Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991.2 GT3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-03-2015, 04:50 PM
  #16  
Bandit201
Burning Brakes
 
Bandit201's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Anaheim Hills,CA
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Great question. Got me thinking on that one. I would love to hear the answer.
Old 03-03-2015, 06:16 PM
  #17  
CTT-QTR
Instructor
 
CTT-QTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 123
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Whatever their plans are, I just hope they continue to develop/make NA engines for the GT3.
Old 03-03-2015, 06:34 PM
  #18  
bronson7
Nordschleife Master
 
bronson7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,843
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CTT-QTR
Whatever their plans are, I just hope they continue to develop/make NA engines for the GT3.

So do I.
Old 03-03-2015, 08:41 PM
  #19  
KenU
Rennlist Member
 
KenU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by NateOZ
I think this is spot on. I don't think there will be a 991.2 GT3 and GT3 RS, I think we'll see a GT2 and GT2 RS. Fits better with the switch to turbos for MY2016.
Absolute bullseye post, Nate!! That's what's coming next. No, I didn't hear that from any reliable source but seems to be the most logical next chapter. I think the GT3 and RS are maxed out, as evidenced by the narrow separation of both - no more N/A's. Hope not, but a heavy lean over to turbos in the entire line as commented by Porsche execs.
Old 03-03-2015, 08:46 PM
  #20  
MaxLTV
Rennlist Member
 
MaxLTV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: West Vancouver and San Francisco
Posts: 4,186
Received 1,150 Likes on 568 Posts
Default

I agree that the current GT3 & RS engines are likely stop-gap solutions for Porsche. But it's not a bad thing - given that they are pretty good, they are not lame ducks but rather unique milestones. I hope Porsche keeps these engines for another iteration (.2) but eventually it will have to move on to turbos or electric or a combination of those.
Old 03-03-2015, 08:58 PM
  #21  
fastmd
Burning Brakes
 
fastmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the garage
Posts: 1,247
Received 280 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KenU
Absolute bullseye post, Nate!! That's what's coming next. No, I didn't hear that from any reliable source but seems to be the most logical next chapter. I think the GT3 and RS are maxed out, as evidenced by the narrow separation of both - no more N/A's. Hope not, but a heavy lean over to turbos in the entire line as commented by Porsche execs.
My northeast dealer states that this is the plan, but you can never fully trust them.
Old 03-03-2015, 09:04 PM
  #22  
Dave GT4
Instructor
 
Dave GT4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: L.I. New York
Posts: 121
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hybrid tech will get that extra power no problem and no boost needed.
Old 03-03-2015, 09:09 PM
  #23  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,959
Received 339 Likes on 208 Posts
Default

Motors plus a high revving smaller displacement NA engine is the way to go IMO...


https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3/...-assisted.html
Old 03-03-2015, 09:11 PM
  #24  
NateOZ
Race Car
 
NateOZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 3,530
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Guest89
And yet, the Huracan and R8 V10 engine is Euro 6 compliant, no?

Audi especially is a brand that is very, very conscious of public image and political correctness going forward; how can they sneak in a large capacity V10 and Porsche can't do anything...
Audi has already announced the e-Tron, full electric R8 is going into production. They've also announced plans for an e-torque fill diesel edition. Not sure how long the NA V10 will last - it's not a major engine change form the last generation limited R&D cost could justify a short production life cycle.

Originally Posted by KenU
Absolute bullseye post, Nate!! That's what's coming next. No, I didn't hear that from any reliable source but seems to be the most logical next chapter. I think the GT3 and RS are maxed out, as evidenced by the narrow separation of both - no more N/A's. Hope not, but a heavy lean over to turbos in the entire line as commented by Porsche execs.
I too would rather it not be the case, but I think we get a GT2 and GT2 RS next, then followed by a hybrid car after that. Potentially as a new chassis, but it's hard to see that far out.

I've put my deposits down for the 2 and 2 RS, sure they'll be great cars and hopefully high enough redline! I think the sound will be fixed.
Old 03-03-2015, 09:53 PM
  #25  
Just in time
Three Wheelin'
 
Just in time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,293
Received 32 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

IMHO: 4.0L flat eight, normally aspirated, 9250 RPM, motor moved another couple of inches forward. All regular 911s will be turbo.

A 4 liter flat eight would allow much smaller pistons and thus theoretically faster revving. How about 525 HP sound?
Old 03-03-2015, 10:08 PM
  #26  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,347
Likes: 0
Received 10,787 Likes on 4,776 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Just in time
IMHO: 4.0L flat eight, normally aspirated, 9250 RPM, motor moved another couple of inches forward. All regular 911s will be turbo.

A 4 liter flat eight would allow much smaller pistons and thus theoretically faster revving. How about 525 HP sound?
While that would be nice, not sure it makes financial sense for PAG to develop a new engine (the flat-8) that applies only to GT cars (either the GT3 or RS). The GT cars are low volume, low production cars, that do not bring in large profits (or create large profit margins) for the company.

The current iteration 991 GT3 and RS are different as they use a (cough, cough) "variant" of the 9A1 engine from the 991 Carrera lineup.

So with the 9A1 the economies of scale make things viable, but switch to a platform where the GT cars use separate inner plumbing from the rest of line, then we've got issues that pencil pushers will no doubt scream about.

Just my 0.02.
Old 03-03-2015, 10:15 PM
  #27  
arena-RTR
Rennlist Member
 
arena-RTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sunset gun
Two Cents

I believe the 9A1 was conceived and produced as a stop-gap engine to mark time between the Mezger and whatever is next. Mezger insurmountables (even for Porsche) are: high part count (supposedly twice that of 9A1), high manufacturing cost, and, going forward, inability to meet ever more Draconian environmental regulations. Political correctness often carries a very high price.
I see proof of the 9A1's "place holder" status in the fact that Porsche has invested ZERO in putting it into meaningful competition.

Don't know whats next, but probably smaller, probably force fed, probably semi-electric (at least at some point).

Hope it still sounds like a real Porsche.
You sir, make a compelling argument.
Old 03-03-2015, 11:28 PM
  #28  
Just in time
Three Wheelin'
 
Just in time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,293
Received 32 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
While that would be nice, not sure it makes financial sense for PAG to develop a new engine (the flat-8) that applies only to GT cars (either the GT3 or RS). The GT cars are low volume, low production cars, that do not bring in large profits (or create large profit margins) for the company.

The current iteration 991 GT3 and RS are different as they use a (cough, cough) "variant" of the 9A1 engine from the 991 Carrera lineup.

So with the 9A1 the economies of scale make things viable, but switch to a platform where the GT cars use separate inner plumbing from the rest of line, then we've got issues that pencil pushers will no doubt scream about.

Just my 0.02.
Maybe a run of about 2000 to 2500 cars per year may be enough to make it economically feasible. It seems that there were 2500 to 3000 Gt3s produced MY 2015. Don't know if that is a good indication of the marketplace. Also could use for a larger displacement engine for the FeFi. Really we do not have not enough data to make meaningful judgement.. You could be right. The Mezger however was produced in rather small numbers and that did not keep Porsche front manufacturing it as expensive as it was. Maybe VW will put the kibosh to that.

Obviously such engine could be the basis for homologation for future competition motors.

One thing is clear in my head is that the 991.2 GT3 will have a flat configuration as that is the brand.
Old 03-03-2015, 11:48 PM
  #29  
m3irish
Racer
 
m3irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Andreas said there would be NA motors in the GT cars for at least two more years given the small production numbers. That was in the Evo GT4 release video IIRC.
Old 03-03-2015, 11:49 PM
  #30  
TheMethLab
Rennlist Member
 
TheMethLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 134
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Just in time
IMHO: 4.0L flat eight, normally aspirated, 9250 RPM, motor moved another couple of inches forward. All regular 911s will be turbo.

A 4 liter flat eight would allow much smaller pistons and thus theoretically faster revving. How about 525 HP sound?
As long as Porsche makes a 911 it will be a flat 6.


Quick Reply: 991.2 GT3



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:20 PM.