Anyone dynoed 991?
#16
Rennlist Member
#19
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#21
Rennlist Member
Is variocam engagement software or hardware driven?
I had an S2000 and reducing the VTEC engagement point for high throttle openings gave the car a much healthier midrange.
I had an S2000 and reducing the VTEC engagement point for high throttle openings gave the car a much healthier midrange.
#22
I tend to think dynos don't really say much (way too many variables between dynos, conditions, etc.). If you want to get the truest power output of a car (or how fast it goes), look at its 1/4 mile trap speed + weight. You can even gauge the torque output by the dichotomy between trap speed and time.
#24
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Where aspirations are natural
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes
on
32 Posts
this was my first run:
I’ve yet to see a #2 car hit 1k hp and 700 tq!
#25
Having my car dynoed literally right now!
It’s a 4-wheel dyno, normally used for tuning GTRs, but it’s developed a problem in that the front rollers won’t spin fast enough to get the car up to max power. It’s being looked at now. Will keep you informed!
It’s a 4-wheel dyno, normally used for tuning GTRs, but it’s developed a problem in that the front rollers won’t spin fast enough to get the car up to max power. It’s being looked at now. Will keep you informed!
#27
On a Dynojet without the AWD reading I wouldn’t be surprised if you’d see an extra 10% in power. Some guys say the difference is in fact 15% between the two.
But Stikky said it’ll do 1,000 TQ with a toon! You hear that? It’s a Hellcat whimpering.
Other things to note are that the RPMs were not syncing properly. The only thing this was good for are measuring before after mods. After dyno coming. Also, a mustang dyno reads low, being a AWD dyno compounds low reading.
this was my first run:
I’ve yet to see a #2 car hit 1k hp and 700 tq!
this was my first run:
I’ve yet to see a #2 car hit 1k hp and 700 tq!