Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Speedster - Calling All Cleaning Ladies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2019, 12:32 PM
  #2161  
BrntRubber
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
BrntRubber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,585
Received 250 Likes on 144 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Taffy66
I have an UK GT3 RS WP coming later in the year but never put my name for a Speedster as i have a 981 Spyder which i can upgrade to a 718 Spyder if i choose to. To anyone who is offered a Speedster allocation and able to afford it, is very shortsighted to turn it down IMHO..This is a special edition Porsche for christ's sake and virtually guaranteed to be an awesome car to drive on twisty roads with the top down..Its got the new Gen RS engine with ITBs which will have an unique intake noise and an even sharper throttle response..The Manual 6 speeder is merely the icing on the cake.
When reviews get printed there will be some big regrets from people who turned one down IMO.
I agree with you Taffy. The pricing is a bit on the heavy side if you ask my honest opinion.
Old 04-25-2019, 12:36 PM
  #2162  
Whoopsy
Rennlist Member
 
Whoopsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,933
Received 1,164 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrntRubber
Interesting point on the manual not being in the 992. I can’t believe the manual dies out to the electric shaver of the 992. It will come I am sure.

Demand for manual is there and Porsche cater to demand.



Price increases like this are certainly risky and going into Ferrari/McLaren territory is risky when specs on paper are far inferior.

many people put a great deal of weight on the performance on paper and these NA cars don’t keep up.


I hope so and if this is the case my .2 3RS is a keeper for life!

that being said I can only imagine how mental the acceleration must be in a hybrid 3RS. My .2 is already fast enough for me though.


Can you share your reason why?


Can you share your reason why?
The production version is sufficiently different enough than the prototype mock up I saw in Geneva 3 years ago that I do't feel the 'want' factor anymore.

In my book, this new Speedster lost the spirit of Speedster. I would much prefer to find a nice 89, preferably narrow body, or a 94.

My take on Speedster is a topless, lightweight car that a little under powered, and small and nimble little thing. The new one definitely is't underpowered, while it's nimble it is also huge.

Well the prototype I saw was't any smaller than the production version, but it's lighter and more basic. Nor was it underpowered. I made my decision to pass perhaps 6 moths after I saw the prototype, I realize it's not a car I want. I would much prefer the original 911 Speedster. Or even a 356 Speedster. The 997 Speedster I think is already way too big to be called a Speedster.
Old 04-25-2019, 12:50 PM
  #2163  
Bhofolo
Track Day
 
Bhofolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 16
Received 12 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Taffy66
I have an UK GT3 RS WP coming later in the year but never put my name for a Speedster as i have a 981 Spyder which i can upgrade to a 718 Spyder if i choose to. To anyone who is offered a Speedster allocation and able to afford it, is very shortsighted to turn it down IMHO..This is a special edition Porsche for christ's sake and virtually guaranteed to be an awesome car to drive on twisty roads with the top down..Its got the new Gen RS engine with ITBs which will have an unique intake noise and an even sharper throttle response..The Manual 6 speeder is merely the icing on the cake.
When reviews get printed there will be some big regrets from people who turned one down IMO.
I have a strong suspicion you are spot on !
This car is going to be epic and going to be raved about, and I'm not passing up ! I think it is one of the last greats ! I am pretty old school so this car appeals to me.
Just like a Touring is not an R, the so called GT3 Cab mule we've seen, will not be a Speedster. ( For those of you concerned about the pricing )
Porsche make sure that the special models have something "extra," which they don't repeat and which will make the difference worth the while.
I have an R and a Touring. I love then both, but the R has fizz which the Touring just doesn't have.
I believe the Speedster is also going to have this fizz.
Old 04-25-2019, 01:01 PM
  #2164  
raclaims
Rennlist Member
 
raclaims's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,646
Received 313 Likes on 166 Posts
Default

I haven't heard any mention of a LWFW on the Speedster...anyone??
Old 04-25-2019, 01:02 PM
  #2165  
Whoopsy
Rennlist Member
 
Whoopsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,933
Received 1,164 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by raclaims
I haven't heard any mention of a LWFW on the Speedster...anyone??
It does't have the single man flywheel.

The new motor can't take the vibrations.
Old 04-25-2019, 01:08 PM
  #2166  
Bhofolo
Track Day
 
Bhofolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 16
Received 12 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Sorry Sir if you misunderstood me !
I was not referring to a specific difference like LWFW.
I was being more general with my observations in the driving experience of the two cars, and hence used the term fizz, as the whole experience just feels more alive.
I assume the Speedster with the ITB and open top driving will feel very,very alive at the red line !
Old 04-25-2019, 02:45 PM
  #2167  
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Whoopsy
My take on Speedster is a topless, lightweight car that a little under powered, and small and nimble little thing.
That's my take on it, as well, except I call it a Boxster.
Old 04-25-2019, 03:07 PM
  #2168  
Riz
Rennlist Member
 
Riz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 1,698
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Agree- the original 986 boxster or S both less than 2800lbs
Old 04-25-2019, 03:12 PM
  #2169  
isv
Pro
 
isv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Whoopsy
It does't have the single man flywheel.

The new motor can't take the vibrations.
The 991.2 Cup has a single mass flywheel and it's supposed to be the same engine as the road car?
Old 04-25-2019, 03:18 PM
  #2170  
9872SpeedYellowCS
Burning Brakes
 
9872SpeedYellowCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,096
Received 449 Likes on 224 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by isv
The 991.2 Cup has a single mass flywheel and it's supposed to be the same engine as the road car?
This engine is also routinely serviced and torn down. I would assume that a LWFW would be fine with this car as long as it was maintained in a similar fashion.
Old 04-25-2019, 03:19 PM
  #2171  
raclaims
Rennlist Member
 
raclaims's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,646
Received 313 Likes on 166 Posts
Default

Cup cars get rebuilt motors alll the time though...991.2 increased the interval to 100 hours I believe...used to be 50
Old 04-25-2019, 03:31 PM
  #2172  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,771
Received 4,721 Likes on 2,691 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by isv
The 991.2 Cup has a single mass flywheel and it's supposed to be the same engine as the road car?
The 991.2 Cup has a Sequential gearbox and I doubt its SMFW is the same as one that would be added to a Manual (and PDK doesn't use SMFW).
Old 04-25-2019, 03:57 PM
  #2173  
isv
Pro
 
isv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
The 991.2 Cup has a Sequential gearbox and I doubt its SMFW is the same as one that would be added to a Manual (and PDK doesn't use SMFW).
Surely if a single mass flywheel can be engineered to work with the Cup/Motorsport cars (and it clearly can), one can also be produced to do so with the road car even if it's not exactly the same part.
Old 04-25-2019, 04:51 PM
  #2174  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,771
Received 4,721 Likes on 2,691 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by isv
Surely if a single mass flywheel can be engineered to work with the Cup/Motorsport cars (and it clearly can), one can also be produced to do so with the road car even if it's not exactly the same part.
I guess if you’re willing to accept the same warranty as the Cup (None) and same service intervals. Just not sure if the Cup’s single mass unit is really light or not (not sure how it works with sequential)...
Old 04-25-2019, 04:52 PM
  #2175  
usctrojanGT3
Rennlist Member
 
usctrojanGT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 16,271
Received 3,802 Likes on 2,167 Posts
Default

Them only having the lightweight flywheel only for the Heritage Package would make it that much more of a compelling option.

Last edited by usctrojanGT3; 04-25-2019 at 05:25 PM.


Quick Reply: Speedster - Calling All Cleaning Ladies



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:43 PM.