Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

AutoQuest Motorsports - Titanium Caliper Piston Pucks for Failed Factory Ceramics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-2017, 06:10 PM
  #16  
AutoQuest Motorsports
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
AutoQuest Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Fort Myers, Florida
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mech33
The challenge here is, if I'm going to have to pull the pistons out anyway, then I'd consider just replacing them with the less expensive stainless steel entire piston replacements that are available for about half the cost and serve the same purpose.

BUT if I could replace these pucks without having to R&R the entire caliper assembly, then these pucks become a much more attractive.

A simple tool that lets you push down on the top of the ceramic puck (by pushing against the caliper on the opposite side) that has enough clearance to let you get the appropriate allen wrench in there to remove the screw would make this WAY more attractive IMO. Just like a normal piston spreader for brake pad changes...

I'd be tempted to just make the tool on the bench out of a few scraps of aluminum...
For your reference, we could have made a cheap set of stainless steel pucks. However, stainless steel pucks or a stainless steel piston pressing against the pads defeats the entire purpose of having the pucks there in the first place...to be a thermal barrier preventing heat transfer into the brake fluid. This is why we went with Titanium to offer similar thermal barrier properties as the ceramic but without the risk of them breaking.

Unfortunately the design of the puck and piston in the caliper doesn't allow for anything to grip onto. The pistons are recessed in the caliper and can't be removed far enough to grip onto them securely with something that wouldn't damage the piston. We feel like it is not possible to accomplish. HOWEVER...if you figure out a way to do it more efficiently than removing the pistons, without potentially damaging any of the components, you'll have a box show up on your doorstep with a "Kudos" note and some kind of handmade trophy made out of car parts haha.
Old 08-27-2017, 07:01 PM
  #17  
Mech33
Nordschleife Master
 
Mech33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,344
Received 606 Likes on 371 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AutoQuest Motorsports
For your reference, we could have made a cheap set of stainless steel pucks. However, stainless steel pucks or a stainless steel piston pressing against the pads defeats the entire purpose of having the pucks there in the first place...to be a thermal barrier preventing heat transfer into the brake fluid. This is why we went with Titanium to offer similar thermal barrier properties as the ceramic but without the risk of them breaking.

Unfortunately the design of the puck and piston in the caliper doesn't allow for anything to grip onto. The pistons are recessed in the caliper and can't be removed far enough to grip onto them securely with something that wouldn't damage the piston. We feel like it is not possible to accomplish. HOWEVER...if you figure out a way to do it more efficiently than removing the pistons, without potentially damaging any of the components, you'll have a box show up on your doorstep with a "Kudos" note and some kind of handmade trophy made out of car parts haha.
It's nothing too crazy... I'm imagining something like this (with the "fingers" end slightly smaller than the puck surface), but in a configuration similar to a caliper spreader where it pushes against the puck surface on each opposite side of the caliper and spreads just those pistons apart:



As you spread the tool, the pistons will go into the caliper until they bottom out internally against the caliper structure (I assume), and at that point you will be essentially clamping the pistons down against the caliper cavity internals themselves.

I assume that should be plenty of friction force to let you then get in and put an allen key through that center hole in the tool and loosen / remove the screw. If you make the tool symmetric, you could even loosen the screw on the pucks on both sides of the caliper at the same time. Then repeat 2 times to complete for each of the 3 pairs of pucks.
Old 08-27-2017, 07:07 PM
  #18  
Mech33
Nordschleife Master
 
Mech33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,344
Received 606 Likes on 371 Posts
Default

Or if you want to be really MacGyver, just use one of these with a hole drilled through one of the sides (so that you can insert the allen key), and use a couple of thick washers between the puck and the tool so that you only put the spreading force against the puck surface and not the rest of the caliper / dust boot.


Last edited by Mech33; 08-28-2017 at 03:55 PM.
Old 08-27-2017, 08:19 PM
  #19  
Mech33
Nordschleife Master
 
Mech33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,344
Received 606 Likes on 371 Posts
Default

Or here is something that would probably work with no mods whatsoever (just have it press against the puck directly adjacent to the screw head so you can still unscrew it, while it presses down against the puck to hold it in place against the caliper internals):


Last edited by Mech33; 08-28-2017 at 03:56 PM.
Old 09-19-2017, 01:10 PM
  #20  
malmasri
Rennlist Member
 
malmasri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: close to Mid- Ohio
Posts: 2,036
Received 49 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AutoQuest Motorsports
There wouldn't be any additional parts that go along with the job, save for brake fluid.

For your reference, a set of new calipers cost about $3500 plus the labor to replace them. That alone, labor included, is more than double that of the Titaniun puck replacements. Then also keep in mind you would have the same problem repeat itself with new calipers as they still have those same ceramic pucks, leading to duplicate costs in the future.
I have had my calipers replaced under warranty last year just before Porsche decided to change its approach and deny that claim, they did not last very long before they cracked again....I decided to use the Ti option and have done many events without an issue....a costly option but worth it if you track the car .
Old 09-19-2017, 01:47 PM
  #21  
Petevb
Rennlist Member
 
Petevb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,728
Received 704 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AutoQuest Motorsports
Titanium Piston Pucks. They offer similar thermal qualities to ceramic pucks
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't the OEM Porsche pucks Zirconia based ceramics? And don't they have less than half of the thermal conductivity of even the better Titanium alloys (transferring less than half the thermal energy to the brake fluid, which is why Porsche used it in the first place)?

It seems there's a performance vs longevity trade-off here that's being overlooked. Or do you feel that's not the case?
Old 09-19-2017, 02:09 PM
  #22  
Dr.Bill
Race Car
 
Dr.Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,690
Received 719 Likes on 394 Posts
Default

Inconel might work - is it harder to machine than titanium? (I'm assuming these pucks are 6Al4V Ti)
Old 09-19-2017, 02:50 PM
  #23  
991carreradriver
Rennlist Member
 
991carreradriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Northeast
Posts: 2,146
Received 426 Likes on 239 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mech33
The challenge here is, if I'm going to have to pull the pistons out anyway, then I'd consider just replacing them with the less expensive stainless steel entire piston replacements that are available for about half the cost and serve the same purpose.
One of the considerations is thermal conductivity of Titanium Alloy versus the stainless steel replacement pistons by a competitor versus the OEM ceramics.

I am not a scientist, but a little basic research seems to indicate that titanium alloy transfers less heat than stainless or ceramic. The impact of reduced heat transfer is somewhat confusing to me. Does this mean that pads and rotors will retain more heat?. Or does it mean that moving air will have a more advantageous effect on the heat dissipation as it will not move to the fluid as quickly?

Any thoughts by the experts?
Old 09-19-2017, 03:52 PM
  #24  
Spyerx
Rennlist Member
 
Spyerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 16,485
Received 1,730 Likes on 1,058 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 991carreradriver
One of the considerations is thermal conductivity of Titanium Alloy versus the stainless steel replacement pistons by a competitor versus the OEM ceramics.

I am not a scientist, but a little basic research seems to indicate that titanium alloy transfers less heat than stainless or ceramic. The impact of reduced heat transfer is somewhat confusing to me. Does this mean that pads and rotors will retain more heat?. Or does it mean that moving air will have a more advantageous effect on the heat dissipation as it will not move to the fluid as quickly?

Any thoughts by the experts?
it keeps the heat in the pad, and out of the caliper/fluid.

The reason these pucks are cracking is whatever pads are being used are dumping all the heat into the caliper.

Those with cracking pucks, what pads are you using?
Old 09-19-2017, 04:10 PM
  #25  
991carreradriver
Rennlist Member
 
991carreradriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Northeast
Posts: 2,146
Received 426 Likes on 239 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spyerx
it keeps the heat in the pad, and out of the caliper/fluid.

The reason these pucks are cracking is whatever pads are being used are dumping all the heat into the caliper.

Those with cracking pucks, what pads are you using?
That is my thinking. Now with even less heat transfer to the caliper and fluid, the heat has to go somewhere. So it will stay in the pad and transfer to the rotor at a greater rate. So are we now simply moving on from one problem (pucks) to warping of slotted rotors or greater cracking rate of of cross drilled rotors.
Old 09-19-2017, 05:05 PM
  #26  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,338
Received 1,586 Likes on 734 Posts
Default

Getting my pucks checked out as I write this.
Old 09-19-2017, 05:09 PM
  #27  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,338
Received 1,586 Likes on 734 Posts
Default

My shop just now:

you need 3 ceramic brake pucks, 2 for right rear and 1 for left front.
So there we go!
Strange that I need 2 for the barely used rear and 1 for the on fire usually front..
Old 09-20-2017, 01:21 AM
  #28  
Petevb
Rennlist Member
 
Petevb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,728
Received 704 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 991carreradriver
I am not a scientist, but a little basic research seems to indicate that titanium alloy transfers less heat than stainless or ceramic.
Heat transfer is a function of thermal conductivity- the higher the value the more heat transferred. The number depends on the alloy or type of ceramic and the operating temperature. Some typical values for comparison (W/m*K):

Pure Titanium- 21
316 Stainless alloy- 16
Inconel 718 (high temperature aerospace stainless alloy)- 11
Ti6Al4V (high strength aerospace grade Titanium alloy)- 7
Zerconia (high temperature, high toughness ceramic)- 3

Heat transferred through these materials will be proportional to the thermal conductivity, so if the stock pistons are Zerconia as I believe then heat into the caliper and brake fluid would be 2.3x greater with that particular Ti alloy, 3.7x greater with Inconel or 5.3x greater with the cooking grade Stainless. In reality it's more complex- the geometries and cross sections of the parts will be different, etc, however it gives a pretty good idea. Thus the data suggests to me that while Ti pistons will be a marginal improvement over stainless, from a thermal point of view they seem at least as great a detriment vs the OEM pistons.
Old 09-20-2017, 01:47 AM
  #29  
SmokinGTS
Rennlist Member
 
SmokinGTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,246
Received 170 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spyerx
it keeps the heat in the pad, and out of the caliper/fluid.

The reason these pucks are cracking is whatever pads are being used are dumping all the heat into the caliper.

Those with cracking pucks, what pads are you using?
It may be that the pads are being used right to the end and transfer the heat more efficiently. It may not be the pads you are using as much as how far you wear them down.
Old 09-20-2017, 02:21 AM
  #30  
Mech33
Nordschleife Master
 
Mech33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,344
Received 606 Likes on 371 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Petevb
Heat transfer is a function of thermal conductivity- the higher the value the more heat transferred. The number depends on the alloy or type of ceramic and the operating temperature. Some typical values for comparison (W/m*K):

Pure Titanium- 21
316 Stainless alloy- 16
Inconel 718 (high temperature aerospace stainless alloy)- 11
Ti6Al4V (high strength aerospace grade Titanium alloy)- 7
Zerconia (high temperature, high toughness ceramic)- 3

Heat transferred through these materials will be proportional to the thermal conductivity, so if the stock pistons are Zerconia as I believe then heat into the caliper and brake fluid would be 2.3x greater with that particular Ti alloy, 3.7x greater with Inconel or 5.3x greater with the cooking grade Stainless. In reality it's more complex- the geometries and cross sections of the parts will be different, etc, however it gives a pretty good idea. Thus the data suggests to me that while Ti pistons will be a marginal improvement over stainless, from a thermal point of view they seem at least as great a detriment vs the OEM pistons.
Easy enough to characterize the stock puck vs the Ti puck to determine the relative thermal conductivity between the two.

It would be nice to see vendors gather quantitative data like this.


Quick Reply: AutoQuest Motorsports - Titanium Caliper Piston Pucks for Failed Factory Ceramics



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:41 AM.