Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Swift Track Springs installed GT2RS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2019, 10:40 AM
  #1  
Streetking
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Streetking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 214
Received 44 Likes on 8 Posts
Default Swift Track Springs installed GT2RS

Had the Swift Track springs installed on my GT2, slightly firmer ride but good, feels more precise on turn in on the street. I will report back after my first track day. I've used Swift springs before on other cars and have had great luck...



Old 04-16-2019, 11:33 AM
  #2  
FourT6and2
Drifting
 
FourT6and2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,800
Received 652 Likes on 376 Posts
Default

You should track the car stock first. Then make whatever modifications you think are needed, then track the car again and see if there are any improvements or if it actually made the car worse.
Old 04-16-2019, 12:05 PM
  #3  
Streetking
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Streetking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 214
Received 44 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FourT6and2
You should track the car stock first. Then make whatever modifications you think are needed, then track the car again and see if there are any improvements or if it actually made the car worse.
Good point and I do get what your saying. I have a good friend who tracks a lot, extremely fast and has had a lot of time behind a wheel of a 2RS. His impressions were the car was too "soft". We both have very similar driving styles so I decided to just try these.. BBI uses them on their set ups also.. This is not going to be my track only car anyway, my ACR is..
Old 04-16-2019, 12:14 PM
  #4  
Jickel180
Rennlist Member
 
Jickel180's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 686
Received 444 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

Well, it looks the business at the very least. Did Porsche go with a softer spring rate on the 2RS?
Old 04-16-2019, 12:53 PM
  #5  
FourT6and2
Drifting
 
FourT6and2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,800
Received 652 Likes on 376 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jickel180
Well, it looks the business at the very least. Did Porsche go with a softer spring rate on the 2RS?
I don't believe so. I think they're even stiffer than the 3RS. I can't find an exact number but one article states the springs rates are 30% higher than the .2 3RS, which are 100nm front and 160nm rear.
Old 04-16-2019, 03:35 PM
  #6  
Hams955
Pro
 
Hams955's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Plano, TX / Pagosa Springs, CO
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Interestingly enough my 3RS and my friend's 2RS both went FASTER running the cars with the sport mode off and swaybars in full soft setting. This was at our home track in Cresson, TX on the 3.1 mile configuration.

COTA is pretty smooth and high speed but I would be curious to see. I'd run your car on both sport mode and non-sport mode to see the difference. COTA surface has improved but stiffer springs don't always translate into faster times. You increase turn-in but can reduce mechanical grip on a bumpy track.

Good luck.
Old 04-17-2019, 09:49 AM
  #7  
Streetking
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Streetking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 214
Received 44 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hams955
Interestingly enough my 3RS and my friend's 2RS both went FASTER running the cars with the sport mode off and swaybars in full soft setting. This was at our home track in Cresson, TX on the 3.1 mile configuration.

COTA is pretty smooth and high speed but I would be curious to see. I'd run your car on both sport mode and non-sport mode to see the difference. COTA surface has improved but stiffer springs don't always translate into faster times. You increase turn-in but can reduce mechanical grip on a bumpy track.

Good luck.
Thanks, I have run Cresson and Cota is a lot smoother. I actually stiffened up the settings in my ACR and went faster at Cota which is my home track. I have 1780 miles at Cota in my ACR, still on stock Khumos, so I experimented with a few settings, then again, the Viper is a different animal than the GT2..
Old 04-17-2019, 12:29 PM
  #8  
Seth Thomas
Rennlist Member
 
Seth Thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cumming, Ga
Posts: 2,263
Received 250 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hams955
Interestingly enough my 3RS and my friend's 2RS both went FASTER running the cars with the sport mode off and swaybars in full soft setting. This was at our home track in Cresson, TX on the 3.1 mile configuration.

COTA is pretty smooth and high speed but I would be curious to see. I'd run your car on both sport mode and non-sport mode to see the difference. COTA surface has improved but stiffer springs don't always translate into faster times. You increase turn-in but can reduce mechanical grip on a bumpy track.

Good luck.
Makes sense the cars were faster at Cresson with the softer settings since that track is very bumpy. At COTA with the smoother surface I would bet the sport mode and stiffer bar settings would be faster.

Make note that when Randy Pobst drove the 3RS and the 2RS at Road Atlanta for his record laps, Porsche had both the front and rear bars set in the medium setting along with running the laps with the sport suspension setting turned on.
Old 04-17-2019, 12:35 PM
  #9  
Hams955
Pro
 
Hams955's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Plano, TX / Pagosa Springs, CO
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Seth Thomas
Makes sense the cars were faster at Cresson with the softer settings since that track is very bumpy. At COTA with the smoother surface I would bet the sport mode and stiffer bar settings would be faster.

Make note that when Randy Pobst drove the 3RS and the 2RS at Road Atlanta for his record laps, Porsche had both the front and rear bars set in the medium setting along with running the laps with the sport suspension setting turned on.
Good points except I would not blindly assume that swapping to a stiffer spring package would result in a faster car on any track. If it were me I would have tested a baseline with the car un-modified before making a judgement call.


Side bar- do you happen to know what kind of setup angles the cars were running when Randy drove the cars? I have been curious to know if they set up with bar/aero changes only or if they adjusted the angles of the cars as well.

- Chris.
Old 04-17-2019, 05:02 PM
  #10  
Seth Thomas
Rennlist Member
 
Seth Thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cumming, Ga
Posts: 2,263
Received 250 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hams955
Good points except I would not blindly assume that swapping to a stiffer spring package would result in a faster car on any track. If it were me I would have tested a baseline with the car un-modified before making a judgement call.


Side bar- do you happen to know what kind of setup angles the cars were running when Randy drove the cars? I have been curious to know if they set up with bar/aero changes only or if they adjusted the angles of the cars as well.

- Chris.
What I do know on this is that Porsche adjusted the cars to the most aggressive factory specs. Camber was maxed within the factory recommended settings, ride height was lowered to minimum factory recommended settings, aero was maximum on the front and rear, but I do not know about the toe settings used on the cars. Randy did run with ESC+TC turned off along with sport suspension turned on. Hot tire pressures on the MPSC2R tire were 35 PSI
Old 04-17-2019, 05:18 PM
  #11  
Hams955
Pro
 
Hams955's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Plano, TX / Pagosa Springs, CO
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Seth Thomas
What I do know on this is that Porsche adjusted the cars to the most aggressive factory specs. Camber was maxed within the factory recommended settings, ride height was lowered to minimum factory recommended settings, aero was maximum on the front and rear, but I do not know about the toe settings used on the cars. Randy did run with ESC+TC turned off along with sport suspension turned on. Hot tire pressures on the MPSC2R tire were 35 PSI
Appreciate the feedback. I somewhat assumed this to be the case as Porsche would want to run a car pretty close to factory specs without being questioned. - Just goes to show how fast they are out of the box.

- Thank you sir.
Old 04-17-2019, 05:48 PM
  #12  
mdrums
Race Director
 
mdrums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 15,358
Received 179 Likes on 126 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Seth Thomas
What I do know on this is that Porsche adjusted the cars to the most aggressive factory specs. Camber was maxed within the factory recommended settings, ride height was lowered to minimum factory recommended settings, aero was maximum on the front and rear, but I do not know about the toe settings used on the cars. Randy did run with ESC+TC turned off along with sport suspension turned on. Hot tire pressures on the MPSC2R tire were 35 PSI
thanks Seth, interesting info for sure....wonder what “factory” minimum ride height is? Nothing in my 2018 GT3 owners manual says anything about ride height.



Quick Reply: Swift Track Springs installed GT2RS



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:14 AM.