moved from a gated affluent neighborhood in Northeast Atlanta to CT 10 years ago. We were shocked with how much you don't get for you money. Compared to this small house for 1.4 million in Darien, CT, near where we used to live, I'd say Nick got a deal:-) https://www.realtor.com/realestatean...061381&view=qv
Last edited by Ccpecot; 04-14-2019 at 10:52 PM.
#182
SJW, a Carin' kinda guy
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
He donates all the profits (after paying for camera gear) of his YouTube to charities. Sorry for the bad luck with his cars. But remember stout went through something similar with his 991.2 so it happens.
#183
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,322
Received 1,542 Likes
on
1,006 Posts
I did not diagnose root cause with Nick's 991's issues.
I'll go further and, without reparsing my previous posts to be sure, write that
I didn't directly, or specifically speculate on root causes for Nick's cars.
That was never my intention. Certainly, one might, incorrectly, deduce from my posts that I was convinced that aftermarket stuff was the problem. I am not convinced. I wouldn't even offer to bet on the cause without more data.
I did ask two questions: 1) Did Nick have aftermarket stuff (AS) in his 991.2 and 2) was the AS installed by the same shop that did the 991.1. (A better question would have been if it was installed by the same individual.)
The second question has yet to be answered. The first question sparked a discussion of failure modes due, indirectly, to AS and it was in the context of that discussion that I posted The Tome.
I don't know what Nick's 991's issues are. I prefer data before speculating. Before even prioritizing speculation, so as to direct diagnosis tasks, I prefer lots of data. Data are very sparse on the ground here.
Obviously plenty of owners run these items in their cars, but it may be something with the way it has been installed in his car. He had this same setup in his 991.1 which had a lot of issues as well. The contrary is that tons of owners on here have radar detectors and dash cams as well with no issues, so again, I am just speculating.
While it is possible that AS installs on Nick's 991s may be the root causes, unless we know the answer to question number two, (along with a follow-on question of "does this shop/person leave a trail of dead cars behind them?") speculation that AS installs are the root causes should not be given more weight that other possibilities. Everyone is free to form an opinion or not. I have *no* opinion on Nick's issues.
I do have the opinion that not all AS installers are equal. Furthermore, I have the opinion that many of them are ... less than equal. This however doesn't lead me to conclude that Nick's problems are due to the AS installs.
Back to:
This is my question "#2" above.
Would you have approached the installs early on in the diagnosis?
That Big Post and follow-on posts outline in general terms the difficulty technicians face in moderns cars where much of the functionality is software controlled, components are connected on a network and where there's little in the way of "design" or "requirements" information made available to them. And, without the PIWIS laptop, for the time being at least, it's effectively impossible to start a bug hunt on the modern cars unless one has the wherewithal to conduct a lengthy non-trivial (as in expensive) program of reverse engineering.
(As an aside, my track record of ferreting-out ridiculous bugs on 928s has everything to do with available reference material from Porsche, independent publications, and rennlist which I have read, pondered, and put into practice. Obviously, being an engineer by education doesn't hurt, but without insight into the systems I'd just be a monkey with a degree poking pins in a voodoo doll swapping out parts until someone's check book was empty. The latter is, of course, a situation that is depressingly all too common and not just with cars.)
If for some reason I was in Hell and the Devil gave me Nick's 991 (either of them) and didn't give me a PIWIS and didn't give me an internet connection (PIWIS needs it and for the shop manuals and other reference material), I'd probably tell the Devil to FO. No point in starting eternity notwithstanding.
Why would PCNA NOT want to understand the quality, integrity, and performance of the added electronics, and any impact on the car's many faults? Seems like they often take a hard line on lesser issues (i.e. exploding door cards on 991.1, early, unexplained PDK failures, etc.). Why not in this case?
As for 'added electronics' where do you draw the line? On how much random add-on stuff are you willing to expend your company's resources investigating?
I love Nick's videos, and feel he is a Porsche fan, but it seems that Porsche the brand, and the car are getting a bum wrap with some potentially explosive evidence right in front of their eyes.
Second, this old saying applies: You can please some of the people all of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time.
It is inevitable in the conduct of business that you will run across an entity (person, client, company, organization) that you can't please. This might be because, on one extreme, the entity in question by nature can't ever be pleased, or, on the other extreme, that it would cost far too much money to please that entity. For the latter extreme consider: If you run a company with clients in the field, you have (you'd better have!) a Y dollar range you can, for practical purposes, spend on 'field support.' Do you spend 50% of that on one client and leave 50% of your other clients unhappy? Or do you spend 5% on the 'problem' client and the other 95% on the other 99.999% of your clients. Or do you just buy back the product from your 'problem' client? If that's an option.
It's very fair to say you can't answer that question without more details. The devil is in the details. Always.
My *speculation* is that someone or someones at PAG have mounds of data on 'unfindable bugs' and have enacted a policy whereby, depending upon model, after X hours of part swapping, diagnosis, and hair-pulling on an in-warranty Porsche they remove any business process gates from allowing a buy back process to proceed to completion. This policy and the numbers behind it are probably country specific. I do know that, in the past, from time-to-time, PAG has directed a technician to 'remove every computer and send it back to us.' So, from time-to-time, PAG does get interested in actually finding an 'unfindable' bug.
Ocam's Razor indeed??
It isn't clear to me where Occam cuts in this context. There are several 'simple solutions.' Aftermarket Stuff is one. Some folks in this thread have offered others. And in the end, lightening does sometimes strike twice in the same spot.
As the title of my post says, "care to comment"?
#184
Pro
Hey Nick - Many of us really enjoy your channel and I believe several have benefit greatly from all the info you put out about the 911. I know it certainly helped me when I was deciding about my car, and when I was selecting options.
Where else could I go to see a comparison of the headlights intensity - only on your channel.
Where do we go to understand the historical release cycle - your channel.
Where to get opinions on 14 vs 18 ways, on how the base engine feels versus the S, or just to watch someone chase their car as it rolls out the garage - all just on your channel.
It's been a great journey so far - thanks
PS - if you're going to get an EV, get something interesting - like a Rivian.
Where else could I go to see a comparison of the headlights intensity - only on your channel.
Where do we go to understand the historical release cycle - your channel.
Where to get opinions on 14 vs 18 ways, on how the base engine feels versus the S, or just to watch someone chase their car as it rolls out the garage - all just on your channel.
It's been a great journey so far - thanks
PS - if you're going to get an EV, get something interesting - like a Rivian.
#186
Rennlist Member
You know he will be checking the rear wiper option. He cracks me up whenever he would bring it up because he know how many people can't stand it He's a good dude and I enjoy his videos.
#187
Rennlist Member
Then there are all of the PAG and PCNA press cars over the last 20~ years, whether my time in them was short (a track session or a day in the mountains) or longer (1,000-20,000 miles). Among hundreds of cars (cars that are often, sadly, abused by professionals who should know better), I can only think of three real issues: a 987S that let go of its RMS, a 997 GT3 RS with a broken wheel spoke (a journalist took it off track, backwards, and didn't say anything...), and a Panamera that lost its power steering on my watch (victim of a rock or branch that kicked up under the car).
Have been watching Nick's story with interest, as I am somewhat mystified by the fact that lightning struck him twice. We may never know the full story (just as I still don't know the full story on my car), and I am glad he isn't angry at Porsche. I also hope he'll get back into another 911 (or?) at some point...
UPDATE: I decided to order another 991.2 Carrera, and am really glad I did—as it's been at least as reliable as the rest of the Porsches I've had, both new and used. Three years and 22,500 miles in, the only issue so far was minor: The hose from the body to the windshield washer jets on the hood broke and was an easy warranty fix.
Last edited by stout; 06-29-2021 at 01:46 AM. Reason: Update 6/2021
#192
Instructor
so two unsuspecting buyers will get a CPO lemon, and probably are either on here, or will be on here soon asking "why is this leaking, why does this smell, why is there smoke..." Porsche really should have just tossed that first one out the window. Something just was not right with that car... I guess after all is said and done, it's still a business and they probably thought it was "owner's fault" that all this happened.
#193
Someone will come in an call this an awful, distasteful bump. How dare we? How. Dare. We?
Nick Murray knowingly cheated, scammed Porsche, and PCNA. Nick Murray is not an honorable person. All because of the GTS and how awful, just horrible that POS trim is. It's all the GTS's fault.
Nick Murray knowingly cheated, scammed Porsche, and PCNA. Nick Murray is not an honorable person. All because of the GTS and how awful, just horrible that POS trim is. It's all the GTS's fault.
#195
Rennlist Member
Someone will come in an call this an awful, distasteful bump. How dare we? How. Dare. We?
Nick Murray knowingly cheated, scammed Porsche, and PCNA. Nick Murray is not an honorable person. All because of the GTS and how awful, just horrible that POS trim is. It's all the GTS's fault.
Nick Murray knowingly cheated, scammed Porsche, and PCNA. Nick Murray is not an honorable person. All because of the GTS and how awful, just horrible that POS trim is. It's all the GTS's fault.
Last edited by Ceepe; 06-29-2021 at 08:59 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by Ceepe:
apache2 (06-29-2021),
desmotesta (06-29-2021)