Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Natural competitors? Future car magazine group tests...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-2013, 01:59 AM
  #136  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,958
Received 339 Likes on 208 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by savyboy

As a car guy and not a marque guy, I have no joy in celebrating failure of one over another. In my world, everyone wins if there are a variety of fun, capable, honestly represented cars available for purchase at reasonable prices. So it perplexes me why you would find joy in the opposite or so it would seem from your balloon comment?

Several people have made the comment that hyperbolic, voice-of-Moses marketing is to be expected. You are free to accept being patronized by the marketers if that is what you want. I find it deeply insulting. And the fact is, it does not have to be that way, and is not for some manufacturers.

When your product is honest, it will speak for itself. For example the BAC Mono. There is no hyperbole in it's marketing and there is no need because the car is automotive art and deeply desirable to those who have an automotive background and seek an uncompromised driving experience. Not everyone will understand or care and that is just fine as well.

I have had my eyes opened wide to see how other manufacturers approach their customers and I contrast that with my personal experiences with Porsche. Porsche is a marketing company primarily, and they have chosen to de-content in order to boost profit at the sacrifice of engineering excellence. Furthermore, the products are not of any exceptional quality, the company ignores defects, and does not respond to it's enthusiasts, and the pricing of product and replacement parts are obscene. That's fact, not conjecture, that I reached after owning GT3RS, GT2RS, GT3RS 4.0, Spyder, etc etc.

If Porsche miraculously turns around and offers cars and an ownership experience of compelling value, I will turn around just as fast.
If you've been disappointed by Porsche for all this time then you are doing the right thing going in a different direction. It's not like a life changing event,as you said,you can always come back...
I do not necessarily find pleasure in seeing other brands fail as you might think(even though I'm guilty of some mean comments),but I brace myself at the impact a car like Z28 might have if it doesn't turn out to be the beautiful white horse you've been presenting. Yes,the hit will be minor,if it will cost in the 50s,but in the 70s and up you start weighing options...still not GT3 territory and I agree,if the GT3 fails,it will take Porsche years to recoup...
Yes,the Porsche Marketing machine is strong,may it be hard for you to believe,the domestic Marketing is '' sweet ''...it's like a good red wine that you don't feel at first...because it evolves around the price range where they can't be beat and it addresses to a different category of buyers...but it's there,no worries... '' The mighty Z28 with it's 500 HP and 470 torque...''....but it will still have to prove track worthy just like the GT3...
The BAC MONO is a different toy and you are right that it doesn't need much marketing : it's a track tool,but you won't be seeing many driving it on the street...will you?
Yes,Detlev's statement is total BS and you won't do a 24hrs in the GT3 and then drive it home,but people have been driving them to the track and back home for years,why wouldn't the 991 GT3 be capable of doing the same thing?
I'd say you are a cool guy with a lot more Porsche experience than me,but my humble opinion is that presenting an alternative to Porsche for the track is car guy talk,exaggeration is not...

Old 04-02-2013, 04:19 AM
  #137  
wanna911
Race Car
 
wanna911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: With A Manual Transmission
Posts: 4,728
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by savyboy

Agreed on every point, very well stated. Well, except the last point, it is a happy happy day for those of us who are not wedded to marketing spew of a certain German Manufacturer
I don't look at it that way. I was sad to see BMW go the route of non-enthusiast cars because it's one less manufacturer that makes cars that some of us like to buy. BMW had some of the best drivers cars around, that's a huge loss. Not only that, it prompts others to follow suite so they can say they have the latest technology on their car to compete in the market to people who like to hear the names of cool sounding gadgets. It sells cars, phones, computers you name it. The more fancy electronics, the more sales.

There is nothing good about that, and I am in no way wedded to Porsche's increasingly irrelevant status as a top performance car manufacturer.
Old 04-02-2013, 05:33 PM
  #138  
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,270
Received 259 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
People have been slamming the new GT3 because it's so "overweight" for a track car yet the Z28 at 100lbs lighter than a Camaro SS and 300 lighter than a ZL1 is still going to come in at about 3700lbs, nearly 500 more than the GT3. Guess I don't get the logic.
C'mon, Mike - give credit where credit is due. The Camaro is based on an ancient Australian sedan (read: bulky) platform, and the company is barely out of bankruptcy, yet they sidelined the development funds that have resulted in an extremely serious effort that appeals to a very small niche.

Porsche, on the other hand, is the most profitable car manufacturer, and started with a clean sheet to develop their signature product. They chose to go for a wide audience.

That said, I do not think the Z28 will win over many Porsche die-hards. That is what the new Corvette is for. The M3 seems to be the target of the Z28.
Old 04-02-2013, 05:44 PM
  #139  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 127 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
C'mon, Mike - give credit where credit is due. The Camaro is based on an ancient Australian sedan (read: bulky) platform, and the company is barely out of bankruptcy, yet they sidelined the development funds that have resulted in an extremely serious effort that appeals to a very small niche.

Porsche, on the other hand, is the most profitable car manufacturer, and started with a clean sheet to develop their signature product. They chose to go for a wide audience.

That said, I do not think the Z28 will win over many Porsche die-hards. That is what the new Corvette is for. The M3 seems to be the target of the Z28.
Alan, I'm trying to figure out if your post is tongue in cheek or not....

In case it isn't, and just for the record, I wasn't knocking the Z28 (except for a comment about it's looks). If somebody thinks it will make a great track or for-any-purpose car, and wants to buy one, more power to 'em. I don't feel compelled to burst their bubble with a bunch of negativity.

I just found it inconsistent that some of the very same people who have been complaining that a 3200 lb Porsche is too heavy to be a proper track car, were lauding a 3700 lb Camaro for being a potentially good one.

Last edited by Mike in CA; 04-02-2013 at 09:00 PM. Reason: typo
Old 04-02-2013, 05:50 PM
  #140  
MaxLTV
Rennlist Member
 
MaxLTV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: West Vancouver and San Francisco
Posts: 4,186
Received 1,149 Likes on 567 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
C'mon, Mike - give credit where credit is due. The Camaro is based on an ancient Australian sedan (read: bulky) platform, and the company is barely out of bankruptcy, yet they sidelined the development funds that have resulted in an extremely serious effort that appeals to a very small niche.

Porsche, on the other hand, is the most profitable car manufacturer, and started with a clean sheet to develop their signature product. They chose to go for a wide audience.

That said, I do not think the Z28 will win over many Porsche die-hards. That is what the new Corvette is for. The M3 seems to be the target of the Z28.
I agree that it's a good progress, but in the context of this discussion, it sounds similar to those teachers that say "Billy should win the science competition because his parents just got divorced, and we have to be mindful of that." How does GM's hardship or the car's humble origin make Z28 a better car?

I agree that they are gunning after M3, and it will likely eat M3 for lunch at the track, even being heavier. But it will only appeal to those M3 buyers who do not put much emphasis on daily driving, which is a minority.
Old 04-26-2013, 01:45 PM
  #141  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,770
Received 4,721 Likes on 2,691 Posts
Default

Under $55k for Vette C7 with Z51, as I expected:

http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/26/e...orvette-sting/



Quick Reply: Natural competitors? Future car magazine group tests...



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:15 AM.