Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Increasing Negative Cambers

Old 02-23-2015, 04:39 PM
  #1  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,393
Received 3,744 Likes on 2,172 Posts
Default Increasing Negative Cambers

My understanding is that the front camber is adjustable, but comes from the factory nearly maxed out (negative) at about -1.3. That seems odd, but does it fit what you all understand?

If so, and assuming shims are the only way to get more neg camber, does anyone know the required total shim thickness to add about 1.5 degrees of camber? That should give about -2.8, which can then be backed off through adjustment.

My understanding is that shims aren't needed to get the rear camber to be in the -2.3 range, and that Porsche doesn't recommend using rear shims because of the RWS.

Last edited by Manifold; 02-23-2015 at 06:13 PM.
Old 02-23-2015, 06:00 PM
  #2  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

You can get about -2.5 without using shims up front. Anymore than that and you need shims.

In the rear my guy guessed that you can get about -2.6 without shims, although I will find out next Friday for sure since the car is going in for an alignment adjustment.

Keep in mind the shims in the front and rear are not the same shape.
Old 02-23-2015, 06:05 PM
  #3  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,393
Received 3,744 Likes on 2,172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by orthojoe
You can get about -2.5 without using shims up front. Anymore than that and you need shims.

In the rear my guy guessed that you can get about -2.6 without shims, although I will find out next Friday for sure since the car is going in for an alignment adjustment.
Dealer says factory setting was -1.3 in front, which can only be increased to about -1.4 without shims. That roughly fits what Macca said in another thread, but contradicts what you were told.

Old 02-23-2015, 06:09 PM
  #4  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 127 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Stock camber is -1° 30' which is -1.5° I just had front camber maxed out to almost -2 degrees (-1° 55').

I was told that there are locating holes at the top of the strut that can be used to get a bit more negative camber (by flipping the strut?), and beyond that shims are required. For my purposes, -2° was adequate.
Old 02-23-2015, 06:29 PM
  #5  
Todd B

Rennlist Member
 
Todd B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,168
Received 433 Likes on 325 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
Stock camber is -1° 30' which is -1.5° I just had front camber maxed out to almost -2 degrees (-1° 55').

I was told that there are locating holes at the top of the strut that can be used to get a bit more negative camber (by flipping the strut?), and beyond that shims are required. For my purposes, -2° was adequate.
If it's the same as the 997.2's, you rotate the strut mount, by removing the top plates. Pressing the mounting bolts out. There's a different set of mounting holes 180 degrees, which rotates the strut to allow for more camber.
Attached Images  
Old 02-23-2015, 06:43 PM
  #6  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 127 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Todd B
If it's the same as the 997.2's, you rotate the strut mount, by removing the top plates. Pressing the mounting bolts out. There's a different set of mounting holes 180 degrees, which rotates the strut to allow for more camber.
That's exactly what my suspension guy at the dealer must have been referring to.

Last edited by Mike in CA; 02-23-2015 at 11:30 PM. Reason: typo
Old 02-24-2015, 01:31 AM
  #7  
m3irish
Racer
 
m3irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
I was told that there are locating holes at the top of the strut that can be used to get a bit more negative camber (by flipping the strut?), and beyond that shims are required. For my purposes, -2° was adequate.
I don't believe the 991 carried that feature over from the 997.
Old 02-24-2015, 02:33 AM
  #8  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
Stock camber is -1° 30' which is -1.5° I just had front camber maxed out to almost -2 degrees (-1° 55').

I was told that there are locating holes at the top of the strut that can be used to get a bit more negative camber (by flipping the strut?), and beyond that shims are required. For my purposes, -2° was adequate.
Thanks Mike. I was going to step in and clear that point up.

It will vary on individual cars and alignment equipment. With my car we achieved a maximum of -2.15' at the front using the factory gear without upsetting castor. Rear max out was -1.55'. I dont believe he top mounts are rotatable and if so would alter castor? castor is really important on the 991 GT3 as there isnt alot of room under there to push the wheel forward or back without fouling the guard liner on hard lock.

I was told using Porsche Motorsport shims on the LCAs was the way to do this properly so I bought the shims. They are no cheap for what they are.

I understand that 10mm shims total = -1.0 camber approx.

My car sees far more road miles than track miles (assumes average of 7-8 full track days a year). I do not think I need to go out to -2.7 front and -2.5 rear like the more dedicated track guys here as the MPSC2 are very expensive in NZ (3200 usd a set) and tyre wear becomes the issue for the sake of maybe less than 0.5s on our short tracks here....
Old 02-24-2015, 03:15 AM
  #9  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 127 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by m3irish
I don't believe the 991 carried that feature over from the 997.
Originally Posted by Macca
Thanks Mike. I was going to step in and clear that point up.

It will vary on individual cars and alignment equipment. With my car we achieved a maximum of -2.15' at the front using the factory gear without upsetting castor. Rear max out was -1.55'. I dont believe he top mounts are rotatable and if so would alter castor? castor is really important on the 991 GT3 as there isnt alot of room under there to push the wheel forward or back without fouling the guard liner on hard lock.

I was told using Porsche Motorsport shims on the LCAs was the way to do this properly so I bought the shims. They are no cheap for what they are.

I understand that 10mm shims total = -1.0 camber approx.

My car sees far more road miles than track miles (assumes average of 7-8 full track days a year). I do not think I need to go out to -2.7 front and -2.5 rear like the more dedicated track guys here as the MPSC2 are very expensive in NZ (3200 usd a set) and tyre wear becomes the issue for the sake of maybe less than 0.5s on our short tracks here....
Thanks guys, for the clarification. I was told initially that there were additional alignment holes with the 991 but it's possible that the suspension guy was making an assumption based on his knowledge of the 997.

Regardless, I didn't pursue the issue further as for a street car that will be used for autocross I didn't feel I wanted more negative camber than the -2 degrees in front that was obtainable with the stock set up, at least for now.
Old 02-24-2015, 03:31 AM
  #10  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Problem is I think it looks different up top Mike?
Attached Images  
Old 02-24-2015, 03:36 AM
  #11  
doba_s
Rennlist Member
 
doba_s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Danville, CA
Posts: 469
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Yes top mounts on 991 GT3 can not be rotated.

To increase the camber beyond what you can get on the top you need to add shims. Also you want to make sure when adding shims you are not widening one side more than other, meaning you need to add the right size shims and maintain the same distance from the center line of the car to the left and right.

Decent alignment machine would be able to show you this information and based on that you can add shims to both or just one side. Fine tune it by adjusting on the top.
Old 02-24-2015, 08:21 AM
  #12  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,393
Received 3,744 Likes on 2,172 Posts
Default

Looks like Tarett has shims, but I haven't confirmed their application to the 991 GT3:

http://www.tarett.com/items/991-981-...him-detail.htm

Their website notes about 10 mm of shim for 1 degree of camber, as Macca said.

I'm still baffled by the wide differences in adjustability people are reporting without shims. On my car, without shims, my dealer said he can't even get to -1.4 F but can get to -2.3 R without difficulty. Others are reporting more than -2.0 F but not being able to get to -2.0 R. Are the manufacturing tolerances really that wide?
Old 02-24-2015, 10:28 AM
  #13  
BigT
Rennlist Member
 
BigT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Posts: 73
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Guys, took delivery of my 2015 just before the snow arrived in the Mid Atlantic so only have a few hundred miles on the car and of course as you all say it is wonderful. Now in garage on lift keeping warm so have taken time to check alignment, and inspect. My car came dead on to factory specs== -1.5 degrees camber all four wheels, front toe 0.5mm in on both wheels, 1.5mm in on both rears, ride height within a few millimeters of spec front and rear.

So now my question; does anyone know how to set rear toe?. This will need to be done if changing rear camber. For years I have done my own alignments on 996 Cup, 997 cup and GT3RS so understand the kinematics, but with the motorized adjustable rear toe, how does one either lengthen or shorten rear toe link when changing camber? (Front looks pretty straight forward and like prior models with adjustable length steering arms.)
Thanks, Tom
Old 02-24-2015, 10:36 AM
  #14  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Manifold. You dealer is wrong I believe. I spent time talking with Chick Moreland at Elephant racing about this before my alignment guy even touched the car. As you are aware Chuck was an early 991 GT3 owner and did some great work on his site explaining the 991 GT3 suspension and even comparing it to a 991 Cup car. He told me max would be around -2.0 front and rear but rear maybe less. Sure enough he was almost spot on and everyone also has found the same.

There isnt a wide range of difference between cars as you say. I think you will find most of the 991 GT3s will get close to -2.10 F and -2.0 within 5 minutes which is very small.

I did not want to mislead. The top mount can be moved as mine was to get get maximum front negative camber without shims (-2.15) and perhaps there is another few tenths. However the movement is only via the 5-7mm of slot on the top mounts where the bolts go through so is very little and of course the risk is changing castor/wheelbase etc.

Here are the Shim part numbers you need from Porsche Motorsports. They are not cheap! The Tarrett ones will work fine and Im sure Elephant make them also (they do great stuff IMO and get my vote).

Tom - I believe the important thing for the rear is you have the steering wheel dead centre with he car on before switching off so the RWS motor and arm are locked into the 0 degree offset position.
Attached Images  
Old 02-24-2015, 10:55 AM
  #15  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Manifold
Looks like Tarett has shims, but I haven't confirmed their application to the 991 GT3: http://www.tarett.com/items/991-981-...him-detail.htm Their website notes about 10 mm of shim for 1 degree of camber, as Macca said. I'm still baffled by the wide differences in adjustability people are reporting without shims. On my car, without shims, my dealer said he can't even get to -1.4 F but can get to -2.3 R without difficulty. Others are reporting more than -2.0 F but not being able to get to -2.0 R. Are the manufacturing tolerances really that wide?
Tarret and RSS shims will work in the front. They are all the same shaped shims used on the cup cars.

I am not aware of an aftermarket source for the rear shims. We ordered these from the dealer.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Increasing Negative Cambers



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:26 PM.