Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

.2GT3RS driving impressions vs .1GT3RS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2018, 04:15 PM
  #196  
fxz
Race Car
 
fxz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The way to hell is paved by good intentions “Wenn ich Purist höre...entsichere ich meinen Browning” "Myths are fuel for marketing (and nowadays for flippers too,,,)" time to time is not sufficient to be a saint, you must be also an Hero
Posts: 4,442
Received 421 Likes on 249 Posts
Default

Any on why the .2 3RS steering is less precise than .1 ? Camber? Rose jointed?
Old 08-22-2018, 05:11 PM
  #197  
ajag
Rennlist Member
 
ajag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 874
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Waxer
Ajag had a very good seat of the pants comparison from having driven both. There are apparently noticeable differences in power delivery, ride, suspension stiffness PDK quickness and sound according to him.

There is is no doubt the .2 is a step on from the .1 based on specs alone. Whether you as opposed to someone else will find them noticeable to whatever degree will vary I guess.
To clarify, I was comparing the .2 3RS to my .2 GT3 MT, I have not driven the .1 RS before. Going from .2 GT3 to 3RS is noticeable difference, especially in the suspension, road/steering feel.
Old 08-22-2018, 09:05 PM
  #198  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 810 Likes on 424 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajag
To clarify, I was comparing the .2 3RS to my .2 GT3 MT, I have not driven the .1 RS before. Going from .2 GT3 to 3RS is noticeable difference, especially in the suspension, road/steering feel.
Good comparison none the less.
Old 08-23-2018, 08:55 AM
  #199  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 810 Likes on 424 Posts
Default


Maybe this helps. Found these times posted on a review video.
Old 08-23-2018, 09:32 AM
  #200  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,428
Received 3,781 Likes on 2,189 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Waxer

Maybe this helps. Found these times posted on a review video.
Key question is what tires the .2 RS was on. Interesting that .1 RS came out a good bit faster than .2 GT3. As always, track conditions, driver, etc. can affect the results, so need to take these numbers with a grain of salt and try to aggregate data points to get a better sense of how things compare.

Just in case I get an RS allocation and decide to go for it, I ran a spec this morning and the price came to $194,300, which isn't too bad.
Old 08-23-2018, 12:50 PM
  #201  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 810 Likes on 424 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Manifold
Key question is what tires the .2 RS was on. Interesting that .1 RS came out a good bit faster than .2 GT3. As always, track conditions, driver, etc. can affect the results, so need to take these numbers with a grain of salt and try to aggregate data points to get a better sense of how things compare.

Just in case I get an RS allocation and decide to go for it, I ran a spec this morning and the price came to $194,300, which isn't too bad.
i would think they all ran stock tires as this isn’t manufacturers cheating for Ring times.
Old 08-23-2018, 03:38 PM
  #202  
disden
Drifting
 
disden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,444
Received 956 Likes on 427 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Manifold
Key question is what tires the .2 RS was on. Interesting that .1 RS came out a good bit faster than .2 GT3. As always, track conditions, driver, etc. can affect the results, so need to take these numbers with a grain of salt and try to aggregate data points to get a better sense of how things compare.

Just in case I get an RS allocation and decide to go for it, I ran a spec this morning and the price came to $194,300, which isn't too bad.
just curious, but why does everyone think that Porsche would produce an updated model only to make it slower? If the engine is improved with more low end torque and hp, if the aero is improved, then why would it be an inferior product? doesn't make sense to me.
Old 08-23-2018, 05:30 PM
  #203  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,428
Received 3,781 Likes on 2,189 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by disden
just curious, but why does everyone think that Porsche would produce an updated model only to make it slower? If the engine is improved with more low end torque and hp, if the aero is improved, then why would it be an inferior product? doesn't make sense to me.
Updated model of the same car should be faster, but not clear whether .2 GT3 should be faster than .1 RS. I can see it going either way.
Old 09-24-2018, 05:43 PM
  #204  
btrigg
Advanced
 
btrigg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Drove three days at Mosport with .2RS. Found it to be much stiffer
Old 09-24-2018, 07:16 PM
  #205  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 810 Likes on 424 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by btrigg
Drove three days at Mosport with .2RS. Found it to be much stiffer
It is. Noticeably.
Old 09-25-2018, 11:56 AM
  #206  
A/S
Burning Brakes
 
A/S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: U.S.
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 283 Likes on 130 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Manifold
Key question is what tires the .2 RS was on. Interesting that .1 RS came out a good bit faster than .2 GT3. As always, track conditions, driver, etc. can affect the results, so need to take these numbers with a grain of salt and try to aggregate data points to get a better sense of how things compare.

Just in case I get an RS allocation and decide to go for it, I ran a spec this morning and the price came to $194,300, which isn't too bad.
The 991.1 GT3 RS vs. 991.2 GT3 performance difference comes down to track layout dependency. If the track has high speed corners where downforce is important, the 991.1 RS builds the gap. If the track has straights connected by slow turns, the 991.2 GT3 can match or run better than the 2016 RS.

Then there is the tires difference. .2 GT3 has better tires, but .2 GT3 RS and 991 GT2 RS have even better tires, and the sizes are identical to the 918 Spyder/991.1 GT3 RS, so no idea why a 918 Spyder or 991.1 GT3 RS owner would buy slower tires, when faster ones are available for a similar price.

991.2 GT3 has a little extra power over the 991.1 GT3 RS (and let's not talk mid range, because using this range on track days belongs to DE Students group), but 991.1 RS has a more aggressive R&P gear, and also fits really wider tires than the GT3 cannot fit (295/345 fit under the fenders in the RS, GT3s max out around 265/315).

For regular drivers and not this media/internet/magazine tests, the biggest difference is in the operators, and by several seconds per lap.
Old 09-25-2018, 01:00 PM
  #207  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 810 Likes on 424 Posts
Default

Porsche is pretty good with reporting performance stats. Pretty accurate. I think we are all knocking ourselves silly for nothing. PAG wouldn't put out the .2 GT3RS that is not faster than the .1 GT3RS.
Old 09-26-2018, 11:31 AM
  #208  
bccars
Three Wheelin'
 
bccars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,416
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A/S
991.2 GT3 has a little extra power over the 991.1 GT3 RS
For what it's worth, that is contradicted by the Dundon dyno !
Old 09-26-2018, 05:13 PM
  #209  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 810 Likes on 424 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FerchoPorsche
Some feedback on the .2 RS, can't really compare to .1 RS, but had good seat time on GT3 991.1-PDK (with track alignment and DSC controller), so I'll make some comparisons wrt to that car.
(This long review is for those that are waiting for the car, with the hope it alleviates the agony)

Conditions:
Drove the car from Chicago to California (yes, I was REALLY excited about that)
Tire pressure, exactly what's on the manual : 29/33 (F/R)
Tires MSCP2
Weather, all conditions : Sunny, Cold, Rainy, Pouring, Extremely Hot, Dry, Humid.
Spec (main ones): PCCB, FAL, Aluminum Pedals, extended range tank, Bucket seats.... Black. w/Aurum wheels

I did proper break-in, with oil/filter change around half way.

Driving overall :
The overall feel for the drive is superb, its firm yet compliant. On obscenely bad roads you have to survive it, it does not shine, as expected.
The road noise is significant, its more than GT3. But it is not ridiculous. Since I was driving stretches of 8 hours, I did wear earplugs occasionally, I alternated with noise cancelling headphones. (I prefer earplugs, so I could hear the alarm of another device that I had in the car -that helps in reducing the cost of the experience-). I DID enjoy the drive with naked ears from time to time, the engine sound under acceleration is VERY nice, but at constant speed it gets to you after few hours (any repetitive sound does, you could say).
The bucket seats are AMAZING, I had zero trouble, and I found them very comfortable.... Previous car was 18-way, I must say I prefer the Buckets (18-way is better if you want to rest your head on the seat, but if you lean your head forward a tiny bit -as if you had a helmet- bucket seats are just perfect for me)

Engine sound:
WOW.
It all starts with starting the engine... instant orgasmic experience. It starts the engine with a boost at 2K or so RPM, then it comes down -it stays a tiny bit longer than GT3 and I think higher-. I **believe** they play with the exhaust valves, it sounds real deep at start, can't tell for sure, but I CAN tell is that every time I started the car at the gas stations -and had many of those- it was always a happy time.
There is SOMETHING about the engine sound that inspires confidence, yes, I admit its very subjective, but I don't feel any strain or stress at all.
You feel the engine sound more than the exhaust sound (I'd say it was the opposite the GT3 I was driving). Its a very natural sound, not loud, just strong and solid. I did NOT feel the sound excessive at all, on the contrary, it feels very pleasant. (Can't say the same thing for road noise)
The GT3 was higher pitch than this car.
The upshift is very different (the PDK programming -system?- is very different than reference GT3, more on that later). Under acceleration, and it doesn't need to be all out, just a bit of aggression, the upshift makes like a "pneumatic / semi-explosion" sound that is really nice and contributes to the experience. I LOVE this detail.

Transmission:
The programming (I don't know whether there are actual mechanical differences with .1, I'm guessing there are) is very different.
In Normal mode, the downshifting it seems to "skip" gears to land in the eventual gear you need to be when releasing the break pedal. Most of my breaking was normal road breaking, did a couple of harder ones -nowhere near track level- to try out the downshifting and still feel skips gears, you don't feel traction change on rears nor engine level sound variation (Maybe I need to try other things, my driving was mostly on highways, not lots of breaking.... as I write this I'm hesitating myself )
In PDK Sport, you get the usual rev matching that we all love and praise.... but its, again, different than GT3.1.... its smoother and more precise -in the sense that revs might be matched better and less friction change-.
The upshift is glorious on either PDK mode, being more enjoyable if you are applying good throttle.

Stearing:
Others mentioned this, its "lighter" than GT3. But its absolutely responsive. I'm guessing you'll need to be very progressive and smooth on all your inputs (not just steering).
I **believe**, like others ventured, that it might be toe setting, but it does feel like you need to be very smooth, the car just turns very aggressively. I think I like harder steering feel better, but this is not a problem at all, just a difference in feel and perception. (Don't think it'll affect negatively on the track AT ALL)
Also, I think the programming/steering ratios are different.

Power delivery:
I think I now know why they say the mid-range power is better.... you will feel like a turbo kicking in at around 5.5K RPM.... then again around 7.5K or so. Very different delivery than GT3 of reference, to the point that in one particular turn that I usually take on my joy rides, the car felt like it "jumped" forward, instant smile and usual "out loud WOW".
Did couple of Launch Control on safe and deserted roads, it was awesome. The TC is certainly more permissive than GT3, I had to abort one as the traction difference between R/L was too big and had to fight the steering wheel. Absolutely shocked by the power to the wheels on 2nd and 3rd gear, it did NOT feel like 50HP difference, the power band in higher revs is awesome.

Braking:
Its basically same as GT3, I just feel that it doesn't dive as much, which I love ! (Attributing this to harder suspension).
Very very stable under braking, didn't do race condition, but couple of hard ones made me smile.

Interior:
Its basically the same as GT3, few details here and there (I didn't care much about that, other than looking similar to previous, and it didn't disappoint)
Nice touches I wasn't expecting, again I didn't care about interior, the seat belts, door handle -if you can call it that- are silverish, which matches the stitching .... nice touch. And it has a back up camera, which again I did not expect, but gladly take.
Bose sound system is OK, at low speed it sounds great, you'll have to increase volume due to road noise.
Smells good, different than GT3 (can't describe odor)
Steering wheel feels very nice, its marginally smaller, still good visibility of the dashboard, no interference whatsoever. (I use the steering wheel as high as I can, and seat as low as I can, in those settings and with my height -5'10"- the steering wheel column blocks a bit of dashboard so I go bit lower, so I'm guessing I'm sitting lower than GT3, maybe due to bucket seats ?)

Looks:
I did not expect to look particularly good -its another 911-, but I gladly admit I was wrong, it looks stunning. Very aggressive, very sporty, those wide hips, with the big wing, its just awesome !


Its a fantastic car. (I'm happy I switched from .1 GT3, whether the price difference is worth it, that's a very subjective topic, I think you get a magnificent experience with both, I'm enjoying the current one)

I'll say something else once I have a chance to go to a track that I have reasonable experience already.
This pretty much nails my impression of the .2 3RS after some of my own seat time. It is noticeably different in loudness, suspension, PDK, and quickness in reving and power off the jump and at 5k rpms up when comparing the .1RS
Old 10-01-2018, 08:51 AM
  #210  
greenhorn
Advanced
 
greenhorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 89
Received 33 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Disclaimer: everything below refers to on track performance, if you don’t plan on tracking, either of the cars is amazing and will give you plenty of joy on the road.

I recently managed to drive both .1 RS and .2 RS over two sunny days at Spa.
My initial impressions from driving the cars at Hungaroring (posted earlier in this thread) were amplified to a surprising degree.

I arrived planning to get the .1RS below 2:40.
Before I managed to warm myself up over a couple of sessions in heavy morning traffic I saw a .2 RS post a 2:36.5…
Impossible I thought. Not even on fresh trofeos. He must have gone straight through Eau Rouge.
I anticipated to see the .2 RSs dip into the 2:38s but not 2:36.

That is GT2 territory. With Manthey setups, pro drivers and stuff.

Managed a 2:40.9 in the .1 RS before lunch (on Cup2s).
Thought I could get it in the 2:39s in cool afternoon air without traffic but it became obvious that the .2 RSs are out of reach in terms of ultimate pace. Another .2RS driver posted a low 2:37.

Being lucky enough to be able to do so I decided to see for myself what the fuss was all about. So I jumped into the dunlop equipped .2 RS.
First session,
First hot lap 2:39.0
Second hot lap straight after that 2:37.7…
Drove slowly back to the pits, checked the monitor displaying official timing – 2:37.7
That was on the same tires I used in Hungary – they already had about 2 days of hard running in them and another two days of slower pace driving.
Wing in low downforce position, no alignment, no corner weights. Car was as delivered off the showroom floor.

Spent the second day trying to see if I can catch up to the fastest guys. Traffic was an issue. Ran patiently all day trying not to ruin my tires.
Once traffic cleared after 4PM, I managed to do 3 laps within a tenth of a second around the 2:37 mark.
Two last laps were very high 2:36s.
None of them were perfect. Combined best sectors in racechrono show a theoretical best of 2:36.11… on used dunlops

Now, where do the four seconds come from?

This time around I noticed the difference in stiffness between the cars. The stiffer springs of the .2 keep the car planted at all times, most significantly when you mess up in a corner and want to make a minor correction be it with the brake, throttle or steering.
In the .1 RS any movements once the car is set in a corner result in either oversteer or understeer. The weight transfer on the softly sprung car is too significant.
The .2RS masked my sloppy driving.
Traction control intrusions, once they happen, are more nuanced and subtle. For the first time I thought I could gain some time by switching traction control off.
In the La Source hairpin and bus stop chicane before that I think I could have managed the slight exit oversteer myself. But that would be true for both cars. All the other 120mph+ corners contained my bravery and TC stayed ON at all times.

Straightline speed is very similar, so don’t think much time is made there.
Stability braking into a corner, room for small corrections once in a corner and fast exit are where it’s at.
Shifts are faster, but again it’s not where all the time is gained.

I see myself doing a 2:36.5 in perfect conditions. I don’t see why a competent driver with fresh sticky rubber and clear air couldn’t do a 2:35.

If you’re after laptimes, the two cars are worlds apart.

I’m not sure Porsche intended for the .2GT3RS to be that good

Here’s the 2:36.98 lap

2:40.96 lap in the .1RS
The following users liked this post:
DK7 (04-28-2020)


Quick Reply: .2GT3RS driving impressions vs .1GT3RS



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:47 AM.