.2GT3RS driving impressions vs .1GT3RS
#121
It has been well documented on these forums and elsewhere that AP and other members of the GT team were disappointed with the 991.1 RS Ring time. They felt it wasn’t representative of the car’s abilities.
That said, the 991.2 RS time (even with “cheater” tires) is highly impressive. Most importantly, it’s interesting that Porsche was willing to post such a time. It suggests they’re confident the 992 GT cars will be exceptionally capable. It would have been far easier to meet expectations for the 992 if the 991.2 RS posted a 7:05.
That said, the 991.2 RS time (even with “cheater” tires) is highly impressive. Most importantly, it’s interesting that Porsche was willing to post such a time. It suggests they’re confident the 992 GT cars will be exceptionally capable. It would have been far easier to meet expectations for the 992 if the 991.2 RS posted a 7:05.
#122
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 13,366
Received 4,554 Likes
on
2,587 Posts
#123
I posted this in another thread but it bears repeating here:
I have two European friends who just got a .2 GT3 RS; both also owned a .1 GT3 RS.
I asked both how much better the update is compared to the pre-facelift car:
One is a factory driver that I know well: “Uh, the color is different, but that’s about it. Don’t waste your money.”
One is a Piëch family member that I met at Le Mans: “Not so much to be honest; not mind blowing” (that’s verbatim)
#124
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by rsierra
Based on my experience, I would agree. The .2 engine, is however, noticeably "better". Nothing a set of long tubes won't fix. A used .1 is a relative bargain.
Edit: actually I'm just poking. I don't care; it's just the same comments over and over when any new model comes out.
#125
Race Director
Agree with you. But 95% of the posters here are not experienced track guys. Most would be much better off saving the extra money on the slightly faster car and getting lessons instead.
#126
Race Car
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The way to hell is paved by good intentions “Wenn ich Purist höre...entsichere ich meinen Browning” "Myths are fuel for marketing (and nowadays for flippers too,,,)" time to time is not sufficient to be a saint, you must be also an Hero
Posts: 4,486
Received 441 Likes
on
263 Posts
There's nothing else to say other than:
Both are eminently qualified to evaluate the car's capabilities
Due to fortunate circumstances, neither are impacted by having to worry about the price of the car, agonizing over spec / delivery, value, being the first one to have one, etc.
I'm not interested in an RS, but I do find it quite amusing that there are (presumed) adults in this thread who have difficulty accepting the above at face value and are anguished as a result
Both are eminently qualified to evaluate the car's capabilities
Due to fortunate circumstances, neither are impacted by having to worry about the price of the car, agonizing over spec / delivery, value, being the first one to have one, etc.
I'm not interested in an RS, but I do find it quite amusing that there are (presumed) adults in this thread who have difficulty accepting the above at face value and are anguished as a result
is just a (perfect) .2 GT3 with gimmicks for track use only but we know the market
anyway i guess Piëch family members don t have to worry about engine warranty nor to pay 200k for a car
thus not living in the reality realm are unable to criticize any reality
#127
You forget this is Rennlist. Where everyone needs a rollcage and a harness in their car when they will never hit the track with it.
#128
Race Director
#129
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
RS: wider track; wider tires, more hp and torque, more aero. No way they throw down equal times.
#130
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 13,366
Received 4,554 Likes
on
2,587 Posts
#131
Three Wheelin'
I’m surprised there aren’t more folks discussing the dangers of running a cage and using harnesses on the street.
I know when I put them in my gt4 it was a calculated thought process/ risk. Its a car I push to the near limit on track. A good spin into a barrier could cause some harm if I have my harness on and no HANS.
#132
Race Director
I’m surprised there aren’t more folks discussing the dangers of running a cage and using harnesses on the street.
I know when I put them in my gt4 it was a calculated thought process/ risk. Its a car I push to the near limit on track. A good spin into a barrier could cause some harm if I have my harness on and no HANS.
I know when I put them in my gt4 it was a calculated thought process/ risk. Its a car I push to the near limit on track. A good spin into a barrier could cause some harm if I have my harness on and no HANS.
#133
Race Director
I don't know the percentage on RL, but agree that there's not much point upgrading to a faster car if someone can't drive the one they have at 9/10ths+. For most people, getting to that point requires many dozens of track days. I think my wife has probably reached the 9/10ths level; if a girl can do it ...
#134
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 13,366
Received 4,554 Likes
on
2,587 Posts
I’m surprised there aren’t more folks discussing the dangers of running a cage and using harnesses on the street.
I know when I put them in my gt4 it was a calculated thought process/ risk. Its a car I push to the near limit on track. A good spin into a barrier could cause some harm if I have my harness on and no HANS.