is PDCC a must in turbo?
#31
Racer
Both my Macan and TTS have the button showing PDCC. Did Porsche make a mistake on the label?
#32
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: In a van down by the Ottawa River ...
Posts: 4,132
Received 460 Likes
on
257 Posts
I bought it because after I test drove one, I felt the difference...and I liked the outcome.
It's odd that you imply that those who are not invested in it, would be less vocal about it.
What else would you expect exactly, that someone who doesn't have the option would rave about it? Wouldn't that be contradictory to human behavior?
I don't know about you, but when I'm buying a 200K car, I'm not really thinking about spending more or less on options, or trying to justify the expense of the option. If that were the case, I wouldn't be dishing out 200K in the 1st place.
I assume you didn't buy it because you were concerned about the additional expense. That's how your post really reads.
It's odd that you imply that those who are not invested in it, would be less vocal about it.
What else would you expect exactly, that someone who doesn't have the option would rave about it? Wouldn't that be contradictory to human behavior?
I don't know about you, but when I'm buying a 200K car, I'm not really thinking about spending more or less on options, or trying to justify the expense of the option. If that were the case, I wouldn't be dishing out 200K in the 1st place.
I assume you didn't buy it because you were concerned about the additional expense. That's how your post really reads.
Sure... if my words brought you to those conclusions, then it must be true.
#33
Rennlist Member
First example thread from a google search: https://rennlist.com/forums/991/864109-pdcc-button-vs-shock-only-icon.html
#34
I drive my 991.2 TTS on the street with it off, all the time and in all modes. It's simply too stiff.
Haven't done any laps with the 991.2 TTS on track yet, but even then I'm not convinced the tires are good enough for how stiff it makes the suspension and roll control.
-mike
Haven't done any laps with the 991.2 TTS on track yet, but even then I'm not convinced the tires are good enough for how stiff it makes the suspension and roll control.
-mike
I don't have PDCC a/b experience. In the BMW world I would not buy a 5/6/7 without their active-roll system (which works a bit differently). Huge difference. I dislike undocumented software switches, though. I can easily see myself zooming around in Cambridge wanting the suspension soft but body roll at a minimum as I dodge all the obstacles flying into my path left and right as if I am in a video game. Do I even know whether I can get that? Nope.
I am not aware of anybody who tried to separate out PASM and PDCC effects by pulling fuses or plugs, and chances are that the entire suspension goes into failsafe when one component goes possum.
#35
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: West Vancouver and San Francisco
Posts: 4,178
Received 1,139 Likes
on
560 Posts
Damper firmness activated
PDCC (if equipped) response is increased
NOTE: May be disengaged after activated by the Sport or Sports Plus buttons
#36
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: West Vancouver and San Francisco
Posts: 4,178
Received 1,139 Likes
on
560 Posts
On Cayenne, in contrast, both cornering at the limit and comfort in normal driving have an extremely noticeable difference for PDCC vs. no PDCC. I think the higher the center of gravity and the softer the suspension, the more benefit PDCC would offer.
#37
Good grief. I talked to my friend that is a tech at my local Porsche dealership for over 10 years.
He said this, "Yes, definitely there is a noticeable difference when PDCC is on/off specifically for lateral movement. Is it necessary for a TT/TTS, especially if you already have PASM/SPASM? No! However, adding PDCC will help further to minimize lateral body movement by an active anti-roll system. It does not lower or stiffen the ride, it is there to control lateral movement. If you are not driving aggressive around town, you may not notice it as much if you were driving it on track."
He said this, "Yes, definitely there is a noticeable difference when PDCC is on/off specifically for lateral movement. Is it necessary for a TT/TTS, especially if you already have PASM/SPASM? No! However, adding PDCC will help further to minimize lateral body movement by an active anti-roll system. It does not lower or stiffen the ride, it is there to control lateral movement. If you are not driving aggressive around town, you may not notice it as much if you were driving it on track."
#38
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,322
Received 1,542 Likes
on
1,006 Posts
I would have to nod to a comment, that perhaps, those that researched PDDC before back-to-back testing might have suffered from observer bias: My expectations may have affected my observations and conclusion due to my research. But, at this point, I'm a believer in PDDC for crappy-road-DD use and that's my story and I'm sticking to it. I notice a difference when I drive my wife's 981S on the same roads I drive my 991TT. (But, that's still a target for observer bias complaints.)
I apologize, my comments were not intended to make direct aspersions toward anyone's PDDC choices. There are no bad choices!
Quite a few threads have concluded that the PDCC on the button is marketing in action and it is still only the PASM setting that changes. Haven't seen anything official though.
First example thread from a google search: https://rennlist.com/forums/991/8641...only-icon.html
First example thread from a google search: https://rennlist.com/forums/991/8641...only-icon.html
If you corner hard and fast on rough pavement and then go more-slowly over the same patch of corner then the difference is obvious: you'll skip over the pavement when cornering fast, but, when cornering more-sedately stick to the road. And yes, I get to do this test 2.5 times per week.
Nail? Meet coffin.
#39
Burning Brakes
I asked one of the engineers in Germany that developed the system and one of the works drivers who helped test it: On the 991.2 TTS when the PDCC console button is deactivated (light is off), both the PASM and PDCC is put into a "normal/comfort mode" which softens the compression damping of the shocks, adds some rebound damping, and reduces both the front and rear roll stiffness (PDCC). The PDCC is always active, it's mode is altered.
Conversely, when the PDCC console button is activated (light on), the dampers are stiffened by a large amount and the PDCC is put into "performance mode" which severely controls chassis roll depending on other factors (if it thinks you're turning or going over bumps, etc).
I haven't driven a 991.2 TTS with out the PDCC option, but I'd be surprised if it's baseline rollbar settings aren't a little stiffer than the PDCC enabled car (with the PDCC button turned off) to make up for the inability to dynamically control them. Would be interesting to drive them side by side.
As it stands, I still like my 991.2 TTS with the PDCC button turned off for all driving -- cruising and spirited.
-mike
Conversely, when the PDCC console button is activated (light on), the dampers are stiffened by a large amount and the PDCC is put into "performance mode" which severely controls chassis roll depending on other factors (if it thinks you're turning or going over bumps, etc).
I haven't driven a 991.2 TTS with out the PDCC option, but I'd be surprised if it's baseline rollbar settings aren't a little stiffer than the PDCC enabled car (with the PDCC button turned off) to make up for the inability to dynamically control them. Would be interesting to drive them side by side.
As it stands, I still like my 991.2 TTS with the PDCC button turned off for all driving -- cruising and spirited.
-mike