Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2018 GT3 vs 2016 GT3 RS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-2017, 12:07 PM
  #1  
mig7410
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mig7410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 98
Received 21 Likes on 6 Posts
Default 2018 GT3 vs 2016 GT3 RS

How do you think these two cars compare now?
Old 11-22-2017, 12:10 PM
  #2  
carcommander
Rennlist Member
 
carcommander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,264
Received 277 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

I will let you know when my GT3 comes in a month. IMO if nothing else the RS has more eyeball. But I like spoilers.
Old 11-22-2017, 01:32 PM
  #3  
C.J. Ichiban
Platinum Dealership
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
C.J. Ichiban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Exit Row seats
Posts: 9,738
Received 1,954 Likes on 555 Posts
Default

More grip, bigger tires, bigger footprint, more downforce,
Old 11-22-2017, 02:05 PM
  #4  
usctrojanGT3
Rennlist Member
 
usctrojanGT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 16,271
Received 3,802 Likes on 2,167 Posts
Default

RS has a bigger coffee table wing.
Old 11-22-2017, 03:47 PM
  #5  
Marcus S.
Racer
 
Marcus S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Europe
Posts: 259
Received 27 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

RS, it is to date the best Porsche I have driven, including the 991.2 GT3, more track focused, more noise, more grip, more of everything that I want with a Porsche
Old 11-22-2017, 08:06 PM
  #6  
fxz
Race Car
 
fxz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The way to hell is paved by good intentions “Wenn ich Purist höre...entsichere ich meinen Browning” "Myths are fuel for marketing (and nowadays for flippers too,,,)" time to time is not sufficient to be a saint, you must be also an Hero
Posts: 4,446
Received 422 Likes on 250 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Marcus S.
RS, it is to date the best Porsche I have driven, including the 991.2 GT3, more track focused, more noise, more grip, more of everything that I want with a Porsche
Explain i have driven otherwise means nothing

btw on RL ppl that sold RS and later bought .2GT3 say the opposite. (so the Ring time despite thinner front rear rubbers)
Old 11-22-2017, 08:58 PM
  #7  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,338
Received 1,586 Likes on 734 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C.J. Ichiban
More grip, bigger tires, bigger footprint, more downforce,
Originally Posted by Marcus S.
RS, it is to date the best Porsche I have driven, including the 991.2 GT3, more track focused, more noise, more grip, more of everything that I want with a Porsche
that new motor though...
Old 11-23-2017, 12:36 AM
  #8  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 810 Likes on 424 Posts
Default

Nothing wrong with the RS 4.0. Still epic. Still makes the little hairs on the the back of your neck stand up when you make it scream. Goes like stink too.
Old 11-23-2017, 01:11 AM
  #9  
Nick Yoskin
Burning Brakes
 
Nick Yoskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Waxer
Nothing wrong with the RS 4.0. Still epic. Still makes the little hairs on the the back of your neck stand up when you make it scream. Goes like stink too.
yeah us mere mortals wont tell the difference.
Old 11-23-2017, 02:41 AM
  #10  
sechsgang
Rennlist Member
 
sechsgang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ...PA...
Posts: 3,941
Received 961 Likes on 456 Posts
Default

Yeah, there is a lot of "I can tell the minute difference between these motors because I was practically one of the people who developed it given the info I heard from my cleaning lady" crew here. IMHO, the 16 RS is one of the most epic cars Porsche has ever made when it comes to mixing technology and visceral experience (vs trying to go grassroots like with the 911r), and I'm rather confident the new GT3...while super cool and superior etc etc...doesn't hold up nearly enough to make it the more thrilling car.
Old 11-23-2017, 03:21 AM
  #11  
gago1101
Rennlist Member
 
gago1101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 835
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Every new Porsche, and GT3 for that matter, will be a better performer. However, RS will still be "special" no matter the performance. My incoming .2 GT3 is better in all measurable performance figures than a 1973 RS. Not sure why that damb old car costs so much, go figure.
Old 11-23-2017, 04:20 AM
  #12  
RSUV
Advanced
 
RSUV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 90
Received 56 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

I haven’t driven the .2 but love my .1 RS. I’m not on any list but don’t feel shortchanged in any way. Every brand, every manufacturer, new products are always improved technically but it doesn’t necessarily make them better cars when the dust settles. As others have said, the RS will always be an RS - the huge tyres, the massive aero, the styling, the aggression. To someone like me, who will probably not own many of these cars, getting the full hit was worth the extra. No doubt the .2 is a brilliant car in its own right and seems to be a significant improvement.

That ring time is curious. The RS has much more rubber, much more downforce, very similar power and less weight. I can’t believe gearbox shift speed makes any difference (though ratios might?) and similarly the braking system seems not to be more powerful on the newer car. The only two things I can think of are that it’s marketing/driver/track condition differences, or its suspension.

The first needs no real explanation - it is what it is and it probably sells cars. The second perhaps also plays a part. The Nürburgring is not like a normal track, really it is a road. A very fast one. I noticed the Manthey RS that went significantly quicker than the standard car actually had softened suspension to get its time (pretty sure that’s correct). That makes a lot of sense to me since I think there are occasions when my RS seems too stiff for some UK road surfaces. A little more pliancy would yield a quicker car in those instances. But this is a track-focused car. For most tracks, which are much smoother than roads, the extra body control from stiffer suspension is valuable.

Maybe there are people here who have tracked both cars, same day, who could either back up the Nürburgring time to say the new car is definitely quicker than the old RS? If it is, it would be interesting to know which part of the car gains the time because the physics on the RS (tyre size, aero) seem to favour it.
Old 11-23-2017, 04:31 AM
  #13  
RSUV
Advanced
 
RSUV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 90
Received 56 Likes on 24 Posts
Default



Zeperfs compares performance results from various Euro mags. An interesting tool. It seems to suggest the RS is quicker. Obviously not always a measure of track speed, but again, makes it all the more interesting to understand why the GT3 is quicker around the ring. I also note the new GT3 is actually lighter by a little than the RS too.
Old 11-23-2017, 04:33 AM
  #14  
evilfij
SJW, a Carin' kinda guy
Rennlist Member
 
evilfij's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On the internet
Posts: 6,786
Received 621 Likes on 433 Posts
Default

GT3 991.2 has a newer spec tire which is probably 90% of the ring time difference (if not all of it). RSUV the chart you posted compares to a manual GT3 so not too meaningful.
Old 11-23-2017, 05:23 AM
  #15  
randr
Banned
 
randr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

The 991.1 GT3 RS ring time was set when there were three speed limited zones (I believe).


Quick Reply: 2018 GT3 vs 2016 GT3 RS



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:33 AM.