Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Embargo on 991.2 Carrera (S) Breaks - What does it mean for 991.2 GT3? Think turbos..

Old 09-15-2015, 01:52 PM
  #106  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,334
Received 1,583 Likes on 732 Posts
Default

Its got to be a unassisted flat 6, V8-V10-V12 maybe an inline 6 for my fun cars.
In heavy, comfy cars more torque more better.
Old 09-15-2015, 03:21 PM
  #107  
Guest89
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Guest89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CHI / ATL
Posts: 2,792
Received 197 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kaution321
That's only 3 seconds quicker than a 991.1 Carrera S. It's amazing how close they are and yet so different.
I pulled the quote from an article; apparently that was wrong, the 991.2 Carrera S is 7:30, per the press kit. My mistake, but it only strengthens the arguments I made.

Originally Posted by doubleurx
I was going to say as well...the 911 isn't the start. Panamara and Cayenne all had hybrid options for a few years now and like Pete said, the Cayenne GTS lost it's V8 for a turbo 6. Macans don't even have an NA option. In fact the 911 is the second to last line up seeing these changes. It will be across the board with the new motors for the Boxter and Cayman.
Agreed.

BTW Porsche also has more hybrid models than any other manufacturer, and they are obviously going to be marketing electric cars heavily after the showing at Geneva.
Old 09-15-2015, 03:30 PM
  #108  
usctrojanGT3
Rennlist Member
 
usctrojanGT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 16,249
Received 3,788 Likes on 2,157 Posts
Default

This is a shame where they are going with cars...if I wanted to drive a hybrid I'd go drive my Prius.
Old 09-15-2015, 03:34 PM
  #109  
Guest89
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Guest89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CHI / ATL
Posts: 2,792
Received 197 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by usctrojanGT3
This is a shame where they are going with cars...if I wanted to drive a hybrid I'd go drive my Prius.
I'd rather a hybrid future than turbo.

NA ICE engine = Well understood, highly developed; limited future development due to political/regulatory climate and diminishing returns

FI ICE engine = Well understood, highly developed; significant near-term development courtesy of political/regulatory climate, but will be focused on emissions and efficiency moreso than outright performance

Hybrid = Relatively new, emergent technology; battery technology is developing rapidly. Who's to say that a theoretical hybrid 911 a decade from now wouldn't be a great car?
Old 09-15-2015, 03:43 PM
  #110  
Zeus
Rennlist Member
 
Zeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 382
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Guest89
I'd rather a hybrid future than turbo.

NA ICE engine = Well understood, highly developed; limited future development due to political/regulatory climate and diminishing returns

FI ICE engine = Well understood, highly developed; significant near-term development courtesy of political/regulatory climate, but will be focused on emissions and efficiency moreso than outright performance

Hybrid = Relatively new, emergent technology; battery technology is developing rapidly. Who's to say that a theoretical hybrid 911 a decade from now wouldn't be a great car?
Battery weight. Heat. Charge/Discharge cycles.

Note how much the press is having a field day with the Tesla P85D and it's "Insane" mode BS. Sure, it'll knock your head off in a straight line, but I wonder how many laps that 5,000 Lb sedan can do around a racetrack before it runs out of juice, or worse.
Old 09-15-2015, 04:09 PM
  #111  
FRP||
Advanced
 
FRP||'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Houston
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zeus
Battery weight. Heat. Charge/Discharge cycles.

Note how much the press is having a field day with the Tesla P85D and it's "Insane" mode BS. Sure, it'll knock your head off in a straight line, but I wonder how many laps that 5,000 Lb sedan can do around a racetrack before it runs out of juice, or worse.
Unfortunately it severely cuts power a few minutes into a 'ring lap.

Maybe it's pretenting to be a corvette?
Old 09-15-2015, 04:38 PM
  #112  
Guest89
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Guest89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CHI / ATL
Posts: 2,792
Received 197 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zeus
Battery weight. Heat. Charge/Discharge cycles.

Note how much the press is having a field day with the Tesla P85D and it's "Insane" mode BS. Sure, it'll knock your head off in a straight line, but I wonder how many laps that 5,000 Lb sedan can do around a racetrack before it runs out of juice, or worse.
The popular press loves the Tesla, sure. The auto press doesn't necessarily lionize Tesla unduly, IMO.

As for the battery deficiencies, the point I attempted to make is simple - battery tech is far less developed than internal combustion engine tech (NA or FI). It has already come quite far, and many automakers envision batteries supplementing their future high performance cars. Or do you think Porsche, Ferrari, and McLaren collaborated on their hypercars?
Old 09-15-2015, 05:54 PM
  #113  
usctrojanGT3
Rennlist Member
 
usctrojanGT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 16,249
Received 3,788 Likes on 2,157 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Guest89
The popular press loves the Tesla, sure. The auto press doesn't necessarily lionize Tesla unduly, IMO.

As for the battery deficiencies, the point I attempted to make is simple - battery tech is far less developed than internal combustion engine tech (NA or FI). It has already come quite far, and many automakers envision batteries supplementing their future high performance cars. Or do you think Porsche, Ferrari, and McLaren collaborated on their hypercars?
I sure don't want to own a 918 when the battery has cycled out. My Prius used to get 13-14 miles on a full charge, 2.5 years later it's more like 5-6 miles on a full charge.
Old 09-15-2015, 07:35 PM
  #114  
Tre
Racer
 
Tre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not sure if anyone has seen or read this, but at least the 991 generation map is chartered.
http://www.motoring.com.au/news/2015...-engines-53854
Old 09-15-2015, 08:37 PM
  #115  
shaytun
Burning Brakes
 
shaytun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,054
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tre
Not sure if anyone has seen or read this, but at least the 991 generation map is chartered.
http://www.motoring.com.au/news/2015...-engines-53854
Seems to imply for sure that there will be more GT3's in the next 2-3 years, unlike what many on RL have postulated. That's great news if true.
Old 09-15-2015, 09:01 PM
  #116  
Guest89
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Guest89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CHI / ATL
Posts: 2,792
Received 197 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tre
Not sure if anyone has seen or read this, but at least the 991 generation map is chartered.
http://www.motoring.com.au/news/2015...-engines-53854
Originally Posted by shaytun
Seems to imply for sure that there will be more GT3's in the next 2-3 years, unlike what many on RL have postulated. That's great news if true.
Good find. I'd be thrilled to be wrong.
Old 09-15-2015, 10:32 PM
  #117  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,294
Likes: 0
Received 10,712 Likes on 4,753 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Guest89
I'd rather a hybrid future than turbo.

NA ICE engine = Well understood, highly developed; limited future development due to political/regulatory climate and diminishing returns

FI ICE engine = Well understood, highly developed; significant near-term development courtesy of political/regulatory climate, but will be focused on emissions and efficiency moreso than outright performance

Hybrid = Relatively new, emergent technology; battery technology is developing rapidly. Who's to say that a theoretical hybrid 911 a decade from now wouldn't be a great car?
^ this.
Old 09-16-2015, 03:59 AM
  #118  
fxz
Race Car
 
fxz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The way to hell is paved by good intentions “Wenn ich Purist höre...entsichere ich meinen Browning” "Myths are fuel for marketing (and nowadays for flippers too,,,)" time to time is not sufficient to be a saint, you must be also an Hero
Posts: 4,436
Received 421 Likes on 249 Posts
Default

who knows the 9a2 3.0 engine weight ?
Old 09-16-2015, 09:47 AM
  #119  
sechsgang
Rennlist Member
 
sechsgang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ...PA...
Posts: 3,941
Received 960 Likes on 455 Posts
Default

I don't know how they keep the motors with the new emissions standards they need to uphold as of 2018...but either way that will be great!
Old 09-16-2015, 10:16 AM
  #120  
ShakeNBake
Rennlist Member
 
ShakeNBake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,637
Received 938 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fxz
who knows the 9a2 3.0 engine weight ?
I think I read that it's 40lbs more than the outgoing 3.8. The block is lighter and stronger, it has no iron liners, a simpler intake plenum, and a couple other changes that lighten it, but then 2 turbos, plumbing, and intercoolers make up the savings and increase the net to ~40 over.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Embargo on 991.2 Carrera (S) Breaks - What does it mean for 991.2 GT3? Think turbos..



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:02 AM.