Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991.2 GT3 what they should do better

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2017, 10:55 AM
  #31  
DRPM
Drifting
 
DRPM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: QC, CA / Abaco BS
Posts: 2,300
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Subscribed
Will comment post ED delivery with triPedal Version
Old 03-11-2017, 11:21 AM
  #32  
Kobalt
Race Car
 
Kobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 4,848
Received 418 Likes on 197 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nizer
As the street-oriented option current GT3 is fine as it is with exception of no single-mass flywheel.

Next RS wish-list on the other hand includes:

- 997.1 Clubsport seats
- Rollbar
- Radio delete
- A/C delete
- Cup dash/console w/Motec readout
- Lion Battery
- Side-muffler delete
- Adj ABS
- Mg wheel option
- Stiffer Ti spring option
- Wider front tires
- 4.2L 550hp
+1 But I'd keep the A/C
Old 03-11-2017, 08:39 PM
  #33  
ChicagoM4
Instructor
 
ChicagoM4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 246
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fxz
1) rear air scoops made in too poor plastic for a close to 200k car
According to the Porsche website, the ram air scoops are Carbon Fiber
Old 03-11-2017, 08:46 PM
  #34  
fxz
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
fxz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The way to hell is paved by good intentions “Wenn ich Purist höre...entsichere ich meinen Browning” "Myths are fuel for marketing (and nowadays for flippers too,,,)" time to time is not sufficient to be a saint, you must be also an Hero
Posts: 4,446
Received 422 Likes on 250 Posts
Default

and where s the fiber ? painted with a cheap plastic coating?
Old 03-11-2017, 08:49 PM
  #35  
Drifting
Rennlist Member
 
Drifting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 5,024
Received 1,188 Likes on 631 Posts
Default

Agree if they are carbon fiber they should look like carbon fiber.
Old 03-11-2017, 09:33 PM
  #36  
bronson7
Nordschleife Master
 
bronson7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,843
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChicagoM4
According to the Porsche website, the ram air scoops are Carbon Fiber
I'd love to believe this but not according to the pics I saw.
Old 03-12-2017, 12:19 AM
  #37  
Drifting
Rennlist Member
 
Drifting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 5,024
Received 1,188 Likes on 631 Posts
Default

the porsche website (and configurator descriptions) are incorrect more often than they should be for the car company with the highest average profit per car in the world.

Jeez, you'd think they could afford to pay the right people to ensure their online information was always correct.
Old 03-12-2017, 01:22 AM
  #38  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,347
Likes: 0
Received 10,781 Likes on 4,774 Posts
Default

Larger PDK shift paddles, and if I'm allowed to be greedy, larger column-mounted PDK shift paddles
Old 03-12-2017, 01:24 AM
  #39  
CAlexio
Race Director
 
CAlexio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hypercar Invitational
Posts: 10,232
Received 1,963 Likes on 915 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jrtaylor9
1. LWFW
2. LWFW
3. LWFW

if I were going to get in manual, LWFW such an upgrade to the driving experience. and now AP says no R LWFW upgrade or engine ka-boom. That's disappointing. Other than that seems like they nailed it so far. I'd prob do pdk anyway but still a disappointment for no option.
Before i drove an R with LWFW, I assumed this was a huge issue. Having spent 2 full days in one, I would say that not having it is not the end of the world, allow me to explain....

On forums, there is a lot of theory... which leads to a lot of imagined hyperbole... little things get built up to be really huge things. Take this example where many of us non-R owners have talked about the LWFW like it's some holy grail.. because scarcity and unachievability lead us to believe its so. my humble opinion is that while it's interesting to hear the chunter of a rattling flywheel, it's a mild sound which you can take or leave. Additionally, while the engine revs more freely with the LWFW, its very possible that the non-hydraulic valvetrain of the new GT3 engine MAY feel equally as peppy.. or "snappy" as AP says due to the reduced internal friction... which negate any loss of liveliness from no LWFW.

All things considered, I would put money on the fact that the new 4.0 with the new internals, may feel more exciting than the "old" on the R with the LWFW.

I'm going to say something controversial or unpopular? We did some nice pulls in the R today.. and the top end surge is notTHAT impressive. I know everyone is bowing down to the R god, but I've had the fortune of driving a lot of impressive sports cars in my life on road and on track, so I think I can confidently say that the top end of this engine is not really anything to write home about. In RS guise, the grip of the front end on the track blows you away, and the speed of the PDK-s shifts amazes...and In the R guise, the wonderful sound and mechanical sensation is definitely special. But it's not the best top end.. it doesn't blow your mind like a v12 Ferrari does. On the other hand, i think this new 4.0 will really impress from 6-9k rpm (based on AP's interview with Pistonheads).. even, without a LWFW.

These are all suppositions and hunches on my part, not meaning to detract from the obsequious and almost fanatic compliments that the R and its LWFW has garnered thus far. I'm about to spend another week and an easy 1-2000 miles with this car, so maybe I'll lose my mind over it like everyone else has. But for now I'll venture that this is not the end all-be all which it has been made out to be. (Although if I had ONE car to own for the rest of my life.. it would be hard to beat a manual high revving 911). Let's just trust the Porsche is always improving, and that a new engine with a dual mass flywheel might be even more exciting?

Sorry if I insulted anyone's god.. I'll finish this overly verbose post by saying that of the multiple 1000hp+ cars and special editions I've road driven and tracked.. a manual 911 with a lofty tach would still be my choice... it's just that the pinnacle may still be forthcoming... and other factors outside of a LWFW could still improve the experience.
Old 03-12-2017, 01:29 AM
  #40  
Drifting
Rennlist Member
 
Drifting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 5,024
Received 1,188 Likes on 631 Posts
Default

Nice prose Alex!

I'm sure that driving your incoming manual .2 GT3 will be an ethereal experience.
Old 03-12-2017, 03:09 AM
  #41  
bronson7
Nordschleife Master
 
bronson7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,843
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Alex, thank you for your thoughts. Interesting comments on the LWFW vs the dual mass flywheel.
Old 03-12-2017, 09:29 AM
  #42  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 810 Likes on 424 Posts
Default

Some are obsequious to R. Some here obsequious to RS. Some here obsequious to GT3. Nearly all here obsequious to PAG.
Old 03-12-2017, 09:43 AM
  #43  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 810 Likes on 424 Posts
Default

Does anyone have info on where the new 4.0L makes it's power in the rpm range?
Old 03-12-2017, 10:24 AM
  #44  
Kobalt
Race Car
 
Kobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 4,848
Received 418 Likes on 197 Posts
Default

http://files1.porsche.com/filestore/...T3-Katalog.pdf


Name:  photo254.jpg
Views: 589
Size:  501.2 KB
Old 03-12-2017, 10:43 AM
  #45  
dark knight
Rennlist Member
 
dark knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Support our troops! go USA!!!
Posts: 2,223
Received 46 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

i would like a center console mounted parking brake


Quick Reply: 991.2 GT3 what they should do better



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:09 AM.