Georg Kacher calling it - 992 GT3 is turbo (410kw)
#181
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
But in the types of protocols that have been used to simulate city and highway driving, the engine is driven very mildly and there has been a big advantage to having a smaller displacement turbo motor (that never gets near full boost in the testing cycles).
Seems this is starting to change though (where the testing will more closely approximate normal driving).
#182
Rennlist Member
With particulate filters, I bet that will decrease hp and sound. Porsche doesn't really want to make a new GT3 with less hp, so the only way is to go FI or hybrid. Even if they can somehow magically reduce the weight by 1000 pounds, the marketing department will veto it as a new GT3 cannot make less hp than the old GT3.
Just my guess. We will see.
#183
Rennlist Member
Just because in the eyes of the government, if you are having a better MPG, you are polluting less. and FI given the same hp output will usually have a higher MPG.
#184
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#185
#187
From what I was told 90% or more is accurate at the secret 918 intro event in Miami a few years ago when speaking to some of the design people and engineers.
#188
Three Wheelin'
I can tell you that if someone said it happened at event, a few things might need to be defined as "90%".....of what? A few years ago.....992 GT3 planning team within GT dept had maybe 90% of a "target list" proposed, engine spec possibilities, HP targets, content, and broad specs like options, tires, wheels, etc based on what was known but so much changes from quarter to quarter when development and testing is proceeding. 90% "finalized" to me means you could do a hypothetical configurator today and most of what you see is accurate and only options might change and that simply isn't the case. An example is, carbon fiber wheels are on target spec to be offered as a option, but that can't be 90% today because many other departments must sign off on the ok to proceed to make the final production cut. So again, to say 90% is finalized to me is not a accurate statement as of today and certainly even less so a couple years ago.
Last edited by sccchiii; 03-28-2018 at 06:50 PM.
#189
#190
Three Wheelin'
#191
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,438
Received 3,788 Likes
on
2,193 Posts
But in the types of protocols that have been used to simulate city and highway driving, the engine is driven very mildly and there has been a big advantage to having a smaller displacement turbo motor (that never gets near full boost in the testing cycles).
Seems this is starting to change though (where the testing will more closely approximate normal driving).
Seems this is starting to change though (where the testing will more closely approximate normal driving).
#193
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#194
#195
Race Director
When driven vigorously, the smaller displacement turbocharged motor uses just as much fuel and pollutes just as much as the NA motor.
But in the types of protocols that have been used to simulate city and highway driving, the engine is driven very mildly and there has been a big advantage to having a smaller displacement turbo motor (that never gets near full boost in the testing cycles).
Seems this is starting to change though (where the testing will more closely approximate normal driving).
But in the types of protocols that have been used to simulate city and highway driving, the engine is driven very mildly and there has been a big advantage to having a smaller displacement turbo motor (that never gets near full boost in the testing cycles).
Seems this is starting to change though (where the testing will more closely approximate normal driving).