Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991 GT3 RS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2013, 08:33 PM
  #46  
ir_fuel
Drifting
 
ir_fuel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

"NO RWS, due to racing homologation"

eh, say what now? For which racing series would this homologation be then?
Old 10-27-2013, 11:40 PM
  #47  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,516
Received 1,723 Likes on 914 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
Add 8 cyl put manual back to more than compensate for the weight gains, sell CS package in a box and price is 20% below the Ruf RGT8.
3100lbs, 600HP, more tq, I would have to have it.
Isn't the Ruf V8 something like 88lbs lighter than the RS 3.8 lump?
Old 10-28-2013, 12:19 AM
  #48  
Petevb
Rennlist Member
 
Petevb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,728
Received 704 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nizer
RWS clearly makes car more approachable for less skilled drivers but don't believe it adds enough to laptimes to offset negatives for track junkies. dump the RWS you dump the weight, get the option of using Lion battery, and have clean rear suspension to tune for track.
RWS probably makes the absolute limits of the car higher for everyone, and probably drops significant time in the process. I'm certain an updated Lion will be available soon as retrofit.

The question in my mind is more one of driver experience. The 911 has been around for 50 years not because it's easy to drive, but because it's challenging and involving. With RWS the 911 sounds like it drives more and more like a more powerful Cayman and less and less like a 911. Question is, is that a good thing or not? I'm not sure, but I haven't driven one, let alone lived with one. The 911 used to be one of those cars that grows on you, backwards and confusing at first, but better and better the more you stuck with it. Does making it handle like a mid-engined car lose some of that magic? Sure, it's faster, but is that really the ultimate goal?
Old 10-28-2013, 02:29 PM
  #49  
ricster
Banned
 
ricster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

so will the 4.0L be the metzger engine?
Old 10-28-2013, 03:27 PM
  #50  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 127 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

^^No.
Old 10-28-2013, 05:15 PM
  #51  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,338
Received 1,586 Likes on 734 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nizer
Isn't the Ruf V8 something like 88lbs lighter than the RS 3.8 lump?
Not sure but I figure the Porsche flat 8 or V8 would be heavier..

Originally Posted by Petevb
RWS probably makes the absolute limits of the car higher for everyone, and probably drops significant time in the process. I'm certain an updated Lion will be available soon as retrofit.

The question in my mind is more one of driver experience. The 911 has been around for 50 years not because it's easy to drive, but because it's challenging and involving. With RWS the 911 sounds like it drives more and more like a more powerful Cayman and less and less like a 911. Question is, is that a good thing or not? I'm not sure, but I haven't driven one, let alone lived with one. The 911 used to be one of those cars that grows on you, backwards and confusing at first, but better and better the more you stuck with it. Does making it handle like a mid-engined car lose some of that magic? Sure, it's faster, but is that really the ultimate goal?
Good point, but It could be that the RWS delete kit will also be available if it proves too hard to set up or change setup, making it slower due to improper setup and give it the heavy trail brake fun back.. Than again, I have not driven a 500HP Cayman yet so that might be fun and faster as well.

Originally Posted by ricster
so will the 4.0L be the metzger engine?
No.
Old 10-28-2013, 05:56 PM
  #52  
ricster
Banned
 
ricster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Metzker was the best engine, this is sad
Old 10-28-2013, 08:03 PM
  #53  
sunnyr
Three Wheelin'
 
sunnyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,343
Received 105 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nizer
Isn't the Ruf V8 something like 88lbs lighter than the RS 3.8 lump?
I believe the Ruf V8 weighs ~200kg, but not sure what is included in the weight. (source - http://www.carthrottle.com/porsche-911-ruf-rgt8-v8/).

I remember reading (probably somewhere here) the Mezger in 997.1GT3 weighs - 258kg ((fully dressed weights + DM flywheel).

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
Not sure but I figure the Porsche flat 8 or V8 would be heavier.
The V8 in 918 apprently weighs a remarkable 140kg (source - http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/features/2014-porsche-918-spyder-hybrid-ride-along.html).
Old 11-03-2013, 04:36 PM
  #54  
P_collector
Burning Brakes
 
P_collector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ir_fuel
"NO RWS, due to racing homologation"

eh, say what now? For which racing series would this homologation be then?
This is exactly what I have been thinking as well.

1) that would be a confidence loss in RWS - not to put it in the RS
2) If the reason is "racing homolagtion", then the RS would also not be allowed to have e-steering, e-handbrake..if that would be the case, I´m fine with that and might even consider this car..
Old 11-04-2013, 08:46 AM
  #55  
brake dust
Rennlist Member
 
brake dust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,319
Received 35 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

For which racing series would this homologation be then?
Would be for both FIA and ACO. Both organizations are trying to align their rules for 2016. It's the primary reason that we have not seen development on a new motorsport engine for the 911. The current 911 RSR is based on the 911 4s. All wheel drive is illegal in ACO regulations and so will RWS. It would not preclude the new RS from having it - Porsche AG just wont race with it. The interesting question is do you bring out the RS with a similar engine as the new GT3 or do you wait and bring out once the new rules are in place with a new engine. The current 991RSR is allowed one EVO update - but it has to be within the season. More than likely we will see an update at WEC Bahrain event.
Old 11-04-2013, 12:10 PM
  #56  
P_collector
Burning Brakes
 
P_collector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by brake dust
Would be for both FIA and ACO. Both organizations are trying to align their rules for 2016. It's the primary reason that we have not seen development on a new motorsport engine for the 911. The current 911 RSR is based on the 911 4s. All wheel drive is illegal in ACO regulations and so will RWS. It would not preclude the new RS from having it - Porsche AG just wont race with it. The interesting question is do you bring out the RS with a similar engine as the new GT3 or do you wait and bring out once the new rules are in place with a new engine. The current 991RSR is allowed one EVO update - but it has to be within the season. More than likely we will see an update at WEC Bahrain event.
yes..but all that doesnt answer the question, if RWS isnt allowed, then the RS shouldnt be allowed with PTV, e-brake, e-steering, e-diff, and so on, either beacuse I dont think these will be allowed by 2016 in the RSR. Never.
Old 11-04-2013, 07:57 PM
  #57  
brake dust
Rennlist Member
 
brake dust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,319
Received 35 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

All wheel drive is not allowed either but yet the 991 c4 is what was used for homologation for the 991 rsr. Homologation Is based on approved chassis and engine. ACO rules also have a technical set of rules in which all wheel drive and RWS do not comply.
Old 11-04-2013, 10:16 PM
  #58  
MaxLTV
Rennlist Member
 
MaxLTV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: West Vancouver and San Francisco
Posts: 4,185
Received 1,148 Likes on 566 Posts
Default

Few hours ago saw a white 991 that looked like something between Turbo and GT3 - GT3 front and big wing but air inlets at the rear. Sounds like something that might be GT3 RS, or just a modded Turbo... It was parked by the Ferry Building in SF. Weird. I have no idea what it was. Maybe someone knows more?
Old 11-04-2013, 10:37 PM
  #59  
consolidated
Drifting
 
consolidated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,587
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MaxLTV
Few hours ago saw a white 991 that looked like something between Turbo and GT3 - GT3 front and big wing but air inlets at the rear. Sounds like something that might be GT3 RS, or just a modded Turbo... It was parked by the Ferry Building in SF. Weird. I have no idea what it was. Maybe someone knows more?
I beg of you, tell us your not the only person in the Bay Area w/o a cameraphone and took a pic.
Old 11-04-2013, 10:47 PM
  #60  
MaxLTV
Rennlist Member
 
MaxLTV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: West Vancouver and San Francisco
Posts: 4,185
Received 1,148 Likes on 566 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by consolidated
I beg of you, tell us your not the only person in the Bay Area w/o a cameraphone and took a pic.
Sorry, was using binoculars from an office building window right next to it, so camera phone did not work out.


Quick Reply: 991 GT3 RS



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:10 PM.