Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

GT3.2 Nordschleife

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-2017, 03:55 PM
  #46  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,748
Received 4,711 Likes on 2,687 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drdonger
I understand your point, but the Ring time is important because it gives people the ability to judge a car's tracking ability. Otherwise if there were no lap times, people would be buying cars based on subjective opinions. We can't even drive most of these GT cars before they are purchased, so it is one of the ways people judge a cars performance.
And the Nordschliefe (unique among race tracks) also implies quite a bit about a car's ability on streets, autobahns, and mountain roads...
Old 04-20-2017, 04:09 PM
  #47  
karimgt3
Pro
 
karimgt3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Typo.. 7:19
Old 04-20-2017, 04:09 PM
  #48  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,958
Received 339 Likes on 208 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
And the Nordschliefe (unique among race tracks) also implies quite a bit about a car's ability on streets, autobahns, and mountain roads...
Originally Posted by drdonger
I understand your point, but the Ring time is important because it gives people the ability to judge a car's tracking ability. Otherwise if there were no lap times, people would be buying cars based on subjective opinions. We can't even drive most of these GT cars before they are purchased, so it is one of the ways people judge a cars performance.
I understand the Ring time has become an industry standard for all manufacturers that are building relevant fast cars,but in most cases,it will remain a bragging argument at the local C&C.
There have been cars in the past built specifically to achieve great numbers at the Ring and absolutely sucked on the road. My memory is not helping me at the moment to give you an example,but I'm sure someone here will.
Also,will you not buy the car if 7:29 is the correct time? Hell,cheaper 911s did better. AMG GT-R did 7:10,but I wouldn't personally buy that car over the GT3. And I love AMG!
Old 04-20-2017, 04:15 PM
  #49  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,748
Received 4,711 Likes on 2,687 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neanicu
Also,will you not buy the car if 7:29 is the correct time? Hell,cheaper 911s did better.
Yes, I will buy the car anyway. But, it doesn't stop me from being interested at why it should be 4 seconds slower than 991.1 GT3 when it outdoes that car with more power and torque (at every rpm), 20% more downforce, sticker tires, racier brake pads, improved tuning for front and rear wheel steering, and evolved suspension, while maintaining the same redline, gearing, aero drag, and weight.
Old 04-20-2017, 04:38 PM
  #50  
robmypro
Race Director
 
robmypro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 10,220
Received 1,772 Likes on 1,020 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
Yes, I will buy the car anyway. But, it doesn't stop me from being interested at why it should be 4 seconds slower than 991.1 GT3 when it outdoes that car with more power and torque (at every rpm), 20% more downforce, sticker tires, racier brake pads, improved tuning for front and rear wheel steering, and evolved suspension, while maintaining the same redline, gearing, aero drag, and weight.
The magic all happened with the 991.1 top end.
Old 04-20-2017, 04:43 PM
  #51  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,958
Received 339 Likes on 208 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
But, it doesn't stop me from being interested at why it should be 4 seconds slower than 991.1 GT3 when it outdoes that car with more power and torque (at every rpm), 20% more downforce, sticker tires, racier brake pads, improved tuning for front and rear wheel steering, and evolved suspension, while maintaining the same redline, gearing, aero drag, and weight.
Because it is not. This number is obviously wrong. Porsche has never released a new car slower than its predecessor. I knew that from the beginning. So what's left to discuss besides why is this Ring number so relevant...
Old 04-20-2017, 04:56 PM
  #52  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,748
Received 4,711 Likes on 2,687 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neanicu
Porsche has never released a new car slower than its predecessor.
You must be too young to remember 1974
Old 04-20-2017, 04:59 PM
  #53  
drdonger
Three Wheelin'
 
drdonger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,751
Received 39 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neanicu
I understand the Ring time has become an industry standard for all manufacturers that are building relevant fast cars,but in most cases,it will remain a bragging argument at the local C&C.
There have been cars in the past built specifically to achieve great numbers at the Ring and absolutely sucked on the road. My memory is not helping me at the moment to give you an example,but I'm sure someone here will.
Also,will you not buy the car if 7:29 is the correct time? Hell,cheaper 911s did better. AMG GT-R did 7:10,but I wouldn't personally buy that car over the GT3. And I love AMG!
I'm not saying that is why I would buy a car based on ring times, just saying its a good gauge for potential buyers in addition to other factors. I will be getting a 991.2 GT3 in stick
Old 04-20-2017, 05:01 PM
  #54  
robmypro
Race Director
 
robmypro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 10,220
Received 1,772 Likes on 1,020 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drdonger
I'm not saying that is why I would buy a car based on ring times, just saying its a good gauge for potential buyers in addition to other factors. I will be getting a 991.2 GT3 in stick
It's just another data point.
Old 04-20-2017, 05:03 PM
  #55  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,958
Received 339 Likes on 208 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
You must be too young to remember 1974
Definitely!
Old 04-20-2017, 05:03 PM
  #56  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,958
Received 339 Likes on 208 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drdonger
I'm not saying that is why I would buy a car based on ring times, just saying its a good gauge for potential buyers in addition to other factors. I will be getting a 991.2 GT3 in stick
Congrats,you're gonna love it!
Old 04-20-2017, 05:13 PM
  #57  
EST
Pro
 
EST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neanicu
Because it is not. This number is obviously wrong. Porsche has never released a new car slower than its predecessor. I knew that from the beginning. So what's left to discuss besides why is this Ring number so relevant...
I think you are both wrong because the official Ring number for 991.1 GT3 was 7:30
Here's some Ring numbers from articles published by Porsche.
997 GT3 RS 4.0 time 7:27
997 GT2 RS time 7:18
991 GT3 3.8 time 7:30 (7:29)
991 GT3 RS 4.0 time 7:20

So if the new 991.2 GT3 doing 7:27 I think it's fine
Old 04-20-2017, 05:16 PM
  #58  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,748
Received 4,711 Likes on 2,687 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EST
I think you are both wrong because the official Ring number for 991.1 GT3 was 7:30
Here's some Ring numbers from articles published by Porsche.
997 GT3 RS 4.0 time 7:27
997 GT2 RS time 7:18
991 GT3 3.8 time 7:30 (7:29)
991 GT3 RS 4.0 time 7:20

So if the new 991.2 GT3 doing 7:27 I think it's fine
About the 2014 GT3:

"Porsche claims the new car has already successfully lapped the Nürburgring in 7:25, 15 seconds faster than the last 911 GT3"

http://autoweek.com/article/car-revi...-gets-reloaded

And here (Timo Kluk, 7:25):
http://fastestlaps.com/models/porsche-911-gt3-991
Old 04-20-2017, 05:21 PM
  #59  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,958
Received 339 Likes on 208 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
About the 2014 GT3:

"Porsche claims the new car has already successfully lapped the Nürburgring in 7:25, 15 seconds faster than the last 911 GT3"

http://autoweek.com/article/car-revi...-gets-reloaded

And here (Timo Kluk, 7:25):
http://fastestlaps.com/models/porsche-911-gt3-991
That's what I thought too : 7:25 was the last one...
Old 04-20-2017, 05:30 PM
  #60  
Kills Bugs Fast
Advanced
 
Kills Bugs Fast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: London
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

“It’s not our mainstream program to have the quickest lap times and to advertise our cars only by lap time because, to be honest with you, if you have a car with the perfect setup for the Nurburgring, it will be a dog on the street and everywhere else.” - AP

inverse advertising - this advert shows how good the car is on the street according to AP comments...

http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2...lap-times.html


Quick Reply: GT3.2 Nordschleife



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:01 AM.