I Stepped Up AGAIN (991.2 Turbo S)
#226
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Metro Atlanta, GA area
Posts: 7,297
Received 2,127 Likes
on
1,342 Posts
So 128-131 seems to be the average stick MPH.
I’ve not yet tried a full 1/4 test from a dig. I’m think my 135-136+ will be close from those rolls. It’s possible it’ll be slightly higher, if I can get a good solid dig launch without too much disruption from cold tires.
Steve Cole - I know you cars 132 and especially that 135 has been debated several times. Were either of those GSP device ot track equipment numbers? i still think 135 is a tad bit of a stretch given stock car power (unless maybe a Huge tail wind). No offense meant. But hey, if it’s legit, then that’s awesome.
As for the progress of the Black 991.2, my car would seem to parallel it, especially if my car responds to the race gas tune with anywhere near 138 to 139 in the quarter.
I’ve not yet tried a full 1/4 test from a dig. I’m think my 135-136+ will be close from those rolls. It’s possible it’ll be slightly higher, if I can get a good solid dig launch without too much disruption from cold tires.
Steve Cole - I know you cars 132 and especially that 135 has been debated several times. Were either of those GSP device ot track equipment numbers? i still think 135 is a tad bit of a stretch given stock car power (unless maybe a Huge tail wind). No offense meant. But hey, if it’s legit, then that’s awesome.
As for the progress of the Black 991.2, my car would seem to parallel it, especially if my car responds to the race gas tune with anywhere near 138 to 139 in the quarter.
#227
So 128-131 seems to be the average stick MPH.
I’ve not yet tried a full 1/4 test from a dig. I’m think my 135-136+ will be close from those rolls. It’s possible it’ll be slightly higher, if I can get a good solid dig launch without too much disruption from cold tires.
Steve Cole - I know you cars 132 and especially that 135 has been debated several times. Were either of those GSP device ot track equipment numbers? i still think 135 is a tad bit of a stretch given stock car power (unless maybe a Huge tail wind). No offense meant. But hey, if it’s legit, then that’s awesome.
As for the progress of the Black 991.2, my car would seem to parallel it, especially if my car responds to the race gas tune with anywhere near 138 to 139 in the quarter.
I’ve not yet tried a full 1/4 test from a dig. I’m think my 135-136+ will be close from those rolls. It’s possible it’ll be slightly higher, if I can get a good solid dig launch without too much disruption from cold tires.
Steve Cole - I know you cars 132 and especially that 135 has been debated several times. Were either of those GSP device ot track equipment numbers? i still think 135 is a tad bit of a stretch given stock car power (unless maybe a Huge tail wind). No offense meant. But hey, if it’s legit, then that’s awesome.
As for the progress of the Black 991.2, my car would seem to parallel it, especially if my car responds to the race gas tune with anywhere near 138 to 139 in the quarter.
The following users liked this post:
Big Swole (01-17-2021)
#228
I remember you and I discussed these runs after I had my original boost leak fixed riiiiight after I got this car. I immediately went out to “test” the repair and this was my 1st pull. I knew boost leak was fixed. The car had full air pressure and was stock right down to the valve caps.
The following users liked this post:
Big Swole (01-17-2021)
#231
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Metro Atlanta, GA area
Posts: 7,297
Received 2,127 Likes
on
1,342 Posts
Wasn’t this the thread with the debate about he 2019’s having the exclusive tune??
Wasn’t vtknight that ran 10.3?
Wasn’t vtknight that ran 10.3?
The following users liked this post:
onfireTTS (01-17-2021)
#232
#234
-1400DA on a prepped track on tires are Hero Runs. I’m guilty of them on other platforms. They are not very helpful or representative. But great for bragging.
Shake the TTS tree on an average day and a good driver on no prep street and a 10.4 at 130 represents.
The following users liked this post:
Big Swole (01-17-2021)
#235
The following users liked this post:
Big Swole (01-17-2021)
#236
Fair enough... I wouldn’t disagree with you. In my opinion, these cars are pretty consistent and predictable. I’ve found that I’m usually fastest if I don’t let the car cool down, just go straight to the run. I’ve found that while it allows the heat soak to go away, so do the heat in the tires, and that’s the secret to making quick consistent passes. Tires hooking vs spinning can make or break you run, whether you’re on the street, or a prepped track.
Exactly !
#237
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Steve Cole - I know you cars 132 and especially that 135 has been debated several times. Were either of those GSP device ot track equipment numbers? i still think 135 is a tad bit of a stretch given stock car power (unless maybe a Huge tail wind). No offense meant. But hey, if it’s legit, then that’s awesome.
__________________
ESMOTOR | DO88 | TPC DSC | SYVECS | COBB | IPD | KLINE | XONA | AMS | ID | ERP | SACHS | TURBOSMART | CSF | DODSON |
ESMOTOR | DO88 | TPC DSC | SYVECS | COBB | IPD | KLINE | XONA | AMS | ID | ERP | SACHS | TURBOSMART | CSF | DODSON |
The following users liked this post:
Big Swole (01-17-2021)
#238
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Metro Atlanta, GA area
Posts: 7,297
Received 2,127 Likes
on
1,342 Posts
Yes, I don’t want to have any hard feelings but even the horsepower calculator puts that 135 at a point far past stock horsepower regardless of how generous Porsche was being.
nevertheless, I’m sure his vehicle is one of the stronger stock vehicles out there and great for him.
nevertheless, I’m sure his vehicle is one of the stronger stock vehicles out there and great for him.
#239
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Metro Atlanta, GA area
Posts: 7,297
Received 2,127 Likes
on
1,342 Posts
Nothing to do with my thread but Brooks just ran his 765LT!!!
These thing just **** me off with how quick / fast they are! LOL
Too flashy of a car for me. I’d rather have a full modded 991.2TTS that goes low 9’s and high 8’s (like my boy Dave Briegs!)
Still, though...... 9.33@150+ mph STOCK!!
These thing just **** me off with how quick / fast they are! LOL
Too flashy of a car for me. I’d rather have a full modded 991.2TTS that goes low 9’s and high 8’s (like my boy Dave Briegs!)
Still, though...... 9.33@150+ mph STOCK!!
The following 3 users liked this post by Big Swole:
#240
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Think BEFORE hitting "Submit Reply"
Posts: 1,263
Received 447 Likes
on
338 Posts
Yes, I don’t want to have any hard feelings but even the horsepower calculator puts that 135 at a point far past stock horsepower regardless of how generous Porsche was being.
nevertheless, I’m sure his vehicle is one of the stronger stock vehicles out there and great for him.
nevertheless, I’m sure his vehicle is one of the stronger stock vehicles out there and great for him.
The following users liked this post:
Big Swole (01-18-2021)