Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

simple question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2014, 11:21 AM
  #1  
RD16RR
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
RD16RR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York - USA
Posts: 879
Received 323 Likes on 196 Posts
Default simple question

whats the actual weight of the 991 gt3 with a full tank ?
Old 01-10-2014, 11:29 AM
  #2  
shizzle
Rennlist Member
 
shizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,134
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RD16RR
whats the actual weight of the 991 gt3 with a full tank ?
According to the GT3 book, the car is between 1430-1505kg depending on spec, and I guess you can probably add another 20-30kg of fuel depending on the size of the tank.
Old 01-10-2014, 02:10 PM
  #3  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 127 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shizzle
According to the GT3 book, the car is between 1430-1505kg depending on spec, and I guess you can probably add another 20-30kg of fuel depending on the size of the tank.
I thought that, per European Union specs, the "curb weight" listed in the manual and on the web site included all fluids and a full tank of fuel. I think that's pretty standard, although a few manufacturers still list the dry weight of their cars.
Old 01-10-2014, 02:18 PM
  #4  
RD16RR
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
RD16RR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York - USA
Posts: 879
Received 323 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
I thought that, per European Union specs, the "curb weight" listed in the manual and on the web site included all fluids and a full tank of fuel. I think that's pretty standard, although a few manufacturers still list the dry weight of their cars.
...drumroll.....so, what is it then ?
Old 01-10-2014, 02:27 PM
  #5  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 127 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RD16RR
...drumroll.....so, what is it then ?
shizzle listed the number range based on option content in his post; I thought you picked up on that. My belief is that those numbers include fluids and fuel. The website shows a weight of 3153 lbs (1430 KG)......
Old 01-10-2014, 02:34 PM
  #6  
RD16RR
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
RD16RR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York - USA
Posts: 879
Received 323 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

sorry.....yes..i did.....thanks....i was just thinking someone had it nailed down - 3153 fully fueled is a very good number
Old 01-10-2014, 02:46 PM
  #7  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 127 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RD16RR
sorry.....yes..i did.....thanks....i was just thinking someone had it nailed down - 3153 fully fueled is a very good number
no worries.....I'm guessing no one who's been lucky enough to get a car has taken the time to weigh it yet.
Old 01-10-2014, 02:49 PM
  #8  
RD16RR
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
RD16RR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York - USA
Posts: 879
Received 323 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

..thats right....i know i wouldn't....i'd be driving "somewhere"
Old 01-10-2014, 05:31 PM
  #9  
928cs
Race Car
 
928cs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Le Mans, France
Posts: 3,564
Received 506 Likes on 323 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
I thought that, per European Union specs, the "curb weight" listed in the manual and on the web site included all fluids and a full tank of fuel. I think that's pretty standard, although a few manufacturers still list the dry weight of their cars.
Porsche always indicates the weight with all fluids and full tanks, but with the lightest possible configuration, and no driver. That is the DIN figure, 1430kg in this case. The CE figure includes a 68kg driver+7kg of luggage, so 1505 kg.

So to obtain 1430kg, you have a order a GT3 with the small tank, PCCB, bucket seats but no club-sport configuration and no full leather inside. Maybe a front light configuration is also lighter than the standard?

Quite unusual configuration I think.
Old 01-10-2014, 05:37 PM
  #10  
RD16RR
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
RD16RR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York - USA
Posts: 879
Received 323 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

in the end...i guess "everything" does in fact matter...light feels right, up to a point on the street, at the cost of creature comforts
Old 01-10-2014, 06:00 PM
  #11  
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,270
Received 259 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

The Car and Driver test car, which was Euro-spec but not a Club Sport, and with PCCB, although the seat type is unclear and fuel tank size is unknown, had a curb weight of 3,197 lbs.

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...t3-test-review
Old 01-10-2014, 06:03 PM
  #12  
RD16RR
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
RD16RR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York - USA
Posts: 879
Received 323 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
The Car and Driver test car, which was Euro-spec and with PCCB, although the seat type is unclear and fuel tank size is unknown, had a curb weight of 3,197 lbs.

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...t3-test-review
thats very respectable - what is the weight savings with the different brakes - perceptible ?
Old 01-10-2014, 06:20 PM
  #13  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 127 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 928cs
Porsche always indicates the weight with all fluids and full tanks, but with the lightest possible configuration, and no driver. That is the DIN figure, 1430kg in this case. The CE figure includes a 68kg driver+7kg of luggage, so 1505 kg.

So to obtain 1430kg, you have a order a GT3 with the small tank, PCCB, bucket seats but no club-sport configuration and no full leather inside. Maybe a front light configuration is also lighter than the standard?

Quite unusual configuration I think.
I agree that option spec will make a difference. My main reason for posting was to clarify on the point of whether fluids and fuel were included. As you point out, there's no reason to add extra weight for that.
Old 01-10-2014, 06:20 PM
  #14  
shizzle
Rennlist Member
 
shizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,134
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
shizzle listed the number range based on option content in his post; I thought you picked up on that. My belief is that those numbers include fluids and fuel. The website shows a weight of 3153 lbs (1430 KG)......
According do the book the number does include fuel, but that's probably for the standard tank. If you get the 90L tank, it'll probably end up weighting a bit more filled up.
Old 01-10-2014, 06:28 PM
  #15  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 127 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shizzle
According do the book the number does include fuel, but that's probably for the standard tank. If you get the 90L tank, it'll probably end up weighting a bit more filled up.
OK, I think I see what you meant by your original post. Sorry for the misunderstanding.....


Quick Reply: simple question



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:10 AM.