Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2013 GT3 Technical features video...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2013, 11:41 PM
  #16  
montoya
Rennlist Member
 
montoya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,553
Received 297 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jlanka
I don't know I don't know I don't know... I'm going back and forth on the fence...

The decision is either:

C4S with X51

or

GT3
No brainer- C4S with all those options will depreciate much faster than a comparable GT3. GT3 (despite many misgivings here) will be a desirable car and the latest version the most desirable until the next one.

Also, no regrets- don't buy the "almost" GT3 and wish you had the real thing later. I still regret not stepping up for a GT3 RS when I bought my GT3, but just a little...
Old 03-12-2013, 11:58 PM
  #17  
DrJay
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
DrJay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 916
Received 27 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by montoya
No brainer- C4S with all those options will depreciate much faster than a comparable GT3. GT3 (despite many misgivings here) will be a desirable car and the latest version the most desirable until the next one.

Also, no regrets- don't buy the "almost" GT3 and wish you had the real thing later. I still regret not stepping up for a GT3 RS when I bought my GT3, but just a little...
Easier said than done sometimes. I am making the same decision and I think I am going to stick with the C4S +X51. Why? Winter for starters, I want the car to be a year round DD and that is just not what the GT3 is intended to be. Especially in MN where we get real winters. Second, GT3s lack of rust protection, which will be important in a MN winter. I plan on keeping the car for a while. I do not care about resale value or depreciation.
Old 03-12-2013, 11:59 PM
  #18  
jlanka
Drifting
 
jlanka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Merrick, Long Island NY (Jeff)
Posts: 3,242
Received 77 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

If depreciation weren't a factor would you say the same thing?
Old 03-13-2013, 12:04 AM
  #19  
montoya
Rennlist Member
 
montoya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,553
Received 297 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DrJay
Easier said than done sometimes. I am making the same decision and I think I am going to stick with the C4S +X51. Why? Winter for starters, I want the car to be a year round DD and that is just not what the GT3 is intended to be. Especially in MN where we get real winters. Second, GT3s lack of rust protection, which will be important in a MN winter. I plan on keeping the car for a while. I do not care about resale value or depreciation.
Rust protection is included in the GT3's for some time. Winter driving in MN? Buy a beater, you don't want to drive a C2S or a GT3 through MN winters. Seriously.
Old 03-13-2013, 12:08 AM
  #20  
mike2727
Rennlist Member
 
mike2727's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Having owned a DSG GTI stock and with a HPA Stage 3 (race flash) I do not see why the PDK does not feel slower than the DSG

Does the PDK also work like the DSG, where one clutch handles 1,3,5,7 and the other 2,4 and 6 ?
So there is always the next gear ready to go

Because I do not get where the difference between 8ms and 100ms comes from

Mike
Old 03-13-2013, 12:10 AM
  #21  
DrJay
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
DrJay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 916
Received 27 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by montoya
Rust protection is included in the GT3's for some time. Winter driving in MN? Buy a beater, you don't want to drive a C2S or a GT3 through MN winters. Seriously.
C4S and why not?
Old 03-13-2013, 01:38 AM
  #22  
mjg
Pro
 
mjg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Presumably that 8ms time is when shifting to a preselected gear, i.e. only toggling the clutch engagement. The sub-100ms time will then come from shifting to a non-preselected gear which involves swapping cogs, e.g. if you're in 4th and the box preselected 5th but you need 3rd.
Old 03-13-2013, 01:55 AM
  #23  
mike2727
Rennlist Member
 
mike2727's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mjg
Presumably that 8ms time is when shifting to a preselected gear, i.e. only toggling the clutch engagement. The sub-100ms time will then come from shifting to a non-preselected gear which involves swapping cogs, e.g. if you're in 4th and the box preselected 5th but you need 3rd.
Makes sense, what does not make sense is that AP mentions the sub 100ms which does not look that good compared to VW's 8ms

If the PDK works the same as VW's DSG why did AP not mention both figures for the PDK ?

Mike
Old 03-13-2013, 05:42 AM
  #24  
StirlingMoss
Racer
 
StirlingMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 338
Received 8 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by mike2727

Makes sense, what does not make sense is that AP mentions the sub 100ms which does not look that good compared to VW's 8ms

If the PDK works the same as VW's DSG why did AP not mention both figures for the PDK ?

Mike
The VW DSG is supplied by Borg-Warner and the the Porsche PDK by ZF. The design is different but functionally similar.

The times mentioned by AP are for non-preselected gears. Expect the GT3 PDK to offer performance far beyond the VW box.
Old 03-13-2013, 05:44 AM
  #25  
Bill_C4S
Burning Brakes
 
Bill_C4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by StirlingMoss
The VW DSG is supplied by Borg-Warner and the the Porsche PDK by ZF. The design is different but functionally similar.

The times mentioned by AP are for non-preselected gears. Expect the GT3 PDK to offer performance far beyond the VW box.
Thanks for the clarification.

Always handy when the signal exceeds the noise
Old 03-13-2013, 06:28 AM
  #26  
911rox
Rennlist Member
 
911rox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Regretfully not at a track... :(
Posts: 2,571
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

AP, would love to take your word for it but I'll pass judgement on whether this car deserves the badge if the dealership make one available to trial at future track days...
Old 03-13-2013, 02:32 PM
  #27  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 127 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by StirlingMoss
The VW DSG is supplied by Borg-Warner and the the Porsche PDK by ZF. The design is different but functionally similar.

The times mentioned by AP are for non-preselected gears. Expect the GT3 PDK to offer performance far beyond the VW box.
That makes sense. Honestly, I'd love to see confirmation of that 8ms VW/DSG time. Why would AP make claims for the new Porsche PDK that he knows could be bested by the box used by the rest of the VW group in it's mainline cars? Besides, it seems completely unrealistic not just in comparison to the other automanual shift times shown above, but when evaluated against my own experience owning both a DSG Audi and a PDK Carrera S.
Old 03-13-2013, 02:36 PM
  #28  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,512
Received 1,721 Likes on 913 Posts
Default

Maybe he was actually quoting shift times for new 7-speed manual in upcoming RS and it was just a Freudian slip.....
Old 03-13-2013, 03:19 PM
  #29  
HiWind
Race Car
 
HiWind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Cape Town, RSA & Sarasota FL
Posts: 4,356
Received 47 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

new vid .... shows lots of shifting despite the terrible voiceover... now claims 0-100 is 3.5s (not 3.3)

Old 03-13-2013, 03:34 PM
  #30  
mike2727
Rennlist Member
 
mike2727's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HiWind
new vid .... shows lots of shifting despite the terrible voiceover... now claims 0-100 is 3.5s (not 3.3)

chassis & engine
I believe the 0-100kph was already 3.5s, the 0-60mph was and still is 3.3s

Mike


Quick Reply: 2013 GT3 Technical features video...



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:13 PM.