Next RS to get 518 bhp and 4.2 litre engine
#1
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
#3
#5
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
What kind of reporting is that? They mention a "Bored-Out" motor and then go on to say how the displacement was achieved with a longer stroke...
"Porsche is reportedly developing a more powerful version of the 911 GT3 RS, with a bored-out version of its rear-mounted engine rumoured to be capable of producing 518bhp.
The 4.0-litre engine of the current RS runs a 102x81.5mm bore and stroke, making it the largest six-cylinder boxer to make production. But insiders are now claiming the engine in a more potent RS would be 4.2 litres in capacity, pushing the engine’s stroke up to 85.1mm."
This stroke change alone would give about 4.176 Liter (doubt there is any change to bore).
And then they came to the conclusion that such a motor would make 518hp because the non-DFI Ruf makes that much?
"Porsche is reportedly developing a more powerful version of the 911 GT3 RS, with a bored-out version of its rear-mounted engine rumoured to be capable of producing 518bhp.
The 4.0-litre engine of the current RS runs a 102x81.5mm bore and stroke, making it the largest six-cylinder boxer to make production. But insiders are now claiming the engine in a more potent RS would be 4.2 litres in capacity, pushing the engine’s stroke up to 85.1mm."
This stroke change alone would give about 4.176 Liter (doubt there is any change to bore).
And then they came to the conclusion that such a motor would make 518hp because the non-DFI Ruf makes that much?
#7
Race Car
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The way to hell is paved by good intentions “Wenn ich Purist höre...entsichere ich meinen Browning” "Myths are fuel for marketing (and nowadays for flippers too,,,)" time to time is not sufficient to be a saint, you must be also an Hero
Posts: 4,486
Received 441 Likes
on
263 Posts
To get real for a second..................................
There is no chance in HELL that Porsche would test and allow spy shots to be taken of a new 991.2 RS while the .1's are still rolling off the assembly line and still will be for 4 more months. NO CHANCE!!!
That car is a turbo, only question is, is it a GT2 or GT2 RS?
thats it!
Anyone want to bet???
There is no chance in HELL that Porsche would test and allow spy shots to be taken of a new 991.2 RS while the .1's are still rolling off the assembly line and still will be for 4 more months. NO CHANCE!!!
That car is a turbo, only question is, is it a GT2 or GT2 RS?
thats it!
Anyone want to bet???
Trending Topics
#8
Drifting
What kind of reporting is that? They mention a "Bored-Out" motor and then go on to say how the displacement was achieved with a longer stroke...
"Porsche is reportedly developing a more powerful version of the 911 GT3 RS, with a bored-out version of its rear-mounted engine rumoured to be capable of producing 518bhp.
The 4.0-litre engine of the current RS runs a 102x81.5mm bore and stroke, making it the largest six-cylinder boxer to make production. But insiders are now claiming the engine in a more potent RS would be 4.2 litres in capacity, pushing the engine’s stroke up to 85.1mm."
This stroke change alone would give about 4.176 Liter (doubt there is any change to bore).
And then they came to the conclusion that such a motor would make 518hp because the non-DFI Ruf makes that much?
"Porsche is reportedly developing a more powerful version of the 911 GT3 RS, with a bored-out version of its rear-mounted engine rumoured to be capable of producing 518bhp.
The 4.0-litre engine of the current RS runs a 102x81.5mm bore and stroke, making it the largest six-cylinder boxer to make production. But insiders are now claiming the engine in a more potent RS would be 4.2 litres in capacity, pushing the engine’s stroke up to 85.1mm."
This stroke change alone would give about 4.176 Liter (doubt there is any change to bore).
And then they came to the conclusion that such a motor would make 518hp because the non-DFI Ruf makes that much?
Fabricated article cobbled together with circumstantial evidence only.
People on here are more credible...
#12
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Love it!
#13
That reporting is for gullible people to fall for!
#15
Drifting
It's not a Frankel article, after all.
Convinced there's a lot of misdirection going on now...
I'll be very disappointed if they give us a warmed over 991.2. Time for turbo; I wish IMSA and WEC would take away BOP and force them to compete with the other OEMs on the basis of their actual product.
Convinced there's a lot of misdirection going on now...
I'll be very disappointed if they give us a warmed over 991.2. Time for turbo; I wish IMSA and WEC would take away BOP and force them to compete with the other OEMs on the basis of their actual product.