Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

GA coming after MT plate owners

Old 10-31-2018, 10:41 PM
  #241  
Yippiekiaye
Rennlist Member
 
Yippiekiaye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,437
Received 2,260 Likes on 945 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
I live in Montana, but always register and title my cars in California to help the state make up all the lost tax revenue from @usctrojanGT3
Bawahhaha!!!!
Old 11-01-2018, 12:07 AM
  #242  
usctrojanGT3
Rennlist Member
 
usctrojanGT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 16,255
Received 3,790 Likes on 2,159 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
I live in Montana, but always register and title my cars in California to help the state make up all the lost tax revenue from @usctrojanGT3
Awesome.
Old 11-01-2018, 08:04 AM
  #243  
2006m5
Banned
 
2006m5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 656
Received 30 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Yippiekiaye
Many are, many arent.

I think the crux of this argument is what FastMD stated previously- his taxes have gone up and services have gotten worse. And yet the "rich" continued to be told that they arent paying their fair share when a majority of taxes are paid by those with wealth. So when you have an opportunity to save taxes wherever possible, ie car registration taxes, why not do it?
i agree to fastmd as my R.E taxes here in PA doubled basically .
and yes we pay to support children and families that what oppurtunity
but heck they don't pay there share.....how long can this country support the world.
My family came here as immigrants also but legally and we were not given anything.
We work and achieve and pay taxes.
and don't expect handouts.
Old 11-01-2018, 10:29 AM
  #244  
G.Irish
Racer
 
G.Irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 339
Received 205 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Yippiekiaye
Ever written off a personal dinner with your spouse and categorized it as a business expense?
Ever taken a vacation and called it a corporate expense for a board meeting?
Ever bought a computer for yourself but paid for it by your business to take the deduction?
Those are all illegal, it's just that you're unlikely to get caught unless you're flagrant about it or have somehow attracted scrutiny for some other reason.

Lets all stop trying to judge others. If this was illegal, then every time I go to Coffee and Cars here locally and there are a dozen cars with Montana plates, why do the cops, who are present at the events, just sit by and do nothing?
Cops are not usually responsible for catching tax scofflaws. That comes down to the IRS and state tax revenue departments.

You want to pay more tax, by all means do so. There are folks who try to minimize their tax burdens and for that I say good for them.
I don't think anyone is arguing against legitimate means of reducing tax burden. It's when you start getting into setting up sham businesses to get around taxes is where it gets iffy. Not to say it's 100% illegal because other people in other states have fought and won. But that practice dances on the line between tax avoidance and tax evasion.

Any time you make a false filing (like starting a business that doesn't conduct business) in order to evade a tax, it flirts with that territory. Whether or not you get hammered for it depends on how much tax is getting evaded (and how many people are taking advantage), enforcement priorities, how easy to detect and prove the scheme is, and to some degree, politics. The Montana scheme would still be going strong if only a handful of people were using it but when hundreds or thousands of people got in the game, that's when it attracted the attention of the tax authorities.
Old 11-01-2018, 10:56 AM
  #245  
RennOracle
Pro
 
RennOracle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 683
Received 32 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

P.S. why not buy a cabin in montana, get an adress and be 'legal'? I really don't understand this very well, why would police have anything on MT plate cars, they could be registered as an asset of a Zambian llc as long as they are registred in US they can drive wherever they want, no?
If you can open a llc in Montana without living there and register a car there, why and how the hell would someone forbidden that? US is open borders between states, no? As long as there isn't fraud on the process, all is well.
Old 11-01-2018, 10:59 AM
  #246  
Maverick787
Nordschleife Master
 
Maverick787's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 5,297
Received 2,080 Likes on 1,005 Posts
Default

Yes open boarders, but you have 50 tax laws from state to state. Federal tax is common in all states.
Old 11-01-2018, 11:26 AM
  #247  
WenigerAberBeser
Rennlist Member
 
WenigerAberBeser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 2,867
Received 1,336 Likes on 702 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by G.Irish
Those are all illegal, it's just that you're unlikely to get caught unless you're flagrant about it or have somehow attracted scrutiny for some other reason.


Cops are not usually responsible for catching tax scofflaws. That comes down to the IRS and state tax revenue departments.


I don't think anyone is arguing against legitimate means of reducing tax burden. It's when you start getting into setting up sham businesses to get around taxes is where it gets iffy. Not to say it's 100% illegal because other people in other states have fought and won. But that practice dances on the line between tax avoidance and tax evasion.

Any time you make a false filing (like starting a business that doesn't conduct business) in order to evade a tax, it flirts with that territory. Whether or not you get hammered for it depends on how much tax is getting evaded (and how many people are taking advantage), enforcement priorities, how easy to detect and prove the scheme is, and to some degree, politics. The Montana scheme would still be going strong if only a handful of people were using it but when hundreds or thousands of people got in the game, that's when it attracted the attention of the tax authorities.
+1 so much common sense here
Old 11-01-2018, 11:27 AM
  #248  
G.Irish
Racer
 
G.Irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 339
Received 205 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RennOracle
P.S. why not buy a cabin in montana, get an adress and be 'legal'?
2 problems with that. One, unless you already wanted to purchase a cabin in Montana, buying a cabin just so you can register a car in MT and save on tax would almost assuredly be a net loss. Why buy a cabin you don't want for $100k in an attempt to save $30k in car taxes? Secondly, this scheme wouldn't really work anyway because a lot of states require you to register the car in your state of residence if that is where it is primarily garaged. So in the case of GA, if you have a GA license and the car is in GA for more than a certain number of days of the year, you have to register the car in GA. Doesn't matter if you own a MT cabin unless your legal residence is there.

I really don't understand this very well, why would police have anything on MT plate cars, they could be registered as an asset of a Zambian llc as long as they are registred in US they can drive wherever they want, no?
Yes you can drive wherever you want. It's just that there are laws about when and where you have to register a car, based on where you live. And with that, comes taxes.

If you can open a llc in Montana without living there and register a car there, why and how the hell would someone forbidden that? US is open borders between states, no? As long as there isn't fraud on the process, all is well.
This is the issue. If you open a legitimate business and register a car to it, that's one thing. Even then, if the car is primarily garaged and used in another state, often you have to register the car in that state. But if you open an LLC that doesn't conduct any business, just so you can register a car to it to avoid taxes, that's the problem. In general, shell companies are legal for various reasons so maybe some of these folks can fight and win on that technicality but the fact that these guys only opened the LLC to avoid car tax is where the state may have them by the *****.
Old 11-01-2018, 11:36 AM
  #249  
Jrtaylor9
Rennlist Member
 
Jrtaylor9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: East Hampton / NYC
Posts: 3,805
Received 1,094 Likes on 541 Posts
Default

Separate from from the MT thing, but related, how does it work if you store your cars in one state, but typically drive them in a bordering state?

And the additional layer of having your primary address in a different state? Or different country???

It seems like most of the insurance and tax laws around vehicles are aimed at regularly driven/ primary vehicles. Registering, insuring and paying fees/taxes on a rarely used collection spread out in different locations (and that shifts locations sometimes) seems to get a bit complicated compared to the cut/dry opinions/interpretations on this thread.
Old 11-01-2018, 11:42 AM
  #250  
WenigerAberBeser
Rennlist Member
 
WenigerAberBeser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 2,867
Received 1,336 Likes on 702 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RennOracle
P.S. why not buy a cabin in montana, get an adress and be 'legal'? I really don't understand this very well, why would police have anything on MT plate cars, they could be registered as an asset of a Zambian llc as long as they are registred in US they can drive wherever they want, no?
If you can open a llc in Montana without living there and register a car there, why and how the hell would someone forbidden that? US is open borders between states, no? As long as there isn't fraud on the process, all is well.
Each state's vehicle registration requirements are different. Even if you own property in Montana, it doesn't necessarily mean you can legally register a car there and live/drive it in Texas (for example). In Texas, you have 30 days from the time you move to Texas to register your vehicle in the state. Yes, it is probably legal in Montana to register your car there, but if you are a resident of / move to Texas and live in Texas with the car then you have to register your car in Texas. Not breaking Montana law, but you would be breaking Texas law.
Old 11-01-2018, 12:27 PM
  #251  
Hothonda
Burning Brakes
 
Hothonda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,194
Received 34 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Sales tax been an issue for years with Washington State residents who live in WA cities bordering Oregon cities.
i.e. Vancouver WA / Portland OR. Up to 10.1% sales tax in WA + high registration v no sales tax in Oregon
and cheap 2 year license plates.

Washington State Patrol monitors WA residents who are possible offenders w/OR plates and eventually let them
explain their position to a judge.

One example of many:

https://katu.com/news/local/wsp-hand...county-schools

Last edited by Hothonda; 11-01-2018 at 12:50 PM.
Old 11-01-2018, 11:40 PM
  #252  
Dr Chill
Rennlist Member
 
Dr Chill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 262 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

Bottom line is a MT LLC owning a car is legal and not subject to state sales tax. Transferring the registration to the state where the car resides a month or two later should not have any sales tax burden. Also fully legal. If doing this is allowed in your state, why not? I certainly have better use for the saved $ than the state does.
Old 11-02-2018, 12:06 AM
  #253  
Yippiekiaye
Rennlist Member
 
Yippiekiaye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,437
Received 2,260 Likes on 945 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dr Chill
Bottom line is a MT LLC owning a car is legal and not subject to state sales tax. Transferring the registration to the state where the car resides a month or two later should not have any sales tax burden. Also fully legal. If doing this is allowed in your state, why not? I certainly have better use for the saved $ than the state does.
so much common sense here! Agree!
Old 11-02-2018, 12:43 AM
  #254  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,163
Received 3,857 Likes on 1,901 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dr Chill
Bottom line is a MT LLC owning a car is legal and not subject to state sales tax. Transferring the registration to the state where the car resides a month or two later should not have any sales tax burden. Also fully legal. If doing this is allowed in your state, why not? I certainly have better use for the saved $ than the state does.
Not here in the Republik. You’d pay sales tax when you tried to register here if the car has less than 7500 miles on it.
Old 11-02-2018, 02:06 AM
  #255  
Mech33
Nordschleife Master
 
Mech33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,344
Received 606 Likes on 371 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes


Not here in the Republik. You’d pay sales tax when you tried to register here if the car has less than 7500 miles on it.
And you're required to do so within 30 days if you plan on driving it on public roads. This is where the illegality of registering in Montana and then never registering it in California despite driving it on public roads here comes in...

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: GA coming after MT plate owners



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:17 PM.