GT3 KSA

Friend shared this earlier today. I told him i think the .2 looks more aggressive but him and others find the .1 more agressive

what do y'all think?

bronson7

I like them both but if I had to make a pick, probably go with .1
Thank you for the pic.

Pokerhobo

.1 has the chin and smiley face on it. .2 definitely more aggressive.

<3mph

Thanks. Do you have photos comparing the rear, especially the wing?

raclaims

I'm always a .1 guy. Weird but true through each iteration

vantage

.2 is more aggressive but .1 is a more cohesive design.

pimpinon

If it was all about looks, the .1 is a stunner. The .2 gets better looking after a few drinks.
Just saying.

Dewinator

I prefer the chin of the .2 but headlights and taillights of .1. I'm undecided about the intakes.

Nick

The .2 is in black. Black hides styling lines.

nxfedlt1

.1 flows much better...i wish the .2 didnt have the hard transition line on the front and rear

signes

+1

BryanCO

.2 is more angular and aggressive.

mqandil

Nick I completely agree. The black color does not show the lines well, so it is really hard to form an opinion until we see the .2 in a lighter color side by side with the .1. Mark

mqandil

As others stated I would be more interested comparing the rear of both cars. I really like the .1 gorgeous tail with the horizontal long ram air intake which reminds me of a Kim kardashian well shaped booty in a ripped jeans Vs the .2 pair of black, ram-style intake scoops which I don't like how they look. The new scoops interrupt the flow of the lines of the car and they look cheap. I would rather have them painted in the same color as the car, but I don't see that as an option in the configurator. I feel the .2 rear looks may be lacking and best described as "Butt implant gone wrong!" Mark

Gauss

Plus the photo is heavily distorted by the wide angle lens