Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991 GT2RS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-2017, 10:26 AM
  #1306  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,514
Received 1,722 Likes on 913 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Petevb
I'm curious what you were expecting, or better what you'd prefer?

Porsche abandoned the hp war long ago. While other manufactures are giving customers ever cheaper power, Porsche generally refuses to:

The GT2 RS has been the lone exception, and indeed if the quoted numbers are correct we're looking at a new point around 467 hp per ton and 280-320k on this graph, far above the trend line (like the old GT2 RS):

Where Porsche have tried to compete, on the other hand, is setup and lap time. Many on paper much lighter and more powerful rivals have fallen short when measured against the clock- put the 918s stats next to the P1s and La Ferrari's, for example. Porsche will try a similar trick again, and I'd bet on them to succeed.

I read "under 7 minutes, we haven't tested it yet or finalized the specs" as Porsche code for "we're beating the 918, we're not sure about the Peformante yet". So we'll have another 911 (not a supercar remember) taking supercar scalps and then going for lunch. Which is long as it has been.

Given this I'm genuinely curious what you feel Porsche should do to make it more special. Manual transmission? More power to keep up with the HP arms race? Shorter wheelbase? Carbon chassis (at which point it's not a 911)?

I'm a manual fan and I'd like the option in principle. I'll admit however that if I had the money for this thing I'd think very hard before ticking a MT box. My experience with GT2s is that they are "both hands on the wheel" kind of cars...
Agreed. Primary wish on my part would be less weight but they're clearly working hard to keep it down so I guess turbos and extra plumping really add up.

Originally Posted by Kobalt
Went to bed then woke up finding that internet exploded...

Fully rose-jointed: Wonder what the service intervall will be - I have no experience of stuff like that.
Not much of an issue based on my fully rose-jointed 997.2 RS.

That doesn't sound too bad.

Originally Posted by jo_ker
Yes, you can still delete the a/c, radio and infotainment, but nobody will.
Wrong.

Now just need to find a way to get that Ti rollbar...

Originally Posted by Metzeger
I hope the weissach package go for the gt3.2 RS
I'd bet money it will be an option.

Anyone else catch the spring rate comment? Double that of 3 RS up front!!

Last edited by Nizer; 06-04-2017 at 11:14 AM.
Old 06-04-2017, 10:38 AM
  #1307  
C.J. Ichiban
Platinum Dealership
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
C.J. Ichiban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Exit Row seats
Posts: 9,738
Received 1,954 Likes on 555 Posts
Default

The Porsche will always have a traction advantage with 265/325 tires...the Ferrari's and McLarens never have that much.

But what is interesting to me is that there will definitely be a 100+ KG advantage for the McLaren, and how that will play out.

Having just driven the 720S I will say that the car is incredible and will humble a lot of people. This next generation of in between super/hyper cars is going to be very very impressive behind the wheel.

From what I am reading in between the lines on the GT2RS it will have canards on the front bumper to help with wheelie prevention. I am also disappointed that they are not "pulling out all the sound deadening" but I guess my shop can do that. If I am forking it out for a super race car lap record machine I don't need 20kg of foam throughout the car.
Old 06-04-2017, 10:53 AM
  #1308  
Footsoldier
Burning Brakes
 
Footsoldier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 999
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C.J. Ichiban
The Porsche will always have a traction advantage with 265/325 tires...the Ferrari's and McLarens never have that much.

But what is interesting to me is that there will definitely be a 100+ KG advantage for the McLaren, and how that will play out.

Having just driven the 720S I will say that the car is incredible and will humble a lot of people. This next generation of in between super/hyper cars is going to be very very impressive behind the wheel.

From what I am reading in between the lines on the GT2RS it will have canards on the front bumper to help with wheelie prevention. I am also disappointed that they are not "pulling out all the sound deadening" but I guess my shop can do that. If I am forking it out for a super race car lap record machine I don't need 20kg of foam throughout the car.
I'd be surprised if Weissach option doesn't include stripping out some of the sound deadening. The 918 W pack meant both thinner glass and sound deadening removed, along with default AC/Radio delete However, if you added back in the Burmester, the sound deadening was automatically added back to make acoustics work. (Think that was a Burmester stipulation)

Also WP came with Mg wheels, so I'm guessing the magazines are missing spec nuances.
Old 06-04-2017, 11:45 AM
  #1309  
isv
Pro
 
isv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Petevb
The GT2 RS has been the lone exception, and indeed if the quoted numbers are correct we're looking at a new point around 467 hp per ton and 280-320k on this graph, far above the trend line (like the old GT2 RS):



Where Porsche have tried to compete, on the other hand, is setup and lap time. Many on paper much lighter and more powerful rivals have fallen short when measured against the clock- put the 918s stats next to the P1s and La Ferrari's, for example. Porsche will try a similar trick again, and I'd bet on them to succeed.

I read "under 7 minutes, we haven't tested it yet or finalized the specs" as Porsche code for "we're beating the 918, we're not sure about the Peformante yet". So we'll have another 911 (not a supercar remember) taking supercar scalps and then going for lunch. Which is long as it has been.

Given this I'm genuinely curious what you feel Porsche should do to make it more special. Manual transmission? More power to keep up with the HP arms race? Shorter wheelbase? Carbon chassis (at which point it's not a 911)?
Every car on your graph though is a NA car, 918 apart obviously. If you only plotted all the turbo cars (996 gt2, 997 gt2, various turbo s etc) does the gt2 rs really still seem like such an outlier?

I can't answer for Drifting but I can see why he thinks the way he does about the lack of 'specialness' of the car outside of a potential limited edition plaque at the projected price point. As things stand, the gt2rs looks designed to be a lap time monster little to no different from most of the rest of compeition ie turbo, lots of power, loads of electronics, dual clutch, heavy. Despite the rose joints, I expect the car to be still designed primarily as a road car - just as the 488/720/675 type cars. Certainly I'd expect well over 90% of cars to be specced with leather interior, sat nav, upgraded sound etc...
Old 06-04-2017, 11:59 AM
  #1310  
Petevb
Rennlist Member
 
Petevb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,728
Received 704 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by isv
Every car on your graph though is a NA car, 918 apart obviously. If you only plotted all the turbo cars (996 gt2, 997 gt2, various turbo s etc) does the gt2 rs really still seem like such an outlier?
This was about a year and a half ago, but every Turbo model on sale at that time was included (the dots just to the right and left of the GT3 RS are the Turbo and Turbo S).

You can see the data points in this older version of the graph, as well as the previous GT3 RS which was the previous biggest outlier:



Old 06-04-2017, 11:59 AM
  #1311  
JonA85
Racer
 
JonA85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Shmee150 is saying 700hp, 1000 units, October release.
Attached Images  
Old 06-04-2017, 11:59 AM
  #1312  
JPMD
Rennlist Member
 
JPMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 922
Received 138 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

What were the torque limits of the PDK? Sorry if I missed it was the transmission modified for the GT2RS.

What car currently has the highest torque dual clutch transmission?
Old 06-04-2017, 12:21 PM
  #1313  
porscharu
Pro
 
porscharu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by drdonger
3300lbs is not impressive. It should be the same weight as the GT3 RS and 700 hp.
Have you ever held a turbo in your hand? Where exactly should they shed the additional 80-100lb's from? This is easier said than done.
Old 06-04-2017, 12:40 PM
  #1314  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,758
Received 4,719 Likes on 2,690 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JPMD
What car currently has the highest torque dual clutch transmission?
Bugatti Chiron maybe (1,500 hp and 1,200 ft-lbs) - more than double GT2RS...
Old 06-04-2017, 12:42 PM
  #1315  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,758
Received 4,719 Likes on 2,690 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by porscharu
Have you ever held a turbo in your hand? Where exactly should they shed the additional 80-100lb's from? This is easier said than done.
Not to mention intercoolers, extra plumbing, blow-off valves, cooling, etc...
Old 06-04-2017, 01:26 PM
  #1316  
vantage
Three Wheelin'
 
vantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,846
Received 169 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

Rose jointed, very cool! Bring back the feel.

Not sure about why Pccb needs air ducts. Maybe the normal brake ducts are covered by radiators.
Old 06-04-2017, 01:44 PM
  #1317  
C.J. Ichiban
Platinum Dealership
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
C.J. Ichiban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Exit Row seats
Posts: 9,738
Received 1,954 Likes on 555 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
Bugatti Chiron maybe (1,500 hp and 1,200 ft-lbs) - more than double GT2RS...
Beat me to it...

PDK is NOT TORQUE LIMITED. 918 has 900+ ft lbs!!!
Old 06-04-2017, 02:05 PM
  #1318  
laranja
Pro
 
laranja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 650
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

I really hope the car in the vids
really is a "prototype" because
the *** with
the circular vents in the rear
bumper looks atrocious to me.

Cheap bolt on hack is
what I think when I see the
rear.
Old 06-04-2017, 02:12 PM
  #1319  
Needsdecaf
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Needsdecaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Woodlands, TX.
Posts: 8,822
Received 2,527 Likes on 1,574 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by laranja
I really hope the car in the vids
really is a "prototype" because
the *** with
the circular vents in the rear
bumper looks atrocious to me.

Cheap bolt on hack is
what I think when I see the
rear.
It's a prototype with camo. You really think they are going to let the final car out in the public before it's official reveal?
Old 06-04-2017, 02:24 PM
  #1320  
Drifting
Rennlist Member
 
Drifting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 5,024
Received 1,188 Likes on 631 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by isv
I can't answer for Drifting but I can see why he thinks the way he does about the lack of 'specialness' of the car outside of a potential limited edition plaque at the projected price point. As things stand, the gt2rs looks designed to be a lap time monster little to no different from most of the rest of compeition ie turbo, lots of power, loads of electronics, dual clutch, heavy. Despite the rose joints, I expect the car to be still designed primarily as a road car - just as the 488/720/675 type cars.
You get me. At this price point and with those specs, the 991 GT2RS isn't that special compared to the 488 and 720, and although it looks to be a limited edition, so will be the run of the 488 Speciale and "745LT". Mechanically, there isn't anything particularly special about the GT2RS compared to the other two cars.

Originally Posted by Petevb
I'm curious what you were expecting, or better what you'd prefer?
Given this I'm genuinely curious what you feel Porsche should do to make it more special. Manual transmission? More power to keep up with the HP arms race? Shorter wheelbase? Carbon chassis (at which point it's not a 911)?

I'm a manual fan and I'd like the option in principle. I'll admit however that if I had the money for this thing I'd think very hard before ticking a MT box. My experience with GT2s is that they are "both hands on the wheel" kind of cars...
Pete, my issue is that when the previous 997 GT2RS came out it was very different from the competition. It was light, manual, short wheelbase, high power turbo car, and was a unique experience to drive compared to the Ferrari 458, Lambos, etc, which were NA, long wheelbase, DCT

Now the GT2RS is basically the same as the competition.

I agree with you that I'd like there to be a manual option in principle, although I also agree with 700HP to rear wheels only, PDK-S is likely the safest option, but then again part of the previous mystique of the GT2RS was that driving it was a bit like being a lion tamer.
Anyway, to answer your question I'd like the 991 GT2RS to be more special compared to other 991 turbos and more differentiated from the competition, either by insane power for this limited run of GT2RS, like 800hp, or major weight reduction, like a carbon tub to drop the weight down to 3000 lbs.

The GT2RS still sounds like a great car, and I don't want to take away from that for the future owners on this thread, its just that the 991 GT2RS doesn't sound that different from a 488 Speciale, or a Mclaren LT.


Quick Reply: 991 GT2RS



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:35 AM.