Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Are DFI engines unreliable?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2016, 10:59 AM
  #61  
jumper5836
Nordschleife Master
 
jumper5836's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: great white north
Posts: 8,531
Received 70 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

DFI has also been used in the Cayenne engine since 2007, they for the most part are high mileage daily drivers that see more use then any sports car will ever see. Never heard of any issues with carbon built up on them. IMO 9A1 DFI engine is a safe bet.
Old 02-04-2016, 11:00 AM
  #62  
BGB Motorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
BGB Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Posts: 2,776
Received 591 Likes on 261 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Seth Thomas
And we both know of at least 2 of these motors that ran for 24 Hours straight at speed without a hiccup a few years ago. Not too bad for a street motor
I will throw out the additional data point that after the 24 Hour we put a motor in the car that had been in 2 other prior conversions and then proceeded to run an entire season on it putting the time clock somewhere around 130 hours before we yanked it and retired it. The best part was that after all that abuse and any number of excessive downshifts, despite being revved to 8125 RPM the thing still made 399.8 RWHP on the dyno showing no signs of age. We wanted to pull it apart to study it but needed the core value return so it got returned to the factory. When i told the reps from Porsche Motorsport the hours on it they looked at me like i was some sort of Ginger Headed Italian.
__________________
BGB Motorsports Group
Old 02-04-2016, 11:55 AM
  #63  
MileHigh911
Three Wheelin'
 
MileHigh911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by orthojoe
There you have it, folks. This was all much to do about nothing. Pages of paranoia and speculation can end now. 9A1 DFI has been a solid rock since it's introduction in 2009. GT3 engine has its own unique issues and differences from the standard 9A1 used in the GT4 anyway.
Agreed Joe!! Wait until all cars are electric...... then, like we all miss checking a dipstick, we will all miss the idiosyncrasies of the internal combustion engine. The sky is not falling, and with every new government regulation, new problems come about. To me, this just means that part of the maintenance schedule for my GT3 is to drive it hot and fast.......but maybe still shift at 8600
Old 02-04-2016, 12:12 PM
  #64  
A418t81
Rennlist Member
 
A418t81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Alabama
Posts: 794
Received 199 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

Compared to the Mezger, the 9A1 has Toyota levels of reliability. I've spent $15k in preventative maintence and repairs on my Mezger powered turbo in the past two years. I just got the car back a week ago after the infamous intake cam sleeve slip. I love the motor and it has tons of character, but I feel the 9A1 in my GT3 is equally entertaining and it's a hell of a lot less to worry with as well.
Old 02-04-2016, 12:30 PM
  #65  
FLT6SPD
Rennlist Member
 
FLT6SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 2,067
Received 592 Likes on 259 Posts
Default

You can not "compare" your modified 997 turbo motor and reliability, trying to "break records" with bolt ons of course you are going to have reliability issues. With that said I had a massaged 997turbo EVT775 for a few years and did not have one issue, maybe it was an engineered program, or maybe I got lucky?

All of the 9A1 and Mezger GT1 block owners have there panties pretty tight and feel the need to deflect and defend there purchase. I for one am skipping the 991 all together and waiting until it trims back down to 997 levels. If I want a luxo interior I'll go for the panamera.

Originally Posted by A418t81
Compared to the Mezger, the 9A1 has Toyota levels of reliability. I've spent $15k in preventative maintence and repairs on my Mezger powered turbo in the past two years. I just got the car back a week ago after the infamous intake cam sleeve slip. I love the motor and it has tons of character, but I feel the 9A1 in my GT3 is equally entertaining and it's a hell of a lot less to worry with as well.
Old 02-04-2016, 12:42 PM
  #66  
Drifting
Rennlist Member
 
Drifting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 5,025
Received 1,188 Likes on 631 Posts
Default

Can John or someone else comment on how this cleaning would take place on a GT3 engine?

Would it be the walnut thing, or some other technique?
Old 02-04-2016, 12:43 PM
  #67  
A418t81
Rennlist Member
 
A418t81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Alabama
Posts: 794
Received 199 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FLT6SPD
You can not "compare" your modified 997 turbo motor and reliability, trying to "break records" with bolt ons of course you are going to have reliability issues. With that said I had a massaged 997turbo EVT775 for a few years and did not have one issue, maybe it was an engineered program, or maybe I got lucky?

All of the 9A1 and Mezger GT1 block owners have there panties pretty tight and feel the need to deflect and defend there purchase. I for one am skipping the 991 all together and waiting until it trims back down to 997 levels. If I want a luxo interior I'll go for the panamera.
This is hilarious coming from you. I've not been on the GT3 forums long, but you immediately stuck out as the biggest Mezger apologist I've come across.

My 997 has had NOTHING break as a result of the power I'm making. The coolant pipe issue is well documented. I also converted the plastic pipe connections that split under the intake manifold to the metal sharkwerks ones as well. The intake cam sleeve issue is also completely unrelated to power production and happens on stock cars mostly. This is an up and coming common failure with a $6k price tag. Finally, Porsche has used the same sh!tty power assisted slave and accumulator setup for 10 years on the 996 and 997 with a design that is guaranteed to fail, with no new design to fix the incredibly common failure points here.

The Mezger is a fun motor, but it's no more fun than the 9A1 is in the GT3, and has many design flaws that cost quite a bit of money to repair or correct preemptively. It's just that simple. I own and love both, you have a chip on your shoulder and your bias is blinding.
Old 02-04-2016, 01:08 PM
  #68  
CYKBC
Racer
 
CYKBC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 294
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Something to consider for long-term ownership scenarios - I know Toyota, well known with their infatuation with quality/reliability/durability in the industry, offer up direct + port injection to greatly reduce (nigh eliminate) risk of carbon build-up in some of their higher powered engines.
Old 02-04-2016, 01:13 PM
  #69  
FLT6SPD
Rennlist Member
 
FLT6SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 2,067
Received 592 Likes on 259 Posts
Default

You sir are an expert

Lets not delve into personal attacks, it gets you know where.

Originally Posted by A418t81
This is hilarious coming from you. I've not been on the GT3 forums long, but you immediately stuck out as the biggest Mezger apologist I've come across.

My 997 has had NOTHING break as a result of the power I'm making. The coolant pipe issue is well documented. I also converted the plastic pipe connections that split under the intake manifold to the metal sharkwerks ones as well. The intake cam sleeve issue is also completely unrelated to power production and happens on stock cars mostly. This is an up and coming common failure with a $6k price tag. Finally, Porsche has used the same sh!tty power assisted slave and accumulator setup for 10 years on the 996 and 997 with a design that is guaranteed to fail, with no new design to fix the incredibly common failure points here.

The Mezger is a fun motor, but it's no more fun than the 9A1 is in the GT3, and has many design flaws that cost quite a bit of money to repair or correct preemptively. It's just that simple. I own and love both, you have a chip on your shoulder and your bias is blinding.
Old 02-04-2016, 01:27 PM
  #70  
jumper5836
Nordschleife Master
 
jumper5836's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: great white north
Posts: 8,531
Received 70 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A418t81
This is hilarious coming from you. I've not been on the GT3 forums long, but you immediately stuck out as the biggest Mezger apologist I've come across.

My 997 has had NOTHING break as a result of the power I'm making. The coolant pipe issue is well documented. I also converted the plastic pipe connections that split under the intake manifold to the metal sharkwerks ones as well. The intake cam sleeve issue is also completely unrelated to power production and happens on stock cars mostly. This is an up and coming common failure with a $6k price tag. Finally, Porsche has used the same sh!tty power assisted slave and accumulator setup for 10 years on the 996 and 997 with a design that is guaranteed to fail, with no new design to fix the incredibly common failure points here.

The Mezger is a fun motor, but it's no more fun than the 9A1 is in the GT3, and has many design flaws that cost quite a bit of money to repair or correct preemptively. It's just that simple. I own and love both, you have a chip on your shoulder and your bias is blinding.
The 997 Turbo and 997 GT3 Mezger engine are different, the turbo as you pointed out has a pressed on sleeve unlike the older out going model turbo's mezger and the 997 turbo got all the plastic coolant couplers that will crack. Also 997 GT3 doesn't have assisted clutch and the turbos slave and accumulator are actually the same as the 993 turbo. The 997 turbo mezger is a mixed bag of cost saving measures.
Old 02-04-2016, 01:38 PM
  #71  
A418t81
Rennlist Member
 
A418t81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Alabama
Posts: 794
Received 199 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FLT6SPD
You can not "compare" your modified 997 turbo motor and reliability, trying to "break records" with bolt ons of course you are going to have reliability issues. With that said I had a massaged 997turbo EVT775 for a few years and did not have one issue, maybe it was an engineered program, or maybe I got lucky?

All of the 9A1 and Mezger GT1 block owners have there panties pretty tight and feel the need to deflect and defend there purchase. I for one am skipping the 991 all together and waiting until it trims back down to 997 levels. If I want a luxo interior I'll go for the panamera.
Originally Posted by FLT6SPD
You sir are an expert

Lets not delve into personal attacks, it gets you know where.
I apologize, my post came off a bit more harsh than I had intended, but my point still stands. Yes, I feel like I know my way around a turbo Mezger very well given how much I've pushed the stock turbo platform along. I'm extremely familiar with all the intricacies of it, right down to how hard they are to time back up correctly after a cam replacement (don't ask lol).
Old 02-04-2016, 01:44 PM
  #72  
997s07
Burning Brakes
 
997s07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

The GT1 Mezger is a legendary engine. That engine has gone through many iterations from as far, and if not further back, as the 964. Let's see how many Porsche lovers in the future, say 30 years, down the line singing the praises and using the 9A1.

The above said, there is no denying that the Mezger needs to be replaced. So far the 9A1 has been substituting well. The coking is a serious issue, but as long as there are remedies we are OK. I love how free revving my 9A1 is, it's a fun engine. I love my Mezger also, rock solid, race car sounding, pure viciousness.

I don't understand how or why some here place their personal identities on cars and engines. None of us designed either engine. We paid for them.
Old 02-04-2016, 01:55 PM
  #73  
997rs4.0
Race Car
 
997rs4.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Europe
Posts: 4,478
Received 110 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 997s07
The GT1 Mezger is a legendary engine. That engine has gone through many iterations from as far, and if not further back, as the 964. Let's see how many Porsche lovers in the future, say 30 years, down the line singing the praises and using the 9A1. The above said, there is no denying that the Mezger needs to be replaced. So far the 9A1 has been substituting well. The coking is a serious issue, but as long as there are remedies we are OK. I love how free revving my 9A1 is, it's a fun engine. I love my Mezger also, rock solid, race car sounding, pure viciousness. I don't understand how or why some here place their personal identities on cars and engines. None of us designed either engine. We paid for them.
This^

Won't be any fun when we only have electric engines to complain about. Enjoy these dinosaurs gentlemen.
Old 02-04-2016, 02:06 PM
  #74  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,452
Received 3,799 Likes on 2,197 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 997s07
I don't understand how or why some here place their personal identities on cars and engines. None of us designed either engine. We paid for them.
+1

Our passion for these expensive toys is understandable, but probably best to not let it cause us to merge our identities with them.
Old 02-04-2016, 02:47 PM
  #75  
Alan C.
Rennlist Member
 
Alan C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9,408
Received 988 Likes on 511 Posts
Default

I guess I'll take that For Sale sign out of my car.


Quick Reply: Are DFI engines unreliable?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:23 PM.