Notices
991 Turbo 2012-2019 Turbo and Turbo S
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Road Spy

991.2 Turbo-- Details Released in 6 Days?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-2015, 11:54 AM
  #61  
Gt3Fan
Racer
 
Gt3Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 466
Received 24 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by williambnj
I was hoping for PDK-S but otherwise looks great!
I don't think the PDK-S matches this car smooth/luxury feel and its powerband. In my GT3, while amazing on the track, was quite jerky driving around town. But who knows, I could be wrong
Old 12-01-2015, 11:59 AM
  #62  
sechsgang
Rennlist Member
 
sechsgang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ...PA...
Posts: 3,941
Received 960 Likes on 455 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gt3Fan
I don't think the PDK-S matches this car smooth/luxury feel and its powerband. In my GT3, while amazing on the track, was quite jerky driving around town. But who knows, I could be wrong
This. Although the RS tune on PDK-S may be an interesting idea for the next GT2 RS...
Old 12-01-2015, 01:42 PM
  #63  
TheGhost
Instructor
 
TheGhost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sdg1871
One car length sounds about right. For stock.

Once you throw a tune onto your 991 turbo or Turbo S it becomes bus lengths:

RedGutz GIAC Stage 2 Plus Defeats Huracan (Round 1) - YouTube
Wow, what a rape.
Old 12-01-2015, 02:35 PM
  #64  
sdg1871
Burning Brakes
 
sdg1871's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New York City
Posts: 827
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheGhost
Wow, what a rape.
The power of GIAC Stage 2+. And this was the early version of the stage 2+ tune. The public version was released yesterday and it is a good bit more powerful. I have since had my Stage 2+ tune upgraded to the public release version. Mine was done about a month ago.

If you like that you will love this

Old 12-01-2015, 02:38 PM
  #65  
sdg1871
Burning Brakes
 
sdg1871's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New York City
Posts: 827
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The New 911
Only a 20 BHP bump in power... "Only". I think that is on the conservative end more so if Porsche wants to keep up with the 488. But then again Porsche with their engineering has time and time again proven that they don't need a ton of power to beat their competitor's.

Guess they are waiting on the next Gen to bring power up to 600BHP.

Also there has to be a point when a company says "Enough". There is a point of diminishing returns moreso if your car isn't properly designed to handle the power.

And again Porsche's Transaxle doesn't loose the power through putting all that BHP to the ground compared to other companies. But that is a discussion for another Post.
I was expecting at least a 40 bhp bump up to 600 bhp especially given the power outputs of the 650s, 488 GTB and Huracan. 20 bhp is a very small bump.

But I will be very interested to see how much power the tuners can wring out out of the bigger turbos in the new Turbo S.
Old 12-01-2015, 05:02 PM
  #66  
worldattorney
Instructor
 
worldattorney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Gt3Fan
I'm in the same boat having just picked up my 2016 a few weeks ago. I do really like that stearing wheel though and may change mine out, as it was the one feature I didn't like on my car(the luxury one) not the sports with the paddles.
I think I could get used to anything after a while but I'm glad to have the Sport Wheel. Going from multi -> sport is the easier conversion I'm told.
Old 12-01-2015, 07:52 PM
  #67  
Gt3Fan
Racer
 
Gt3Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 466
Received 24 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by worldattorney
I think I could get used to anything after a while but I'm glad to have the Sport Wheel. Going from multi -> sport is the easier conversion I'm told.
I'm somewhat used to it, I just miss the better paddle layout of the sports wheel
Old 12-01-2015, 09:06 PM
  #68  
meaker
Three Wheelin'
 
meaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Charlotte,NC
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Looking at the picture of the yellow car. It looks to have a more aggressive stance. Maybe it's the wider rim giving it that look. But looks lower too.

FYI, someone has successfully changed thier gt3 wheel to the newer RS one. There is a thread in the gt3 section.
Old 12-01-2015, 09:09 PM
  #69  
speed21
Banned
 
speed21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,422
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gt3Fan
I'm somewhat used to it, I just miss the better paddle layout of the sports wheel
You really should just pay the ticket for the Techart paddle shift kit. It is the cheaper and better solution by far. You have the best of both worlds and function wise they work and feel exactly the same as the Sports paddles, and make the wheel look much better too. I honestly wouldn't waste another day with the buttons.
Old 12-01-2015, 09:12 PM
  #70  
speed21
Banned
 
speed21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,422
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by worldattorney
I think I could get used to anything after a while but I'm glad to have the Sport Wheel. Going from multi -> sport is the easier conversion I'm told.
Going either way will still cost you the price of changing the electronic hub to match which ever wheel you have plus the cost of the wheel itself. Its not cheap doing it that way when you can get exactly the same result and retain the MF by using the TA paddle kit.

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=p...Imn60G7LFU4%3D
Old 12-01-2015, 10:01 PM
  #71  
The New 911
Pro
 
The New 911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Also when are we going to see this frigen FeFi Porsche has been talking about for the past 18 months? Instead of the Turbo S being the primary competitor for the current mid engined Ferrari's, even though the Turbo S has no problem's competing against the current V8 and even the F12 and FF for that matter!

But I can't wait to see the FeFi and see how they overcome adding more power without adding larger Turbos and/or more boost. Like already mentioned by some it will probably be an integrated Hybrid System while adding a few more cylinders.
Old 12-02-2015, 01:58 AM
  #72  
speed21
Banned
 
speed21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,422
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by meaker
Looking at the picture of the yellow car. It looks to have a more aggressive stance. Maybe it's the wider rim giving it that look. But looks lower too.
.
Going by the technical specs in the new .2 catalog the height of gen 2 is 1mm higher at 1297 vs 1296 on the gen1....so the lower look can only be from the angle in which the photo was taken from. You will also find that once the car is moving it becomes lower anyway due to the down-force being placed upon the shocks.

Also nothing mentioned in the detailed specs and available options about a lower suspension being available either. You do get the lift kit option though which would be handy for those intending to lower with AM springs.

I also note the 0 to 200 for gen 2 tts is now 9.9 vs the .1tts at 10.8 so the car is 1 second faster there.....quite a difference.
Old 12-02-2015, 05:48 AM
  #73  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,327
Received 1,542 Likes on 1,006 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speed21
I also note the 0 to 200 for gen 2 tts is now 9.9 vs the .1tts at 10.8 so the car is 1 second faster there.....quite a difference.
That's not possible from only a 20hp bump. Either there is an error in that data, context mismatch (i.e. .2 TTS w/LC vs .1TT wo/LC) or there are mechanical changes not yet known (would almost have to be gearing) or all three.

An 8.3% time difference is going to need a lot more than a 3.6% power difference.

Nonetheless, 0-200 (kph) is a better benchmark than 0-60 mph.
Old 12-02-2015, 06:15 AM
  #74  
speed21
Banned
 
speed21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,422
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by worf928
That's not possible from only a 20hp bump. Either there is an error in that data, context mismatch (i.e. .2 TTS w/LC vs .1TT wo/LC) or there are mechanical changes not yet known (would almost have to be gearing) or all three.

An 8.3% time difference is going to need a lot more than a 3.6% power difference.

Nonetheless, 0-200 (kph) is a better benchmark than 0-60 mph.
Porsche has never relied on big HP gains to achieve significantly improved accel times. There is also the turbo torque too. Gearing may also be involved. I have no doubt the 0 to 200 gain is legit. The figures are very specific. Note these times are with SC active.
Old 12-02-2015, 06:36 AM
  #75  
TheGhost
Instructor
 
TheGhost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speed21
Porsche has never relied on big HP gains to achieve significantly improved accel times. There is also the turbo torque too. Gearing may also be involved. I have no doubt the 0 to 200 gain is legit. The figures are very specific. Note these times are with SC active.
What is the torque gain for Turbo S?


Quick Reply: 991.2 Turbo-- Details Released in 6 Days?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:05 PM.