Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Help me understand Porsche's Business Model...

Old 12-07-2017, 08:42 AM
  #61  
Wild Weasel
Drifting
 
Wild Weasel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 2,027
Received 293 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mass27
I will finally "bet" that the consumer shall determine what the GT3 is "meant" for, unless of course PAG starts having requirements to purchase each of their models, other than a bag of money.
The Cayman GT4 Clubsport comes to mind.
Old 12-07-2017, 11:38 AM
  #62  
konaforever
Burning Brakes
 
konaforever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,095
Received 173 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by subshooter
I support that approach but only from Porsche's business perspective (not as a consumer of course). I've made the argument that, if demand exceeds supply, Porsche should raise the price until equilibrium is met. That is how free markets work. We can argue that the ADM is essentially doing that and then when demand dies down, the ADM goes away. But then the dealers are the ones making the additional profit instead of PAG/PCNA.
Since specific GT models come out only 1 out of 3 years or so, how do you expect them to raise the price to equilibrium? That's an iterative process and unless they change prices in real time (which no one does), the market conditions could change the next change the raise the price.
Old 12-07-2017, 12:32 PM
  #63  
subshooter
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
subshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Orleans, LA (NOLA)
Posts: 5,088
Received 2,135 Likes on 977 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by konaforever
Since specific GT models come out only 1 out of 3 years or so, how do you expect them to raise the price to equilibrium? That's an iterative process and unless they change prices in real time (which no one does), the market conditions could change the next change the raise the price.
Through market analysis before the product is launched. Every other business does this all the time to price their products. Charge what the market will bear. But then again, these same businesses will sell you their product if you are willing to buy it and have the money (of course!). That is why I don't get Porsche's business model. Make enough of the product to satisfy demand. Price the car at equilibrium.

The GT4 could have been another $10 or $20K higher in price and they would have sold all of their cars. (Recall that Porsche had to significantly increase their allocations to NA after they realized what demand was - a latent failure in their marketing analysis). Anybody paying attention to the pent up demand for a Cayman with a 3.8L in it could have figured that out before the car was released. The .2 GT3 is at least $30k under priced right now (just my guess as I have not done a lot of research on this point).....but clearly it is under priced. Don't even get me started on the 911R pricing. Prices get updated every year on the configurator. I don't see this as being difficult for Porsche.
Old 12-07-2017, 12:56 PM
  #64  
dark knight
Drifting
 
dark knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Support our troops! go USA!!!
Posts: 2,221
Received 46 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by STG
To those that think the MSRP should be increased, why not just go pay your self imposed price increase by way of an ADM??

exactly! fools.
Old 12-07-2017, 09:51 PM
  #65  
Wimankid
Instructor
 
Wimankid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Midwest
Posts: 138
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I agree with "sub shooter". They have a pricing and a distribution problem. On pricing they can charge more or adjust the price upward when they see demand so strong. Generally it is easier to set a higher retail price and then discount it down versus raising price after the car has been launched.

Most companies in large capital goods withhold slots/production for retail allocation. Dealers can place orders for stock, but retails take priority. PCNA doesn't seem to be doing that. Why would you have retail order customers having their requests go unfilled and ship other models of 911"s to dealers to sit on their lots? Other companies also penalize dealers for "false" retails - like we are seeing now, orders in the dealer's name or a family member and then have the car show up for sale with large ADMs. In terms of making more, Porsche is deciding to not make more GT3's - maybe to increase the desire for the car. They could work with their supply base and the works council at the factory to add overtime and/or partial shifts if they desired to do so.

I'll be open, I'm a frustrated customer who can't get a GT3 allocation (offered several at $25k+ ADM) at a reasonable price and now have a GTS on order.
Old 12-07-2017, 10:23 PM
  #66  
subshooter
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
subshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Orleans, LA (NOLA)
Posts: 5,088
Received 2,135 Likes on 977 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dark knight
exactly! fools.
I'm not quite sure what you mean buy your pejorative. Even if customers want to pay more than MSRP, we can't because there are no GT3 car allocations at our dealerships. Or if there are, you have to be on some special list. And as we have seen from other posters, this list doesn't mean anything since you can be slipped when another more "important" customer asks for an allocation. Porsche doesn't control the dealer's list since dealers are independent franchises and are not owned by Porsche.

Maybe I just need to move to a third world country so that I can learn how to be corrupt and bypass the process. ....but wait, I already lived and worked in a third world country and somehow I didn't pickup that skill set.

....but thank you for your insightful commentary anyway dark knight.
Old 12-07-2017, 10:34 PM
  #67  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,163
Received 3,857 Likes on 1,901 Posts
Default

The benefit of raising the MSRP to market, assuming the market clearing price is higher than current MSRP, is that you would eliminate the flip and/or dealer ADM opportunity and it would be more likely that configurable allocations go directly to the ultimate buyer. It would put more cars on the road and less in storage, and more of them would have been speccd by the person that was actually buying them in the end.
Old 12-07-2017, 10:40 PM
  #68  
subshooter
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
subshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Orleans, LA (NOLA)
Posts: 5,088
Received 2,135 Likes on 977 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
The benefit of raising the MSRP to market, assuming the market clearing price is higher than current MSRP, is that you would eliminate the flip and/or dealer ADM opportunity and it would be more likely that configurable allocations go directly to the ultimate buyer. It would put more cars on the road and less in storage, and more of them would have been speccd by the person that was actually buying them in the end.
I completely agree. It solves many problems. It will also put more money in PCNA/PAG's pockets and less in the dealership's pockets. It would make the buying process more predicable and fair for consumers and put these cars in the hands of car lovers.

The reason guys are flipping GT3RSs and making 50k in profit is because Porsche under priced the cars on initial offering. It's like an IPO investment banking team that got the price wrong (which is a big deal and failure). The 911R pricing was a huge failure by Porsche marketing. Anybody in this forum could have told them that on day minus zero.

As much as I admire Porsche marketers, they are not good at assessing demand and pricing their products. It's obvious to anybody that is really paying attention. Their marketers need core car lovers on their team to help guide them.
Old 12-07-2017, 10:41 PM
  #69  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,357
Received 3,701 Likes on 2,152 Posts
Default

Perhaps Porsche is taking the long view, and factoring in how long the cars will last (more than just a few years), how long owners will keep them, effect of pricing points on depreciation, effect of pricing points on people selling theirs cars in order to 'upgrade' to the latest model, effect on sale of their other models, etc. It's not just about selling cars and making max profit NOW, it's also about selling cars and making max profit on a sustained basis.
Old 12-07-2017, 10:46 PM
  #70  
STG
Race Director
 
STG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 0
Received 193 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by subshooter
I'm not quite sure what you mean buy your pejorative. Even if customers want to pay more than MSRP, we can't because there are no GT3 car allocations at our dealerships. Or if there are, you have to be on some special list. And as we have seen from other posters, this list doesn't mean anything since you can be slipped when another more "important" customer asks for an allocation. Porsche doesn't control the dealer's list since dealers are independent franchises and are not owned by Porsche.

Maybe I just need to move to a third world country so that I can learn how to be corrupt and bypass the process. ....but wait, I already lived and worked in a third world country and somehow I didn't pickup that skill set.

....but thank you for your insightful commentary anyway dark knight.


You willing to pay $20K over for a configurable allocation? You can have one tomorrow. I'll put you in touch.

Demand is more than supply and sellers have the upper hand. It is what it is. Many smart guys can make $20K faster for the same amount of time many here spend complaining about ADM's.

Just trying to give you an idea of the reality out there. For the right $$, anything can be had.
Old 12-07-2017, 10:51 PM
  #71  
subshooter
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
subshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Orleans, LA (NOLA)
Posts: 5,088
Received 2,135 Likes on 977 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by STG
You willing to pay $20K over for a configurable allocation? You can have one tomorrow. I'll put you in touch.
PM me. It needs to be configurable. The four closest dealers to me are saying no way. It would be European delivery so I don't care where it is coming from
Old 12-08-2017, 01:54 AM
  #72  
Jimmy-D
Race Director
 
Jimmy-D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Midwest
Posts: 11,191
Received 1,379 Likes on 718 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Manifold
Perhaps Porsche is taking the long view, and factoring in how long the cars will last (more than just a few years), how long owners will keep them, effect of pricing points on depreciation, effect of pricing points on people selling theirs cars in order to 'upgrade' to the latest model, effect on sale of their other models, etc. It's not just about selling cars and making max profit NOW, it's also about selling cars and making max profit on a sustained basis.
You are correct above.

Do not be fooled thinking that PAG are idiots and do not know how to price their products. Markets can flip at a dime so they spend a lot of time pricing it where it flat lines between the ups and downs. If the market hits the crapper do you think they lower their price they sell to the Dealers??
Old 12-08-2017, 02:01 AM
  #73  
evilfij
SJW, a Carin' kinda guy
Rennlist Member
 
evilfij's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On the internet
Posts: 6,786
Received 621 Likes on 433 Posts
Default

Try this: Hi, my name is subshooter, I would like to buy a GT3 and I am willing to pay market value. Pretty sure you will get one, although you are a bit late, allocations open up when people back out. Manhattan just sold one at $15k over although I know dealers will probably want the $3k the euro delivery costs you. As noted about, $20k would do it. Talk to the GM/sales manager. I know two of the dealers near you have sold all their allocations, but that does not mean they are actually sold or one won’t pop up.
Old 12-08-2017, 09:26 AM
  #74  
RennOracle
Pro
 
RennOracle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 683
Received 32 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by subshooter
I've bought two Porsches in the past 4 years from the same guy. But if I want a GT3 or GT3RS, I have to get on a list and they only give out their limited allocations to their best customers.....the 918 buyer, the last guy that bought 4 PTS GT3RSs and then flipped each of them 12 months later with 12 miles on the odometer for a $50k profit each. My SA mentioned that customers get pissed that although they are good customers, they are not the "best customers" and therefore don't get an allocation.....geesh.

Porsche's business model doesn't make any sense to me at all. If people want to buy a product at MSRP, why wouldn't Porsche build as many as are demanded minus 1?

My thoughts on the reasons....none of which make any sense to me.

1. Limiting production to drive demand? I can understand this for Halo cars like the 918, Carrera GT or the 959. ....but the GT3 or GT4? Nope. These are not Halo cars.

2. Limited Factory production capacity? Maybe.....but why not expand production, add a night shift or make more GT3s instead of Base 911s? They are all made at the same factory in Zuffenhausen. Build another factory.

3. Porsche needs to keep their average fleet CAFE standards within limits so they want to sell more efficient Turbo cars rather than NA cars like the GT3/4. I don't buy this argument at all. Lamborghini just came out with the fastest SUV on the planet with 650 HP......somehow they are able to produce this low MPG, high emissions car and stay afloat in the same regulatory environment. Why not build a factory in China or the US where EU CAFE standards are not applicable? Or if there is a tax for high emission cars, pass it on to the consumer and we will pay it....if they build them.

4. GT3s make less profit. Really? I doubt it. I think these cars are cash cows. How much additional R&D is necessary for the GT3? Not much I think. If they make less profit, raise the price. Demand is there to support it. GT3s making less profit? This argument makes no sense to me.

This whole Porsche allocation process boggles my mind. If I was running PAG and somebody wanted a GT3 at MSRP, I'd say put in your order and we will get it to you in 12 weeks. I'd figure out how to meet demand.

What am I missing?
First of all, if there is a car representing Porsche "Halo car" is the GT3, it's supposed to be the cup car for the street, it's these cars that represent the brand in tracks around the globe, with it's owners. 918 was a tech showdown, an halo car, but it has gone now, so GT cars are the actual Halo cars of a brand that has 90% of a line up with cars less powerful and fast than any GT car. Then, Porsche isn't making limited GT3 or GT4 or even GT2 RS, they are making as many as they can produce in a time stamp. You will ask "Why don't they make more?" Because they don't need to and they already make a LOT of them.

But even if they didn't made a lot of them, A LOT of people buy GT3's and RS because they know they can drive the **** out of it for a year or half a year, sell it, and in the worst case scenario, they will not lose money. So this could very well be part of Porsche business model, to have limited production of GT cars, but it isn't. They did limited runs of the 4.0 and GT2 RS because people were scrapping for coins and no one had ***** at the time.

You don't have an allocation, because you don't have a relationship with your dealer, try another one. Pay ADM, wait it out, or you should had remembered that you wanted one earlier and put a deposit on the car before everyone else.
As for the PTS thingy, that's a fantasy, so it's not really a "let's say" type of thing.
US has the 918 program, because they were pretty sure they wouldn't sell the 918 and it would end up like the XJ220, so they did this just to sweeten the deal and the clients that bought the 918 were pretty charitable with Porsche, remember the economy was about to tank even more in 2012-13, so people that bought them took Porsche out of a pickle, in Porsche mind, they deserved a reward. In the end they have to honor the program until today. What's your point? They flip them, so what? More cars in a limited buyers market, faster depreciation, you should be thankful.

Plus, why would Porsche sell a GT3 (RS) to you instead of the guy that deposited a LOT of trust (1M for a car in 2012 was A LOT of trust) in your brand for a car that no one really knew what to expect? Or even other people that never got a 918 but have a better car history? Or the Mootys or Trakcar of this Porsche world? What makes you so entitled to one? Money? Plenty of people have money.

But at the end of the day, if you go around, you will find an allocation, if you don't, just wait it out, Porsche pumped up so much GT cars and between this year and next there will be so many nice Porsche cars, flooding the market, that you will be able to get a nice GT3 for MRSP or less in less than a year. So don't stress it out.

And for Porsche, they don't even need to sell a lot of cars, they could sell less and be a standalone, very profitable company, as they have the biggest profit margins of any manufacturer today. So no point on diluting the brand even more.
Old 12-08-2017, 10:04 AM
  #75  
subshooter
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
subshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Orleans, LA (NOLA)
Posts: 5,088
Received 2,135 Likes on 977 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RennOracle
But at the end of the day, if you go around, you will find an allocation, if you don't, just wait it out, Porsche pumped up so much GT cars and between this year and next there will be so many nice Porsche cars, flooding the market, that you will be able to get a nice GT3 for MRSP or less in less than a year. So don't stress it out.
Thanks for your thoughtful reply and that of others. I feel better.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Help me understand Porsche's Business Model...



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:54 PM.