Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

EVO: Three Kings - 2RS vs 3 RS vs GT3 manual

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2018, 05:43 AM
  #76  
RennOracle
Pro
 
RennOracle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 683
Received 32 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911therapy
Yep that certainly makes good sense from a production and R&D standpoint. But, how awesome would the GT2RS be with the new 4.0 liter with twin turbos....?!
Many hurdles to pass and a bit pointless. Car already makes truck loads of torque that is putting a strain on pdk, 4.0 would just make more torque and heavier internals with less space for cooling the chambers that run usually hotter than NA cars.
The only thing they need to focus is on making the whole platform lighter, the cars are getting heavier each gen.
Old 12-07-2018, 09:30 AM
  #77  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 810 Likes on 424 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RennOracle
Many hurdles to pass and a bit pointless. Car already makes truck loads of torque that is putting a strain on pdk, 4.0 would just make more torque and heavier internals with less space for cooling the chambers that run usually hotter than NA cars.
The only thing they need to focus is on making the whole platform lighter, the cars are getting heavier each gen.
However, the 3.8 being used is not Motorsport derived and tested through competition its the standard 3.8 with some strengthening as to some internal bits.

Is the 3.8 that much smaller and lighter to make a difference when the 992 is already bigger in every dimension? Seems the 4.0 is perfect to TT for that chassis.

My guess is they are working on something like this right now.

Old 12-07-2018, 09:57 AM
  #78  
Riz
Rennlist Member
 
Riz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 1,698
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sechsgang
It's called a McLaren...
Without the lose your shirt depreciation, unreliable electronics, and a flat 6.
Old 12-07-2018, 10:03 AM
  #79  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,770
Received 4,721 Likes on 2,691 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Waxer
Is the 3.8 that much smaller and lighter to make a difference when the 992 is already bigger in every dimension? Seems the 4.0 is perfect to TT for that chassis.
No, the displacement change has nothing to do with external dimension changes (in last generation the 2.9L Cayman motor and 3.8L Carrera S shared the same case. I think the 4.0 is likely a bit lighter than 3.8 with hollow crankshaft and Titanium conrods.
Old 12-07-2018, 10:27 AM
  #80  
Bobby 911
Banned
 
Bobby 911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,400
Received 355 Likes on 214 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KBS911
I'm even more impressed with the manual 3.
I know, right?
Old 12-07-2018, 12:06 PM
  #81  
Hex
Pro
 
Hex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 524
Received 94 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Riz
Without the lose your shirt depreciation, unreliable electronics, and a flat 6.
Yes sir! You're on the money with that post. If you buy a new McLaren, you might as well fill a suitcase with hundred dollar bills, force it closed, pour some gas on it, and set it on fire.
There is one caveat though, and that's if you're lucky enough to get a new limited edition model like a P1, a 675 LT, or a Senna.

Last edited by Hex; 12-07-2018 at 12:32 PM.
Old 12-07-2018, 01:22 PM
  #82  
Nick
Rennlist Member
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: La Jolla
Posts: 3,641
Received 133 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rosenbergendo
Uh not true. 2Rs still being produced and more allocations were released a few weeks ago.
Don't know about additional allocation for the 2RS but I'm confident that many more 3RS's will be produced. Thus, the reason for the higher ADM's for the 2RS.
Old 12-07-2018, 01:42 PM
  #83  
bli8
Rennlist Member
 
bli8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 804
Received 218 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GT3RS-Fan1
^^^ Here let me repost as this is an eye opening video that the 991 GT2RS is a Porsche "MOTORSPORT" car.
I see Porsche left no stone unturned on the design of the motor in 2RS and I hear the word "Motorsport" mentioned at least a couple dozen times in the video, but why? Is it worth it for Porsche to pour so much R&D and "Motorsport" DNA into such a limited edition car??? Not if they aren't planning on homologating that engine setup for future Cup/RSR cars IMO.
Old 12-07-2018, 01:43 PM
  #84  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,770
Received 4,721 Likes on 2,691 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bli8
I see Porsche left no stone unturned on the design of the motor in 2RS and I hear the word "Motorsport" mentioned at least a couple dozen times in the video, but why? Is it worth it for Porsche to pour so much R&D and "Motorsport" DNA into such a limited edition car??? Not if they aren't planning on homologating that engine setup for future Cup/RSR cars IMO.
I'll be pretty surprised to see a wet sump motor in an RSR...

It is obviously totally track and slicks capable to be used in the new 935 and GT2 CS - maybe this is the new normal?
Old 12-07-2018, 02:07 PM
  #85  
cobrien
Rennlist Member
 
cobrien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
I'll be pretty surprised to see a wet sump motor in an RSR...

It is obviously totally track and slicks capable to be used in the new 935 and GT2 CS - maybe this is the new normal?
I think Porsche has no choice but to go with a turbo for the upcoming RSR. The competition has gone or is going that way already. 935 and GT2CS are the first steps along the way. And also why the latest GT2RS was designed the way it was.
Old 12-07-2018, 02:27 PM
  #86  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,770
Received 4,721 Likes on 2,691 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cobrien
I think Porsche has no choice but to go with a turbo for the upcoming RSR. The competition has gone or is going that way already. 935 and GT2CS are the first steps along the way. And also why the latest GT2RS was designed the way it was.
Even if turbo is the future, there is no mandate to use wet sump. As a buyer, I’d much rather have turbocharged version of dry sump, hollow crankshaft, solid lifter, high revving motor in GT3 and RS...
Old 12-07-2018, 02:30 PM
  #87  
Golden Boy
Pro
 
Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cobrien
I think Porsche has no choice but to go with a turbo for the upcoming RSR. The competition has gone or is going that way already. 935 and GT2CS are the first steps along the way. And also why the latest GT2RS was designed the way it was.


NA is faster. See article.
Old 12-07-2018, 03:10 PM
  #88  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 810 Likes on 424 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Golden Boy




NA is faster. See article.
Golden Boy: No its not. 2RS is faster. The 3RS provides more performance per $$$$ comparatively.

Grant: The 2RS 3.8 is not a Motorsport engine to my understanding while many of the fixtures pertaining to the turbo charging are.
The fact the 935 and 2RS CS use the same engine doesn't make it Motorsport in that the motor was not developed for racing as with the 991.2 4.0L nor was it used in the factory programs.

Its the same TT 3.8 used in the Turbo S with some strengthing bits internally.

Am I wrong?????
Old 12-07-2018, 03:28 PM
  #89  
SDGT3
Rennlist Member
 
SDGT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 626
Received 51 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

This article makes me even more anxious to run my .2 3RS against the Cup Car. Road Atlanta is better suited for this test because of the higher speed corners and limited long straights. I'll keep you posted when we get this scheduled. I will see if I can find someone locally (Atlanta) that would allow Bryan to drive their 2RS so we can compare the three cars. Too much time, money and effort to send my car down for 5 laps. Both cars would run same Trofeo R tires to make it equal. Anyone interested in having their car participate can PM me.
Old 12-07-2018, 03:31 PM
  #90  
Golden Boy
Pro
 
Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Waxer
Golden Boy: No its not. 2RS is faster. The 3RS provides more performance per $$$$ comparatively.

Grant: The 2RS 3.8 is not a Motorsport engine to my understanding while many of the fixtures pertaining to the turbo charging are.
The fact the 935 and 2RS CS use the same engine doesn't make it Motorsport in that the motor was not developed for racing as with the 991.2 4.0L nor was it used in the factory programs.

Its the same TT 3.8 used in the Turbo S with some strengthing bits internally.

Am I wrong?????


on this track it was faster. Just going by the facts. Thats all


Quick Reply: EVO: Three Kings - 2RS vs 3 RS vs GT3 manual



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:14 PM.