Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

.1 RS-Most reliable of the 991 GT cars!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2018, 07:55 AM
  #1  
rosenbergendo
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
rosenbergendo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,702
Received 611 Likes on 295 Posts
Default .1 RS-Most reliable of the 991 GT cars!!

Anyone find it ironic how out of all four 991 GT3.1, RS.1, 991.2 GT3, and Rs.2 that the RS.1 will go down as the one with the least amount of problems. So much for that 250k motorsport engine that is headed my way......in 3 months. .1 RS have many many track miles now and have overwhelmingly been reliable.
Old 12-14-2018, 08:38 AM
  #2  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 810 Likes on 424 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rosenbergendo
Anyone find it ironic how out of all four 991 GT3.1, RS.1, 991.2 GT3, and Rs.2 that the RS.1 will go down as the one with the least amount of problems. So much for that 250k motorsport engine that is headed my way......in 3 months. .1 RS have many many track miles now and have overwhelmingly been reliable.
.1RS has proven very reliable. The limited issues with the .2 GT3/RS seems to be with the oil pump on some cars. Another vendor issue. Rather limited though.
Old 12-14-2018, 08:52 AM
  #3  
R.Deacon
Drifting
 
R.Deacon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: south Florida
Posts: 2,261
Received 23 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

yes , even more impressive is how P stands behind there product when an issue presents , seems the only thing not covered is the unit attached to the steering wheel .
Old 12-14-2018, 08:59 AM
  #4  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 810 Likes on 424 Posts
Default

I said bad oil pumps. Going back and looking I believe the issue was bad rod bearings based on best info. Another vendor issue. Seems limited in scope.
Old 12-14-2018, 09:42 AM
  #5  
BlazinPond
Rennlist Member
 
BlazinPond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: ATL/MSP
Posts: 1,737
Received 263 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rosenbergendo
Anyone find it ironic how out of all four 991 GT3.1, RS.1, 991.2 GT3, and Rs.2 that the RS.1 will go down as the one with the least amount of problems. So much for that 250k motorsport engine that is headed my way......in 3 months. .1 RS have many many track miles now and have overwhelmingly been reliable.
A bit early to state such nonsense IMO.

Fwiw, your never-ending commentary bashing the new 4.0 motorsports engine or those that own them comes off desperate to justify an older car.

Actually... glad you finally have one coming so you can give it a rest
The following 4 users liked this post by BlazinPond:
911-140.6 (02-14-2021), 991C2S88 (01-30-2021), Alan C. (01-29-2021), PhoenixINX (02-07-2021)
Old 12-14-2018, 09:50 AM
  #6  
rosenbergendo
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
rosenbergendo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,702
Received 611 Likes on 295 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlazinPond
A bit early to state such nonsense IMO.

Fwiw, your never-ending commentary bashing the new 4.0 motorsports engine or those that own them comes off desperate to justify an older car.

Actually... glad you finally have one coming so you can give it a rest
Have one on the boat bro, so not bashing. Just amusing all the bashing of the prev Gen and the new Jesus motor has issues also. I can also tell you something else. If there is a major issue with the motor that entails more than just an ancillary component replacement I am out.
Old 12-14-2018, 10:26 AM
  #7  
disden
Drifting
 
disden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,444
Received 956 Likes on 427 Posts
Default

I agree, my .1 RS was a monster, never had a single problem in over 8000 miles with heavy track use. Other then changing oil, plugs was perfect. Regretting now trading in for my current .2RS if there are indeed some engine issues. I thought the whole argument that it was somehow inferior because it didn't have a "motorsports" derived engine was complete uppity/pompous BS spouted by people who like to look at their cars in the garage and at CCs, not actually track drive them.
Old 12-14-2018, 10:28 AM
  #8  
consolidated
Drifting
 
consolidated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,587
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

It is amusing. Maybe 'Motorsports motor' means it needs motorsports care and feeding. winking face.
Old 12-14-2018, 10:34 AM
  #9  
mac10
Racer
 
mac10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New England
Posts: 307
Received 66 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlazinPond
A bit early to state such nonsense IMO.

Fwiw, your never-ending commentary bashing the new 4.0 motorsports engine or those that own them comes off desperate to justify an older car.

Actually... glad you finally have one coming so you can give it a rest
+1

It's so obvious when people post things to make themselves feel better. Unfortunately happens on all forums, you very quickly learn who is credible and who is self-serving. It is amusing though, to watch some of these people argue their points to exhaustion and beyond.
The following 2 users liked this post by mac10:
BlazinPond (02-10-2021), pissedpuppy (01-28-2021)
Old 12-14-2018, 10:37 AM
  #10  
Maverick787
Nordschleife Master
 
Maverick787's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 5,298
Received 2,082 Likes on 1,006 Posts
Default

Guys, cool the jets who said it’s an engine problem? First, cars are still on the road, and if it’s a know problem they would have recalled them and no deliveries would occur similar with one happen with the 2014’s. Several cars were released in JAX off the Goodwood Tuesday. Will let you know more my car is on it’s way to the dealer I hear.
Old 12-14-2018, 10:57 AM
  #11  
rosenbergendo
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
rosenbergendo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,702
Received 611 Likes on 295 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mac10
+1

It's so obvious when people post things to make themselves feel better. Unfortunately happens on all forums, you very quickly learn who is credible and who is self-serving. It is amusing though, to watch some of these people argue their points to exhaustion and beyond.
I feel so much better about myself. Whew. Totally self serving as I need to prop up every last dollar from my departed .1 RS to afford my new RS or I might go broke. Hit em with the Hein.
Old 12-14-2018, 11:05 AM
  #12  
Cay_PI
Racer
 
Cay_PI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 381
Received 88 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

.1 4.0 Engine was used in the GT3 R and ran the 24hr races. Can't be so bad
Old 12-14-2018, 11:08 AM
  #13  
mdrums
Race Director
 
mdrums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 15,358
Received 179 Likes on 126 Posts
Default

Whats the issue with the .2 GT3? I just got a 2018 GT3...did I miss an issue with this car?
Old 12-14-2018, 11:27 AM
  #14  
robmypro
Race Director
 
robmypro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 10,220
Received 1,772 Likes on 1,020 Posts
Default

I think the evidence is starting to show that this is a “batch” or “supplier” problem, and not an “engine design” problem. But in reality, that is all the finger follower problem was as well. Mine has 30k miles on it without issue, and there are plenty more like it. Only maybe 5% of .1 991 GT3s had the issue. The difference is that Porsche didn’t catch the finger follower problem soon enough, and they didn’t know for sure which cars would have the problem and which wouldn’t. They probably lacked data on each set of finger followers to know. In this case it appears they do know, which makes this a much easier problem to address.

Ultimately **** happens when you are in the business of leading and not following. But this shouldn’t take anything away from the .2s, just like i thought it was unfair to slam the .1s for the finger follower issues. It is a brilliant car, and for the vast majority of owners it will turn out to be amazing. I know it has for me, and for thousands of others. Heck, even when interacting with hundreds of owners with regards to COG, only a handful had experienced the problem themselves.

Hopefully we can avoid the mistake of tarnishing the .2s because of this. It would be unfair, just like it was unfair to tarnish the .1s for a problem with one part. And finally, we need to recognize that this is truly a first world, 1 percenter problem. You will get your cars, and they will be awesome. There are lots and lots of people out there wondering how they are going to be able to afford gifts for their kids. Or put food on the table.
The following 2 users liked this post by robmypro:
Freud (01-28-2021), pissedpuppy (01-28-2021)
Old 12-14-2018, 11:32 AM
  #15  
Jimmy-D
Race Director
 
Jimmy-D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Midwest
Posts: 11,193
Received 1,389 Likes on 720 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mdrums
Whats the issue with the .2 GT3? I just got a 2018 GT3...did I miss an issue with this car?
I have heard nothing of issues with the 4.0. There were a few people that had some oil leakage issues due to a faulty part but no confirmation this is wide spread or a defective part in 'X" number of cars.

After going thru the engine replacement in 2014 at the port nothing really phases me.

***There have also been confirmed reports of some engine replacements on the .1 RS but also did not hear their is an ongoing issue with that engine either.


Quick Reply: .1 RS-Most reliable of the 991 GT cars!!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:00 AM.