Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Real world differences between 3RS, 991.1 vs 991.2

Old 02-20-2019, 03:33 PM
  #16  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,734
Received 4,700 Likes on 2,681 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A/S
- .2 has a lot more downforce than the .1, 992# vs. 770# on .1 (a winged 600LT has 220 lbs of downforce at 155mph, and a Civic Type R just 66#, to put this difference in perspective).
.
I think the RS downforce is measured at top speed (over 190 mph), no? Really not fair to compare these cars, unless the numbers are normalized to the same speed (downforce increases exponentially with speed).
Old 02-20-2019, 05:26 PM
  #17  
A/S
Burning Brakes
 
A/S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: U.S.
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 283 Likes on 130 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
I think the RS downforce is measured at top speed (over 190 mph), no? Really not fair to compare these cars, unless the numbers are normalized to the same speed (downforce increases exponentially with speed).
Porsche's current downforce numbers are at 186 mph for the 991 GT3RS (.1 or .2), 198-199mph for the .2 GT3, and 211 mph for the GT2RS.

At 155mph, while the 600LT produces 220#, the .1 RS produces 535# and the .2 GT3RS nearly 700#, the downforce difference between the .1 and .2 RS is still significant at the same speed of 155mph, and downforce not only helps on turns, but it helps greatly on braking from very high speeds (before T17 at Sebring, back straight at PBIR, bus stop at WGI, T1 for Road America, etc.). At 155mph, the winged 997.1 GT3 RS had just 84# of downforce (a more stable car at high speeds compared to the 997.1 GT3), the difference between the .1 and .2 991GT3RS doubles what the 997.1 GT3RS had in total. The 600LT number is decent, without gigantic wings this car is close to what the 997.2 GT3 RS did, but Porsche has gone mad (yet not as mad as Ralph Gilles and team did with the ACR-E), I hope Porsche continues this trend and incorporates active aero or some sort of DRS.
Old 02-20-2019, 05:37 PM
  #18  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,734
Received 4,700 Likes on 2,681 Posts
Default

Thanks for additional data
Old 02-20-2019, 09:06 PM
  #19  
tstafford
Rennlist Member
 
tstafford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Nashville
Posts: 4,483
Received 1,080 Likes on 619 Posts
Default

Great write up A/S.
Old 02-20-2019, 10:51 PM
  #20  
MaxLTV
Rennlist Member
 
MaxLTV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: West Vancouver and San Francisco
Posts: 4,178
Received 1,136 Likes on 559 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SGS
Biggest real world difference of .2 is you don’t think about .1 while owning or driving .2.
Genius!
Old 02-20-2019, 11:14 PM
  #21  
mqandil
Rennlist Member
 
mqandil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 1,221
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

A/S did a hell of comparison between both cars. I completely agree with his excellent write up. Only thing I would add is the low end torque on the .2 is stronger than the 0.1 and you could feel that below 4K RPM, which is nice to have on the street. Mark
Old 02-20-2019, 11:48 PM
  #22  
Stethoscope
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stethoscope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Toronto
Posts: 76
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Thank you everyone for the replies and particularly A/S. To confirm - the low end torque is less pronounced than the .2 correct? I’m assuming it won’t make a practical difference in the real world. Please share more differences if any exist - thanks again.
Old 02-21-2019, 12:13 AM
  #23  
Hams955
Pro
 
Hams955's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Plano, TX / Pagosa Springs, CO
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

My .1 3RS had the BBi sport cup suspension upgrade on it so all rubber joints are gone. My .2 3RS is still a stiffer ride on the street compared to the .1 3RS. The .2 is definitely louder but more so from the tire noise and wind. The exhaust note, like .1 3RS, is fairly quiet. Both cars really need an exhaust to wake them up.

Radio/bluetooth at speed is useless in the .2 3RS. I removed my radio completely in the .1 3RS for the same reasons.

Backup camera in the .2 3RS is a great feature; otherwise I would remove the radio from the .2 as well.

Both cars command your concentration when you drive them. I feel the .2 3RS does so more to me than the .1 3RS. I think that is due to the notes above regarding noise and stiffness of ride.

PDK shifting profile has changed and mimics more of the change from .1 to .2 GT3 where it pops and makes more noises. It feels more aggressive for sure over .1 RS.

For the reasons above I LOVE the .2 3RS. It feels more raw and edgy and than .1.

With that to say - if your two options were a well-loved CPO '16 or a ADM or used high priced .2 (assuming you don't have a MSRP allocation) - I would, without doubt, recommend .1 3RS. The price delta between the two won't be felt in the experience or the performance envelope on track. the '16 was REALLY good. Assuming the two choices and the likelihood you're paying 30-40k less for a '16 .1 3RS - I would stick with that.

I bought my .1 CPO. I wanted the joy of ordering my own car for the .2. I checked the box and I am happy.

The .1 '16 is a great car and you'd be just as happy in it or happier knowing you spent quite a lot less for it.

- Chris
Old 02-21-2019, 01:00 AM
  #24  
SocalTouring
Racer
 
SocalTouring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 392
Received 61 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

A/S, thanks for the detailed comparison! These 2 will undoubtedly see some depreciation over the next few years and this will definitely help future buyers. I would definitely go .2 if I were looking
Old 02-21-2019, 01:30 AM
  #25  
-eztrader-
Rennlist Member
 
-eztrader-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,941
Received 250 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A/S
Porsche's current downforce numbers are at 186 mph for the 991 GT3RS (.1 or .2), 198-199mph for the .2 GT3, and 211 mph for the GT2RS.

At 155mph, while the 600LT produces 220#, the .1 RS produces 535# and the .2 GT3RS nearly 700#, the downforce difference between the .1 and .2 RS is still significant at the same speed of 155mph, and downforce not only helps on turns, but it helps greatly on braking from very high speeds (before T17 at Sebring, back straight at PBIR, bus stop at WGI, T1 for Road America, etc.). At 155mph, the winged 997.1 GT3 RS had just 84# of downforce (a more stable car at high speeds compared to the 997.1 GT3), the difference between the .1 and .2 991GT3RS doubles what the 997.1 GT3RS had in total. The 600LT number is decent, without gigantic wings this car is close to what the 997.2 GT3 RS did, but Porsche has gone mad (yet not as mad as Ralph Gilles and team did with the ACR-E), I hope Porsche continues this trend and incorporates active aero or some sort of DRS.
Interesting thanks. Just curious.. any idea what a gt3 touring downforce is at same speed 155?
Old 02-21-2019, 01:57 AM
  #26  
CRex
Rennlist Member
 
CRex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Driver's Seat
Posts: 3,575
Received 377 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

A/S, thanks for the great info!
Old 02-21-2019, 05:29 AM
  #27  
sunnyr
Three Wheelin'
 
sunnyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,342
Received 105 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by -eztrader-
Interesting thanks. Just curious.. any idea what a gt3 touring downforce is at same speed 155?
According to this article, Touring makes 230 lbs less downforce at it's top speed (196mph) than the winged one makes (340 lbs) at it's top speed (199mph). So at 155mph that should translate to -

~69 lbs for the touring (vs 206 lbs for the winged GT3 vs 689 lbs for the RS)
Old 02-21-2019, 05:37 AM
  #28  
Izzone
Nordschleife Master
 
Izzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,341
Received 291 Likes on 146 Posts
Default

.2 to .1 the major difference is engine internals

oiling, lifters etc

.2 engine is chosen Motorsports / cup engine

.1 engine is an experiment with flaws....Porsche knows this

i never owned a .1, but talk to any good engine builder and he will tell you to sell the .1 to get the .2

https://www.autoblog.com/2017/04/27/...-track-weapon/


Last edited by Izzone; 02-21-2019 at 05:56 AM.
Old 02-21-2019, 05:44 AM
  #29  
A/S
Burning Brakes
 
A/S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: U.S.
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 283 Likes on 130 Posts
Default

^^^ That article is pretty nice. Yes, there is barely any downforce on the Touring, 110# at 199mph and 44# at 120mph per that article, is on the low side.

What I find very interesting is that a 991.2 GT3 and a 600LT have similar downforce numbers at 155mph, despite of the McLaren F1 experience and all the spoilers/splitters/wing/diffuser elements in the 600LT, Porsche just does a great job at developing downforce while keeping the cars sleek on relatively low Cd.
Old 02-21-2019, 04:10 PM
  #30  
isv
Pro
 
isv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A/S
The 600LT number is decent, without gigantic wings this car is close to what the 997.2 GT3 RS did, but Porsche has gone mad (yet not as mad as Ralph Gilles and team did with the ACR-E), I hope Porsche continues this trend and incorporates active aero or some sort of DRS.
Originally Posted by A/S
What I find very interesting is that a 991.2 GT3 and a 600LT have similar downforce numbers at 155mph, despite of the McLaren F1 experience and all the spoilers/splitters/wing/diffuser elements in the 600LT, Porsche just does a great job at developing downforce while keeping the cars sleek on relatively low Cd.
People put way too much emphasis on downforce in road cars. the 600LT doesn't have a heap of downforce mainly because Mclaren simply haven't chosen to throw a lot of aero on the car. the 720 per SportAuto windtunnel tests produces a 6kg or so less df than a gt2rs at the same speed (200km/h) and that's a car without large (and draggy) wings....

Last edited by isv; 02-21-2019 at 06:46 PM.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Real world differences between 3RS, 991.1 vs 991.2



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:30 AM.