Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Breakdown over 24 second Nurburgring lap improvement 991.1 RS vs 991.2 RS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-19-2018, 08:18 PM
  #31  
gago1101
Rennlist Member
 
gago1101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 835
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG

N1 (was N0 on .1) and is similar in compound and performance to the N2 on the .2 RS - quite confusing as the N number refers to different compound depending on the size/application...
^this has been mentioned before, but are we sure .2 GT3 had the same compound tires as the RS running the Nurburgring? I suspect the .2 RS has/had the special compound tires regardless of the nomenclature.
Old 05-19-2018, 09:02 PM
  #32  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,766
Received 4,720 Likes on 2,691 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gago1101


^this has been mentioned before, but are we sure .2 GT3 had the same compound tires as the RS running the Nurburgring? I suspect the .2 RS has/had the special compound tires regardless of the nomenclature.
Correct, the RS had special R tires for the sub-7 minute lap. The standard tires for the RS are N2 which are same/similar rubber as N1 on GT3 now...
Old 05-19-2018, 09:41 PM
  #33  
SCCAForums
Pro
 
SCCAForums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Typically at a race track near you!
Posts: 720
Received 79 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Anyone know how can we order the new RS with the 'R Spec' tires?

Best Regards,
Dave
Old 05-20-2018, 02:36 AM
  #34  
Daniel Hack
8th Gear
 
Daniel Hack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I live in Luxembourg (Europe), about an hour’s drive from the Ring.

A friend of mine stopped over at Rinaldi Racing shortly after the record was set and a few pro drivers where there as well. Since he knows them and meets them regularly, they opened up and told him that the new tires were responsible for around 20 seconds...

Just word of mouth, of course, but as for me, I am very happy that I bought a second hand phase 1, instead of sheding 50k more an a phase 2.

Not that I will notice the difference anyhow
Old 05-20-2018, 03:41 AM
  #35  
Mika911
Racer
 
Mika911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: London
Posts: 487
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Daniel Hack
I live in Luxembourg (Europe), about an hour’s drive from the Ring.

A friend of mine stopped over at Rinaldi Racing shortly after the record was set and a few pro drivers where there as well. Since he knows them and meets them regularly, they opened up and told him that the new tires were responsible for around 20 seconds...

Just word of mouth, of course, but as for me, I am very happy that I bought a second hand phase 1, instead of sheding 50k more an a phase 2.

Not that I will notice the difference anyhow
That would then make it signifantly slower than the GT3 (assuming that was really on regular tyres), so reckon that may have been said due to the euphoria.

Agree with your logic on gen1 vs gen2.
Old 05-20-2018, 01:13 PM
  #36  
bigmacsmallfries
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
bigmacsmallfries's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 402
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

What’s the weight difference between the .1 gt3 rs and the .2 gt3 rs/weissach/magnesium wheels?

Ive heard that the .1 is lighter even when the .2 is equipped with the weissach package.

Thanks!
Old 05-20-2018, 01:37 PM
  #37  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,338
Received 1,586 Likes on 734 Posts
Default

Mine is 3220lb with 1/4 tank of fuel.
ST rotors, side muffler delete, and 19” Forgelines save a lot of weight.

Nothing removed otherwise; OEM battery, BBI roll bar, two 6 Point harnesses, full leather, wheel tool and manuals on board.
So it doesn’t take that much to get a .1RS below 3200.
Old 05-21-2018, 05:46 AM
  #38  
s4corrado996tt
Instructor
 
s4corrado996tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 246
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
Driver: - 10 seconds

Drivers get bigger cajones every year.

#Evolution
Really! Is that so?
Old 05-21-2018, 01:13 PM
  #39  
bigmacsmallfries
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
bigmacsmallfries's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 402
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I've looked at curb weights of the 2016 RS vs the 2019 RS with Weissach package and magnesium wheels. It appears that the '16 is lighter than the '19 even with these costly options on top by about 10lbs give or take.

So can we conclude if we took a stock '16 RS, threw on some PSC2R tires, installed an aftermarket track coilover suspension (to approximately double the spring rate at the front, 40% higher at the rear), with the same driver, same conditions that the 991.1 RS would get a lap time of about 7:03?

The difference of 7 seconds would be due to having 20hp less (3-4 second hit), less aggressive aero (2-3 second hit), and the other changes to the suspension. In other words, they're overall very similar cars.
Old 05-21-2018, 01:26 PM
  #40  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,338
Received 1,586 Likes on 734 Posts
Default

FWIW,

At Sebring stock with side muffler delete I ran 2:15x.

GT3.2RS spring rates, diffuser, 19" forgeline lb? Hoosier R7 lb? and ST rotors VS steel lb? it runs 2:12x
The rotors by themselves were good for .5 seconds.

Weight is one thing of course and the other is center of gravity on 19", as well as Hoosier R7 grip VS N1, N2 and N2R in their prime...
I could insulate and split tire performance VS weight and ride height by raising the car up and run the N2 tires one day.
Old 05-21-2018, 06:24 PM
  #41  
997rs4.0
Race Car
 
997rs4.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Europe
Posts: 4,478
Received 110 Likes on 56 Posts
Default


Porsche had a few guys driving at the days of record trying laps. Conditions where very good. More laps recorded under 7min. Rumors are that some laps were “cleaner” than the one we have seen. But a couple of tenths slower. So record is a record. Hats off.
Suspension and tires on gen2 is the biggest improvement. HP maybe 2sec? Drivers are very consistent.
Gen 1 was harder to trust at the limit and was also driven in less than ideal conditions.
Gen2 gt3 and gen2 RS is a very nice evolution of already good cars.
The new tarmac in some key areas also makes a big difference. Maybe more than 2-3sec.
Old 05-21-2018, 06:32 PM
  #42  
isv
Pro
 
isv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bigmacsmallfries
I've looked at curb weights of the 2016 RS vs the 2019 RS with Weissach package and magnesium wheels. It appears that the '16 is lighter than the '19 even with these costly options on top by about 10lbs give or take..
it was widely stated at launch the change in EU regs meant car kerb weights are not necessarily comparable. In some of the launch videos Preuninger did say the .2 rs like for like was lighter by 16kg or something like that iirc.
Old 05-21-2018, 06:51 PM
  #43  
terrybGT3MR
Rennlist Member
 
terrybGT3MR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Posts: 76
Received 47 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I’ll be driving mine at the Ring this week (Friday) and really looking forward to it. I’ll report back about my findings on the difference between the 2, from a mere mortal’s drivers seat
Old 05-22-2018, 05:56 AM
  #44  
s4corrado996tt
Instructor
 
s4corrado996tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 246
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by bigmacsmallfries
I've looked at curb weights of the 2016 RS vs the 2019 RS with Weissach package and magnesium wheels. It appears that the '16 is lighter than the '19 even with these costly options on top by about 10lbs give or take.

So can we conclude if we took a stock '16 RS, threw on some PSC2R tires, installed an aftermarket track coilover suspension (to approximately double the spring rate at the front, 40% higher at the rear), with the same driver, same conditions that the 991.1 RS would get a lap time of about 7:03?

The difference of 7 seconds would be due to having 20hp less (3-4 second hit), less aggressive aero (2-3 second hit), and the other changes to the suspension. In other words, they're overall very similar cars.

Very interesting assumption!
Old 05-22-2018, 11:13 AM
  #45  
Petevb
Rennlist Member
 
Petevb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,728
Received 704 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bigmacsmallfries
I've looked at curb weights of the 2016 RS vs the 2019 RS with Weissach package and magnesium wheels. It appears that the '16 is lighter than the '19 even with these costly options on top by about 10lbs give or take.
Much of that’s due to the lithium battery, which is no longer available on the ‘19. Equipped with the same battery the ‘19 with Weissach will be considerably lighter.


Quick Reply: Breakdown over 24 second Nurburgring lap improvement 991.1 RS vs 991.2 RS



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:16 PM.