Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

If you had $100k: used 991.2 C2S or 997.2 TurboS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-28-2018, 02:01 AM
  #1  
dawgcatching
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
dawgcatching's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Default If you had $100k: used 991.2 C2S or 997.2 TurboS?

I am theorizing here: I now see the used 991.2 C2S prices creeping into the high 90's, which is typically where a nice 997.2 Turbo S sits.

Given that one has 420hp and one 530HP, but that they are very different cars, which would you choose, and why?

Having never driven either car, I would be curious about:

-performance, power delivery, and handling
-reliability
-cost to own (depreciation+maintenance)
-presence (to a Porsche enthusiast/to a non-Porsche enthusiast)

By all accounts, the 991.2 C2S is VERY fast, almost as fast as the Turbo S. I don't really understand how that can be the case, considering the 25%+ increase in power and only 10% difference in weight. The 997 platform (which I am very familiar with) handles differently (some would say sloppily) compared to the more buttoned-down 991 (one only had to watch the 997 cup cars on track with the 991.2 cup and RSR cars at Rennsport through Corkscrew to see how much tighter the newer platforms are). But, I am not sure how different it is on a Carrera vs a Turbo. Like I said; I have never driven either.

Those of you who are cross-shopping these: what have you found? It is crazy to think that a $130k car could have the same performance as a $180k car 5 years prior. That fact probably means the Turbo will depreciate less, but also perhaps that people won't covet the Turbos now that turbos are available at cheaper price points (and similar in performance).
Old 10-28-2018, 02:57 AM
  #2  
evilfij
SJW, a Carin' kinda guy
Rennlist Member
 
evilfij's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On the internet
Posts: 6,786
Received 621 Likes on 433 Posts
Default

I don’t think either will hold value particularly well. A 997.1 6MT turbo (09 cab, low miles, green exterior, natural brown interior, sport seats please) would be my $100k water cooled car.
Old 10-28-2018, 03:57 AM
  #3  
I am the Walrus
Burning Brakes
 
I am the Walrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 865
Received 52 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

I’d hazard a guess that if you managed to drive both cars you would intuitively know which one was a good fit for you. Just a thought

There is a RLer that got a 2011 turbo s from carmax for 83k usd a few months ago. It was speed yellow. In Texas. From what I can recall anyways. Great deal
Glwys

Last edited by I am the Walrus; 10-28-2018 at 06:37 PM. Reason: Carmax not carfax
Old 10-28-2018, 12:55 PM
  #4  
dawgcatching
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
dawgcatching's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by I am the Walrus
I’d hazard a guess that if you managed to drive both cars you would intuitively know which one was a good fit for you. Just a thought

There is a RLer that got a 2011 turbo s from carfax for 83k usd a few months ago. It was speed yellow. In Texas. From what I can recall anyways. Great deal
Glwys
I am not in the market; just curious! Bored last night, browsing cars online. I didn't know the Turbo S was sub $100k now
Old 10-28-2018, 01:52 PM
  #5  
reacher
Burning Brakes
 
reacher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

I had a 997.1TT, and I'd go with the 991.2 every day of the week. It's just such an improved platform, it makes the 997 feel ancient.
Old 10-28-2018, 02:31 PM
  #6  
TorqueChap
Three Wheelin'
 
TorqueChap's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

991.1 = NA

If I had to choose and I was relatively new to Porsche, I'd go NA since it's being quickly phased out.
Old 10-28-2018, 03:01 PM
  #7  
reacher
Burning Brakes
 
reacher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TorqueChap
991.1 = NA

If I had to choose and I was relatively new to Porsche, I'd go NA since it's being quickly phased out.
​​​​​​
I think you missed the point of this thread.
Old 10-28-2018, 03:27 PM
  #8  
Hurricane
Race Car
 
Hurricane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,373
Received 653 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

A lightly used 991.2S or a nine year old car? I would get the 991.2S.

(BTW I was in a similar boat looking at used 997 Turbos years ago and made the same call - I wound up with a 2 year old 7,200 mile C2S and was very happy with it. No regrets.)
Old 10-28-2018, 03:31 PM
  #9  
phefner
Rennlist Member
 
phefner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Look up.
Posts: 1,525
Received 699 Likes on 416 Posts
Default

If those were the ONLY 2, the 991.2 C2S is a great machine and likely has a CPO warrenty option. Both are great..can't really go wrong. As my first Porsche I'd just lean more to the newer C2S, and if so inclined build my garage from there.
,
BUT...IMHO, you may be missing out on a unique opportunity. You can still get a 991.1 with a CPO. The tech is virtually identical to the 991.2s just with a normally asperated power plant. Look around the snow belt states for something that wasn't used in the winter, which will help keep the miles down. A GTS would be a really nice find.
Old 10-28-2018, 03:41 PM
  #10  
flsupraguy
Rennlist Member
 
flsupraguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,670
Received 1,438 Likes on 776 Posts
Default

991.2 If u want manual imho
Old 10-28-2018, 04:45 PM
  #11  
marinb
Rennlist Member
 
marinb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: California
Posts: 357
Received 71 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Only one of those choices can be had as a RWD Turbo. That sealed it for me.
Old 10-28-2018, 04:51 PM
  #12  
Penn4S
Rennlist Member
 
Penn4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 4,668
Received 1,300 Likes on 730 Posts
Default

Have owned a 997 TT. The .2 TTS is an amazing car. If one could find a low mileage well kept version would be a great choice.
Old 10-28-2018, 05:53 PM
  #13  
shing911500e
Instructor
 
shing911500e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Marin, CA
Posts: 142
Received 49 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Ummmm, why not just buy a new Carrera T? That said, the buyer profile for a stripped T (which is what would be needed to hit ~$100k) tends to be substantively different from that of a 997 turboS ..
Old 10-28-2018, 09:47 PM
  #14  
caciquemd
Advanced
 
caciquemd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 71
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

I ended up with a 2017 C2S with 825miles on the clock. One of my colleagues was recommending a 2015 Turbo or Turbo S.

My inital dilemma was T vs. S. I ended up test driving the base, T and and S ( though it was a NA C2S). Never test drove a TT or TTS.

I ended up going for the huge markdown on a CPO C2S and I have no regrets. I don’t know what and even if I’m missing something from the TT or TTS.

I would recommend test drive whatever is in your budget range and what you can live and take your time. I found several cars out of state that were what I was looking for, but ended up buying local because I ended with a great deal.
Old 10-29-2018, 02:46 PM
  #15  
3Series
Three Wheelin'
 
3Series's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dawgcatching
I am theorizing here: I now see the used 991.2 C2S prices creeping into the high 90's, which is typically where a nice 997.2 Turbo S sits.

Given that one has 420hp and one 530HP, but that they are very different cars, which would you choose, and why?

Having never driven either car, I would be curious about:

-performance, power delivery, and handling
-reliability
-cost to own (depreciation+maintenance)
-presence (to a Porsche enthusiast/to a non-Porsche enthusiast)

By all accounts, the 991.2 C2S is VERY fast, almost as fast as the Turbo S. I don't really understand how that can be the case, considering the 25%+ increase in power and only 10% difference in weight. The 997 platform (which I am very familiar with) handles differently (some would say sloppily) compared to the more buttoned-down 991 (one only had to watch the 997 cup cars on track with the 991.2 cup and RSR cars at Rennsport through Corkscrew to see how much tighter the newer platforms are). But, I am not sure how different it is on a Carrera vs a Turbo. Like I said; I have never driven either.

Those of you who are cross-shopping these: what have you found? It is crazy to think that a $130k car could have the same performance as a $180k car 5 years prior. That fact probably means the Turbo will depreciate less, but also perhaps that people won't covet the Turbos now that turbos are available at cheaper price points (and similar in performance).
Weekend/Special car to drive. Turbo S. Daily driver, 991.2 because it's newer.


Quick Reply: If you had $100k: used 991.2 C2S or 997.2 TurboS?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:22 AM.