991.2 Turbo-- Details Released in 6 Days?
#61
#62
Rennlist Member
This. Although the RS tune on PDK-S may be an interesting idea for the next GT2 RS...
#63
One car length sounds about right. For stock.
Once you throw a tune onto your 991 turbo or Turbo S it becomes bus lengths:
RedGutz GIAC Stage 2 Plus Defeats Huracan (Round 1) - YouTube
Once you throw a tune onto your 991 turbo or Turbo S it becomes bus lengths:
RedGutz GIAC Stage 2 Plus Defeats Huracan (Round 1) - YouTube
#64
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by TheGhost
Wow, what a rape.
If you like that you will love this
#65
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by The New 911
Only a 20 BHP bump in power... "Only". I think that is on the conservative end more so if Porsche wants to keep up with the 488. But then again Porsche with their engineering has time and time again proven that they don't need a ton of power to beat their competitor's.
Guess they are waiting on the next Gen to bring power up to 600BHP.
Also there has to be a point when a company says "Enough". There is a point of diminishing returns moreso if your car isn't properly designed to handle the power.
And again Porsche's Transaxle doesn't loose the power through putting all that BHP to the ground compared to other companies. But that is a discussion for another Post.
Guess they are waiting on the next Gen to bring power up to 600BHP.
Also there has to be a point when a company says "Enough". There is a point of diminishing returns moreso if your car isn't properly designed to handle the power.
And again Porsche's Transaxle doesn't loose the power through putting all that BHP to the ground compared to other companies. But that is a discussion for another Post.
But I will be very interested to see how much power the tuners can wring out out of the bigger turbos in the new Turbo S.
#66
I think I could get used to anything after a while but I'm glad to have the Sport Wheel. Going from multi -> sport is the easier conversion I'm told.
#67
#68
Three Wheelin'
Looking at the picture of the yellow car. It looks to have a more aggressive stance. Maybe it's the wider rim giving it that look. But looks lower too.
FYI, someone has successfully changed thier gt3 wheel to the newer RS one. There is a thread in the gt3 section.
FYI, someone has successfully changed thier gt3 wheel to the newer RS one. There is a thread in the gt3 section.
#69
You really should just pay the ticket for the Techart paddle shift kit. It is the cheaper and better solution by far. You have the best of both worlds and function wise they work and feel exactly the same as the Sports paddles, and make the wheel look much better too. I honestly wouldn't waste another day with the buttons.
#70
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=p...Imn60G7LFU4%3D
#71
Also when are we going to see this frigen FeFi Porsche has been talking about for the past 18 months? Instead of the Turbo S being the primary competitor for the current mid engined Ferrari's, even though the Turbo S has no problem's competing against the current V8 and even the F12 and FF for that matter!
But I can't wait to see the FeFi and see how they overcome adding more power without adding larger Turbos and/or more boost. Like already mentioned by some it will probably be an integrated Hybrid System while adding a few more cylinders.
But I can't wait to see the FeFi and see how they overcome adding more power without adding larger Turbos and/or more boost. Like already mentioned by some it will probably be an integrated Hybrid System while adding a few more cylinders.
#72
Also nothing mentioned in the detailed specs and available options about a lower suspension being available either. You do get the lift kit option though which would be handy for those intending to lower with AM springs.
I also note the 0 to 200 for gen 2 tts is now 9.9 vs the .1tts at 10.8 so the car is 1 second faster there.....quite a difference.
#73
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,327
Received 1,542 Likes
on
1,006 Posts
An 8.3% time difference is going to need a lot more than a 3.6% power difference.
Nonetheless, 0-200 (kph) is a better benchmark than 0-60 mph.
#74
That's not possible from only a 20hp bump. Either there is an error in that data, context mismatch (i.e. .2 TTS w/LC vs .1TT wo/LC) or there are mechanical changes not yet known (would almost have to be gearing) or all three.
An 8.3% time difference is going to need a lot more than a 3.6% power difference.
Nonetheless, 0-200 (kph) is a better benchmark than 0-60 mph.
An 8.3% time difference is going to need a lot more than a 3.6% power difference.
Nonetheless, 0-200 (kph) is a better benchmark than 0-60 mph.
#75
What is the torque gain for Turbo S?