Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Reverse Camera and Parking Sensors?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-2014, 07:37 PM
  #31  
mhh
Instructor
 
mhh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Adelaide, South Australia and Bucks, UK
Posts: 221
Received 31 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neanicu
Geez...is that why the GT3 should have a backup camera?!
Well, it is the reason the next model might have it.

http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com..._New_Vehicles/
Old 01-30-2014, 07:43 PM
  #32  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,958
Received 339 Likes on 208 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mhh
Well, it is the reason the next model might have it. http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com..._New_Vehicles/
Well,I don't do politics,but wondering...is it made by the same clowns whom are being stiff about the sport buckets?
Old 01-30-2014, 07:47 PM
  #33  
Keadog
Rennlist Member
 
Keadog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,790
Received 1,011 Likes on 608 Posts
Default

I can't see anything when I try to back up in my Boxster with the top up. If I can't find a reliable aftermarket backup camera, it will probably lead me to sell/trade it. It's simply not safe. Of course, I'll never own a GT3 since I don't need or want what it can do, but I just don't feel less manly when I can see what's behind me when I'm backing up, whether its because there's adequate glass or a functioning camera.
Old 01-30-2014, 08:12 PM
  #34  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,958
Received 339 Likes on 208 Posts
Default

My apologies if anyone thought I'm leading the discussion towards someone's manhood...far from me.
I believe it is more about value : Porsche is making a lot of money on options. Some are must have but most are a waste of money IMO. Especially if you're going to end up trading the car in 2 years with a huge loss.
So you're speccing a nice fully loaded car for the next guy. Some see a backup camera as a must have,I don't...to each his own...
Even more so being a GT3...
How do you want your strippers? Naked right? They're not fun with clothes on... That's how I would spec this car...just like I would " spec " a stripper. :icon507:
Old 01-30-2014, 08:50 PM
  #35  
997TTMeteor
Pro
 
997TTMeteor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 539
Received 29 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Even the new C7.R racecar has a rearview camera:

Old 01-30-2014, 10:02 PM
  #36  
sgroer
Rennlist Member
 
sgroer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 3,538
Received 1,013 Likes on 280 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neanicu
My apologies if anyone thought I'm leading the discussion towards someone's manhood...far from me.
I believe it is more about value : Porsche is making a lot of money on options. Some are must have but most are a waste of money IMO. Especially if you're going to end up trading the car in 2 years with a huge loss.
So you're speccing a nice fully loaded car for the next guy. Some see a backup camera as a must have,I don't...to each his own...
Even more so being a GT3...
How do you want your strippers? Naked right? They're not fun with clothes on... That's how I would spec this car...just like I would " spec " a stripper. :icon507:
I think this debate gets to the polarity of the GT3 in general - some view it as a kick *** car that they will track occasionally (that's me) and others buy it mostly for the track with little street use. If I were buying it to be mostly a track weapon, I agree the reverse camera is not necessary. But I plan to drive it 2-3 days per week, and be leaving at times when kids are up and about. And I'm willing to forego a bit of the track panache in exchange for a bit more safety.

But I can see both sides of the argument very clearly. There are other non track options I got - carbon illuminated door sills, for example... what can I say? I think they are cool.
Old 01-30-2014, 10:13 PM
  #37  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,958
Received 339 Likes on 208 Posts
Default

No worries sgroer,enjoy whatever you want,there's no right or wrong here IMO.

Old 01-31-2014, 12:47 AM
  #38  
Zeus
Rennlist Member
 
Zeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 382
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RayDBonz
Depends on what you want - an intelligent car, or an intelligent driver.
Originally Posted by timothymoffat
This. So much of this technology encourages laziness on the part of the driver.
Originally Posted by timothymoffat
I get it. Unfortunately I'm a firm believer that there are simply too many distractions in today's cars. Heavy reliance on electronics and electronic devices to "save us" results in people becoming less aware of their circumstances and surroundings when driving. In other words, if people would put down/turn off the phone/DVD/camera/satnav/fridge/whatever and pay attention to the job at hand, we'd be better off. Driving should NOT be part of multitasking.
I agree 100 percent.
It should be an option, not a regulation. Period.



Quick Reply: Reverse Camera and Parking Sensors?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:12 AM.