Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

My potentially unpopular thoughts on the GT3 as track car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2018, 02:33 PM
  #31  
parkerfe
Burning Brakes
 
parkerfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 237 Likes on 142 Posts
Default

To use a motorcycle nomenclature, the GT3 is a "dual-sport" car.
Old 04-16-2018, 02:35 PM
  #32  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,520
Received 1,730 Likes on 916 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by astolfor
+1
curious about your Porsche Norwell story....

Originally Posted by soulsea
I tracked a 991 4.0 cup car about a month ago for the first time.

It really gave me a perspective on what the differences are between a true race car and track capable street car, that's why now I look at tracking street cars more as a fun diversion to see what's in them rather than a true indication of ultimate performance. That's also why I decided that moving forward I'll either buy a cup car or rent seat time in one whenever I really want to push myself and for the feel of exhilaration.

That said, I don't think there is a brand out there that manages to get as much race car into a street legal car mrs than Porsche, in both performance and reliability, in the GT3 and more so in the RS variants ... but it will never be the same same thing.
yup
Old 04-16-2018, 02:50 PM
  #33  
Mika911
Racer
 
Mika911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: London
Posts: 487
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

I track/race a 996 Cup and track a 991RS (which is not too dissimilar to the GT3) and am always in awe of the RS. Yes there's a load more flex in the car, but it maintains very high and consistent performance levels and almost the same laptimes as the Cup. Whilst I get a proper workout in the Cup, the RS does everything without too much effort, but it's so efficient and still feels so mechanical that it's a great tool for a fun trackday. I do come across many with the same view as you, but get out on track with a couple of buddies in similar cars and I'm fairly sure you'll fall in love with the car. Imv every car is fun on track when you find the limits and the GT3 is about as good as it gets for a road car.
Old 04-16-2018, 02:54 PM
  #34  
Catorce
Banned
 
Catorce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,609
Received 73 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mooty
good repoer
bur the observation is not new
this is a STREET cruiser than can be used in track. it is NOT a track car per se. once this is understood t does a great job for what it is. if u want a TRACK car, then radical, gt4cs, gt3 cup car. then all questions will be remedied
I always love deciphering your posts. Google translate should have a Mooty language selection
Old 04-16-2018, 02:59 PM
  #35  
golfnutintib
Rennlist Member
 
golfnutintib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: ..............
Posts: 3,859
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

the points about weight and form factor are relevant

once again it is all relative

track a mustang gt350r 3750 lbs corvette z06 3550 lbs audi r8 3650 lbs and the gt3 feels light and maneuverable - track use brutally exposes the fallacy of the current trend of heavy sports cars... it is a just a joke ... the gt3/rs lives on that spectrum but definitely at lower end - you don't wear these cars like sports cars of old... you sit in them and feel you are steering the helm of a motorboat waiting for the damn nose to turn

porsche has intentionally built new gt cars softer and easier to drive faster for more people... the big wide long platform makes it oh so stable... let's beginner and intermediate drivers get away with murder with bad turn in, mid course adjustments, club foot on throttle....serious track use by advanced drivers need stiffer springs pretty much out of the box to manage dive and squat... but it is a very smart commercial objective and porsche is laughing all the way to the bank

if it is a curvy track, spec boxsters and stripped out e46 m3 racers will run down and pass a gt3 lol

but we still want these cars cuz they are fun, well made, exciting and pretty much better than all other streetable alternatives!
Old 04-16-2018, 06:54 PM
  #36  
KBS911
Rennlist Member
 
KBS911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,946
Received 131 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

Sorry, don't get it. Heavy? Compared to what. Generally, over the years most race cars have gotten bigger, heavier, have longer wheel base, wider track, etc. Is that a bad thing, or just progress. The modern GT3 will run with or better than older Cup cars. I have friends with older GT3C (2000) cup cars and that race historic air cooled cars. Track with them often. New GT3's are simply faster given the average driver. Bigger, heavier, yes, but compare those same cars to the race cars 20 years prior. Progress. Mind you, that's not to compare modern race cars to current GT3's/RS's. Track specific cars of any age are much lighter than their civilian counterparts. We live in amazing times!
Old 04-16-2018, 07:19 PM
  #37  
Slip
Racer
 
Slip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 366
Received 100 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by golfnutintib
agree w joe's comments on this 100% - one's perspective is all a function of what one has as a frame of reference

grip is real good on a cup 2 unless u compare it to a true slick
gt3/rs is really good on track till u compare it to a cup car
hellcat 700 hp is fast off the line until u compare it to a dragster

gt3/rs is a dual purpose car that can be driven on the street yet provide thrills on track without melting
+1 it's all relative. I would take the cup car every day as a "track weapon" (compared to the GT3/RS) but this is what it was specifically designed for. The flip side is I can't drive it home and it needs a lot more backup support at the track with mechanics etc.

The GT3/RS's are a good as it gets for dual purpose cars that can be driven daily and still hold their own on the track. In reality there is only a small percentage of owners who will ever reach 100% of what these "road cars" are capable of doing on the track anyway.
Old 04-16-2018, 07:51 PM
  #38  
ChoyV
Racer
 
ChoyV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 407
Received 35 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by _fletch
I pretty much agree with all of this, and the other posters above as well (all of which have been refreshingly civilized!!).

Yes point of reference is everything and I should clarify that I didn't mean to compare it to race cars (but I did sorry!). I guess my main beef is with many of the reviews and some of the posts on here that make this thing out to be 'the race car you can drive on the road' etc etc. I think this aspect of it was wildly over-blown and exaggerated. As other's have pointed out, this is a street car that is track capable, not the other way round as some reviews make out.
Most of the mags reviews are telling us that it is a track CAPABLE car that is also a civilized street car. I am sure SOME are suggesting that it is a great race car but I haven't read one yet. Most of their reviews, if not all, are doing a comparison with previous 911/GT3. And in that comparison, they can sum it up as a better, track car than previous 911 GTs. The demographics of Porsche ownership is changing with time. I am sure that Porsche have done it due diligence in researching the WANTS, maybe NEEDS for some. The creature comfort with the addition safety requirements made the car heavier.
Old 04-16-2018, 08:08 PM
  #39  
_fletch
Racer
Thread Starter
 
_fletch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Southern California
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChoyV
The creature comfort with the addition safety requirements made the car heavier.
I'm interested to know the actual safety requirements that made production cars go heavier in the past 20 years or so. Honest question. I know 'safety' gets banded about a lot as the reason, even by Porsche, but I've never actually known what these actual requirements are that require adding more weight?

I'm fascinated by this, and how come Miatas/MX5s, or for that matter Smarts, Fiat 500s etc can keep their weight down? Is it a power to weight ratio thing? I can't imagine the crash test speeds change depending on a cars HP or top speed.
Old 04-16-2018, 08:26 PM
  #40  
daveo4porsche
Rennlist Member
 
daveo4porsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 5,319
Received 3,616 Likes on 1,768 Posts
Default

Side impact for one

the lesser cars don’t chase the 5 star ratings

i don’t believe either the Miata or Fiat do very well in their crash testing - but the internet will correct me.
Old 04-16-2018, 08:52 PM
  #41  
Jimmy-D
Race Director
 
Jimmy-D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Midwest
Posts: 11,195
Received 1,389 Likes on 720 Posts
Default

Great thread.

i do not track but as much as I love the .2 it just looks so big in my garage. I know the GT4 is not that much smaller but just looks and feels smaller.

Drop the 4.0 Liter in the GT4, with a minimum 450 HP, and take some weight out of it and you have the perfect Street/ Track car

And yes- the .2 has slight body roll and the GT4 has none but I am sure that could be negated with some adjustments
Old 04-16-2018, 09:35 PM
  #42  
CDinSing
Rennlist Member
 
CDinSing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Melbourne, Florida
Posts: 747
Received 168 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

The OP complained that the hype from reviewers made the car sound too much like a track weapon. We all agree it is soft compared to a true race car or even a street based track car like a Cup, but to be fair to the reviewers they usually are comparing against all cars they’ve tested and believe their readers can easily go buy. That limits their comparative pool to street cars and manufacturer built track tuned models. Name a more focused track car you can walk into a show room and buy from a major manufacturer that fits your criteria of light, fast, and responsive? I have done this exercise too many times and when I add reliable to the criteria, I always come to the same answer GT3/RS.
Old 04-16-2018, 09:57 PM
  #43  
brownan
Rennlist Member
 
brownan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NYC & Monkton, MD
Posts: 1,167
Received 202 Likes on 100 Posts
Default

GT3 is a super street car. It's no race car. Anyone who has driven a race car won't confuse the two.
Old 04-16-2018, 10:03 PM
  #44  
Houston GT3
Racer
 
Houston GT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 267
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I would love to have a cup car, but I'm told the maintenance would kill me So it's fun to drive my GT car back & forth from the track & enjoy being a wanna be racecar guy for the weekend.
Old 04-16-2018, 10:09 PM
  #45  
wmond
Racer
 
wmond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: NJ
Posts: 353
Received 39 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Great thread, love the thesis here. Gold star to everyone on civility and respectful opinion sharing.

I love that fletch has identified some shortcomings, from his perspective, with the car that most everyone else thinks are positives (given the compromise that this car is able to offer, unlike almost any other car available). As a patiently waiting for an August build/September delivery lurker here, this is exactly what I want to read about. So I can live vicariously through y’all for now, and make sure that I’m making the right decision. And so I can continue to answer my son’s ongoing question du jour, “dad, can the gt3 beat that car? How about that one? That one? What about that one?” As we drive down the STREET. Until they start letting actual race cars drive on the street, or everyone around these parts starts driving RSs and Lamborghinis, I can still keep saying “yes, I think so.”



Quick Reply: My potentially unpopular thoughts on the GT3 as track car



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:06 PM.