Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991 GT3 Concerned Owners Group

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-22-2017, 09:44 PM
  #331  
Lodi
Burning Brakes
 
Lodi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Milton, GA
Posts: 752
Received 53 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jamie@dundonmotorsports
Things are good, hope you're well also! I believe in the G engines they went with a slightly softer valve spring, but this is only controlling the valve's motion and "flutter" meaning that you need a spring of sufficient spring rate to keep the valve from bouncing off of the seat. Now I can't explain how/why one engine survives and another fails, but I can say that the current design has flaws and those flaws are the major driver of the failures. If those flaws are fixed (maintaining adequate space between the cam and finger follower for an oil film to form) ala a solid lash adjuster, then we believe the issue is no longer one to wonder about.

Since we're talking about lack of oil related wear, there are lots of things that could cause the issue, lots of starts and stops with cold oil, beating on the car when the oil is cold, tracking the car at high temps causing low oil viscosity, etc etc. These are all off the top of my head, I'm sure there are more. But the bottom line is, fix the issue at the source (keep oil between the cam lobe and finger follower) and all the other possible use correlations are no longer concerns.
Thanks for the quick reply Jamie! All makes good sense.
Lodi is offline  
Old 06-23-2017, 05:38 PM
  #332  
Jamie@dundonmotorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Jamie@dundonmotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Gig Harbor, Wa
Posts: 1,943
Received 354 Likes on 197 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vantage
What is the reason Porsche just didn't go with solid lash adjusters in the first place back in 2013? Is it more expensive or is there some other drawback?
Typically solid lash adjusters (or solid lifters) need to be adjusted every so often (think of your old air-cooled needing a valve adjustment...). This creates an additional maintenance requirement and would increase the lifetime emissions of the car (additional oil changes) and when there's already pressure on reducing the vehicles environmental footprint it makes it harder on the OEM to use this solution. They also require a bit more time to build the engine as everything has to be checked for clearances after install typically.

That said, the 991.2 is using a "lifetime" no adjustment necessary solid lash adjuster. It's yet to be seen how long a "lifetime" is... In the press release it was at least 300,000km. Which if it happens that way for every car, that essentially a lifetime of a GT car!

We're doing some simulations and wear testing on our parts to get a good idea of when to schedule the lash adjustment. Most engine builders would suggest checking the clearances on a regular basis (10,000-15,000 miles).
__________________
Dundon Motorsports
Gig Harbor, WA
253-200-4454
jamie@dundonmotorsports.com

www.dundonmotorsports.com
Facebook.com/dundonmotorsports
Instagram @dundon_motorsports
Jamie@dundonmotorsports is offline  
Old 06-23-2017, 07:53 PM
  #333  
bronson7
Nordschleife Master
 
bronson7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,843
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

All interesting info Jamie, much appreciated!
bronson7 is offline  
Old 06-26-2017, 12:30 AM
  #334  
Lodi
Burning Brakes
 
Lodi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Milton, GA
Posts: 752
Received 53 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jamie@dundonmotorsports
Typically solid lash adjusters (or solid lifters) need to be adjusted every so often (think of your old air-cooled needing a valve adjustment...). This creates an additional maintenance requirement and would increase the lifetime emissions of the car (additional oil changes) and when there's already pressure on reducing the vehicles environmental footprint it makes it harder on the OEM to use this solution. They also require a bit more time to build the engine as everything has to be checked for clearances after install typically.

That said, the 991.2 is using a "lifetime" no adjustment necessary solid lash adjuster. It's yet to be seen how long a "lifetime" is... In the press release it was at least 300,000km. Which if it happens that way for every car, that essentially a lifetime of a GT car!

We're doing some simulations and wear testing on our parts to get a good idea of when to schedule the lash adjustment. Most engine builders would suggest checking the clearances on a regular basis (10,000-15,000 miles).
Do you have your solution up and running in your GT3 (forgive me if you've covered this elsewhere)? I assume adjusting the lash involves dropping the engine. How many shop hours do you estimate here?
Lodi is offline  
Old 06-26-2017, 01:49 PM
  #335  
robmypro
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
robmypro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 10,220
Received 1,772 Likes on 1,020 Posts
Default

Update: The meeting is confirmed for August 3rd. I will be contacting members of our delegation shortly to setup a call to go over the meeting agenda.
robmypro is offline  
Old 06-26-2017, 05:07 PM
  #336  
siswati
Intermediate
 
siswati's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 44
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Thanks Rob - appreciate your efforts
siswati is offline  
Old 06-26-2017, 05:45 PM
  #337  
Jamie@dundonmotorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Jamie@dundonmotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Gig Harbor, Wa
Posts: 1,943
Received 354 Likes on 197 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by robmypro
Update: The meeting is confirmed for August 3rd. I will be contacting members of our delegation shortly to setup a call to go over the meeting agenda.
Congrats! Very interested in the outcome!

Originally Posted by Lodi
Do you have your solution up and running in your GT3 (forgive me if you've covered this elsewhere)? I assume adjusting the lash involves dropping the engine. How many shop hours do you estimate here?
The parts are finishing mfg, we expect to have them by beginning of August. Lash specs would be cold... A talented Tech could do it in the car, we will see if we can source the tooling to get it setup to do it in the car, for now assume it's engine out.
Jamie@dundonmotorsports is offline  
Old 06-26-2017, 11:30 PM
  #338  
STG
Race Director
 
STG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 0
Received 193 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jamie@dundonmotorsports
Congrats! Very interested in the outcome!
Seeing you guys are more knowledgeable on this issue than anyone else, aren't you going to be participating in the meeting?

I would think your expertise and opinions would be invaluable for the cause.
STG is offline  
Old 06-26-2017, 11:38 PM
  #339  
Jamie@dundonmotorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Jamie@dundonmotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Gig Harbor, Wa
Posts: 1,943
Received 354 Likes on 197 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by STG
Seeing you guys are more knowledgeable on this issue than anyone else, aren't you going to be participating in the meeting?

I would think your expertise and opinions would be invaluable for the cause.
Aug 3rd is a conflict for me. Want to be there, possibly on conference call? Rob can comment...
Jamie@dundonmotorsports is offline  
Old 06-27-2017, 10:31 AM
  #340  
needmoregarage
Rennlist Member
 
needmoregarage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: SW PA, USA
Posts: 4,123
Received 1,309 Likes on 561 Posts
Default

Is everyone aware of the effort Rob started in support of the Concerned Owner's Group?

Every dollar donated is a "vote" for our cause, and a show of strength to Porsche. And of course it goes to a very worthwhile charity. It's all explained in an articulate first post by Rob:

https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...donations.html

This site has been up for 22 days and we are only at $3053.68 = 61% of the $5000 goal by 42 people (of the over 240 members of the Concerned Owners Group).

In a nutshell - rather than accept money from the group to reimburse delegate travel costs, Rob thought it would be a show of strength for our group to donate money to a worthwhile charity. The hope is to achieve the $5000 goal, and maybe Porsche will provide a matching donation.

Please take a moment to read the thread^, to support Rob and the delegates, and to send a message of strength to Porsche, and of course to do a good thing for people in need.

No donations in the past seven days.
needmoregarage is offline  
Old 06-27-2017, 03:35 PM
  #341  
stronbl
Rennlist Member
 
stronbl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Can you share the meeting agenda with this thread?
stronbl is offline  
Old 06-27-2017, 04:02 PM
  #342  
robmypro
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
robmypro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 10,220
Received 1,772 Likes on 1,020 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stronbl
Can you share the meeting agenda with this thread?
Not at this time, but possibly in the future.
robmypro is offline  
Old 06-29-2017, 07:32 PM
  #343  
needmoregarage
Rennlist Member
 
needmoregarage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: SW PA, USA
Posts: 4,123
Received 1,309 Likes on 561 Posts
Default

Since those reading this thread may not be aware of the other thread....
Here is a post from Rob that every one of the 250+ members of the Concerned Owner's Group should see:
______________________________________________________
Posted by Robmypro:

Thanks! We CAN do this! By my estimate this will cost each member of our delegation $1,500 easy, not including all the hours going into preparing for the meeting. Chipping in a few bucks would be appreciated, as it helps people TRULY in need.

We are definitely going to ask Porsche to make a matching donation, so let's do this people.
______________________________________________________
Originally Posted by needmoregarage:
Still painfully shy of the $5000 goal but at least some have stepped up to donate!

Currrently 51 people have donated $3621.87 which is 72% of the goal.

Hoping more of the 199 remaining concerned owners group members will consider donating for a good cause and show of strength for the group.

Thanks Rob for your efforts, and to all the delegates who are representing the group and paying from their own pocket!
____________________________________

Here is the link to donate:

https://www.justgiving.com/fundraising/991-GT3-COG

Here is the link to the thread Rob created explaining that instead of members donating to offset delegate travel costs - members can donate to a great cause and show Porsche the strength of our resolve:

https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...donations.html
needmoregarage is offline  
Old 06-29-2017, 08:53 PM
  #344  
bronson7
Nordschleife Master
 
bronson7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,843
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by needmoregarage
Since those reading this thread may not be aware of the other thread....
Here is a post from Rob that every one of the 250+ members of the Concerned Owner's Group should see:
______________________________________________________
Posted by Robmypro:

Thanks! We CAN do this! By my estimate this will cost each member of our delegation $1,500 easy, not including all the hours going into preparing for the meeting. Chipping in a few bucks would be appreciated, as it helps people TRULY in need.

We are definitely going to ask Porsche to make a matching donation, so let's do this people.
______________________________________________________
Originally Posted by needmoregarage:
Still painfully shy of the $5000 goal but at least some have stepped up to donate!

Currrently 51 people have donated $3621.87 which is 72% of the goal.

Hoping more of the 199 remaining concerned owners group members will consider donating for a good cause and show of strength for the group.

Thanks Rob for your efforts, and to all the delegates who are representing the group and paying from their own pocket!
____________________________________

Here is the link to donate:

https://www.justgiving.com/fundraising/991-GT3-COG

Here is the link to the thread Rob created explaining that instead of members donating to offset delegate travel costs - members can donate to a great cause and show Porsche the strength of our resolve:

https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...donations.html

Well put Carol, I second this.
Let's hit the target.
bronson7 is offline  
Old 06-30-2017, 08:58 AM
  #345  
hf1
Banned
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,638 Likes on 1,121 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jamie@dundonmotorsports
Things are good, hope you're well also! I believe in the G engines they went with a slightly softer valve spring, but this is only controlling the valve's motion and "flutter" meaning that you need a spring of sufficient spring rate to keep the valve from bouncing off of the seat. Now I can't explain how/why one engine survives and another fails, but I can say that the current design has flaws and those flaws are the major driver of the failures. If those flaws are fixed (maintaining adequate space between the cam and finger follower for an oil film to form) ala a solid lash adjuster, then we believe the issue is no longer one to wonder about.

Since we're talking about lack of oil related wear, there are lots of things that could cause the issue, lots of starts and stops with cold oil, beating on the car when the oil is cold, tracking the car at high temps causing low oil viscosity, etc etc. These are all off the top of my head, I'm sure there are more. But the bottom line is, fix the issue at the source (keep oil between the cam lobe and finger follower) and all the other possible use correlations are no longer concerns.
Is it a fair assumption that .1 RS and the R are also vulnerable to the same problem?

Originally Posted by Jamie@dundonmotorsports
Typically solid lash adjusters (or solid lifters) need to be adjusted every so often (think of your old air-cooled needing a valve adjustment...). This creates an additional maintenance requirement and would increase the lifetime emissions of the car (additional oil changes) and when there's already pressure on reducing the vehicles environmental footprint it makes it harder on the OEM to use this solution. They also require a bit more time to build the engine as everything has to be checked for clearances after install typically.

That said, the 991.2 is using a "lifetime" no adjustment necessary solid lash adjuster. It's yet to be seen how long a "lifetime" is... In the press release it was at least 300,000km. Which if it happens that way for every car, that essentially a lifetime of a GT car!

We're doing some simulations and wear testing on our parts to get a good idea of when to schedule the lash adjustment. Most engine builders would suggest checking the clearances on a regular basis (10,000-15,000 miles).
What would be the ballpark cost (hours labor) for this clearance test?
Kudos for the work you've done on this! Thx.
hf1 is offline  


Quick Reply: 991 GT3 Concerned Owners Group



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:08 PM.