Notices
987 Forum Discussion about the Cayman/Boxster variants (2004-2012)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Install X73 Spyder version on Boxster S?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2018, 08:34 AM
  #16  
Van Larson
Rennlist Member
 
Van Larson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 1,086
Received 149 Likes on 106 Posts
Default x73

As an alternative, I went for the ST tuning coil over set up (KW1 essentially) together with Pedro garage rear bar. Mnimally firmer ride, less
roll and right height. About the same $$ As OP described.
Old 01-16-2018, 09:03 AM
  #17  
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Van Larson
As an alternative, I went for the ST tuning coil over set up (KW1 essentially) together with Pedro garage rear bar. Mnimally firmer ride, less
roll and right height. About the same $$ As OP described.
Thx. Was it minimally firmer compared to base or x73 suspension? How much lower than base?
What does "oem SS" stand for in your sig?
Why did you choose that over the x73 route?
Old 01-16-2018, 12:50 PM
  #18  
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Anyone has the f/r spring-rates for the base and x73 suspensions?
Old 01-16-2018, 01:14 PM
  #19  
MidEngineRules
Burning Brakes
 
MidEngineRules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,208
Received 255 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hf1
Looking at 981 boxsters and strongly prefer the lowered x73 look but most of the cars don't seem to have this option.

Is there a good way to just lower a 981 with base suspension without compromising anything too much? I used to have a 987.1 Boxster S with base suspension and loved it on our not always perfect NE backroads.
How does the x73 retrofit compare with the after-market suspension options?
What do you do with the base suspension parts after an x73 retrofit? Is there a market for them?

Thx in advance!


We all know Porsche options add up quick when pricing as a new car. X73 sport suspension was more expensive than PASM so that's one reason why it wouldn't have been ordered as much. Plus with PASM you got another button for your near empty console! Base cars usually had little options to begin with to keep the cost down to an entry level. Adding X73 will transform your car as written above by Okie981. X73 also includes new sway bars and the whole package is very balanced. I've had KW coilovers and KW springs on different cars when I lived in Germany. Springs only will add additional harshness to the ride for only a change in aesthetics. Coilovers can be good but they are way more expensive and you still need sway bars to balance out the package. At that point you're engineering the change. With X73, Porsche did it and based on my last 3 cars (987 Spyder, Cayman R, 981 Spyder) Porsche knows what they're doing. My guess is the discarded suspension parts would be hard to sell.
Old 01-16-2018, 02:35 PM
  #20  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,163
Received 3,858 Likes on 1,902 Posts
Default

I did the X73 conversion on my '14 Cayman S and, while I felt it was well worth the money (~$3k IIRC), it makes the ride a LOT firmer. So if you like the soft, supple ride of the standard suspension, the X73 is not for you. But if you want a more responsive car, flatter cornering and a much nicer stance, it's a great option. Note, if you do have it done, make sure to remind the tech to reconnect the PDLS wiring before they reinstall the front sub-frame. Easy to forget apparently, and the entire subframe needs to be dropped again to reconnect them.
Old 01-16-2018, 03:26 PM
  #21  
Van Larson
Rennlist Member
 
Van Larson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 1,086
Received 149 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

Ssk-short shift kit. For track/DE, you may want the sway bars (I wanted the height lowered and ride maintained as much as possible). Pedro’s garage website has his suspension upgrade info—Boxster/Cayman oriented.
Old 01-16-2018, 03:27 PM
  #22  
MidEngineRules
Burning Brakes
 
MidEngineRules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,208
Received 255 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
So if you like the soft, supple ride of the standard suspension, the X73 is not for you.
Valid point. It's easy to think most Porsche owners, especially those using this forum, are like minded in wanting the cars to corner as well as can be but still deliver excellent road manners. One reason I chose the 981 Spyder over the Cayman GT4 was that I didn't want a track car for the street. Nor the attention of the GT4 but that's off point. I have a history of owning sporty cars and sports cars since my first BMW 2002 in 1976. I'm very used to taut suspensions but I definitely don't like crashy suspensions which are jolting and loud over both low and high frequency bumps. I owned many cars which were so crashy that you had to modify the suspension just to live with it. That's no fun. The Cayman and Boxsters are so brilliant at what they're engineered to do that you simply can't lose with any suspension option. Luckily Porsche saw fit to give owners choices.
Old 01-16-2018, 03:41 PM
  #23  
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
I did the X73 conversion on my '14 Cayman S and, while I felt it was well worth the money (~$3k IIRC), it makes the ride a LOT firmer. So if you like the soft, supple ride of the standard suspension, the X73 is not for you. But if you want a more responsive car, flatter cornering and a much nicer stance, it's a great option. Note, if you do have it done, make sure to remind the tech to reconnect the PDLS wiring before they reinstall the front sub-frame. Easy to forget apparently, and the entire subframe needs to be dropped again to reconnect them.
I hear you. I get my dose of stiffness in my Moton-ed, monoball-ed 6gt3 and my SPB race car -- I have a feeling that the x73 would feel "cushy" in comparison. The more I track/race the less I seek HP and stiffness for the backroads. It's more fun to make a low-power, "cushy" car fly through the turns without losing momentum. Even the 380hp in my 6gt3 is way too much for that -- not to speak of 500 or 700hp(?!). And Porsches, even with base suspension, could hardly be described as "cushy".

Any (long-term) issues with body rigidity (creaks, squeaks) with the stiffer x73 on a convertible?
Old 01-16-2018, 06:09 PM
  #24  
MidEngineRules
Burning Brakes
 
MidEngineRules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,208
Received 255 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hf1
Any (long-term) issues with body rigidity (creaks, squeaks) with the stiffer x73 on a convertible?
Zero for me in my '11 Spyder which would count as my long-term convertible w/X73. My Cayman R was the same and I owned both at the same time. Traded both in '16. I don't recall ever hearing a creak in either car no matter the circumstance. X73 is firm but extremely quiet over bumps. Of course I can say the same from my '08 RS60 Boxster Spyder with PASM set to normal. I guess credit goes to the chassis. Porsche knows how to build a solid roadster.
Old 01-16-2018, 06:12 PM
  #25  
MidEngineRules
Burning Brakes
 
MidEngineRules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,208
Received 255 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hf1
Anyone has the f/r spring-rates for the base and x73 suspensions?
Post #12

https://rennlist.com/forums/987-981-...need-help.html
Old 01-16-2018, 07:17 PM
  #26  
Dom991.1
Burning Brakes
 
Dom991.1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,140
Received 55 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

I installed the x73 suspension on a 981 base and it is fantastic!!! Both how the car sits and how it handles. We (my wife and I) do NOT find it too harsh (and our Cayman came with the factory option of 20 inch rims). On the contrary, I found the base suspension (which i believe is the same suspension as the BASE suspension on the S) too compliant when pushed. A couple of things to think about:
  • Clearance does change when you drop the car 20mm, but I have NOT had an issue with scraping.
  • We live in Florida (relatively flat roads with minimal potholes)
  • Keep an eye on classifieds - I found an x73 suspension that had been taken off a GTS for $450, including shipping. Needed to buy the sway bars ($250 for both from Sunset + shipping) - so less than half, all in, than from Suncoast.
  • Install was about 7-8 hours, and they will need to do an alignment, obviously

Best of luck! -Dom

Last edited by Dom991.1; 01-16-2018 at 09:38 PM.
Old 01-16-2018, 07:47 PM
  #27  
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MidEngineRules
Thx! The OP got a great deal on that x73 Boxster S.
Old 10-07-2018, 07:47 PM
  #28  
CornerOffice
Intermediate
 
CornerOffice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 41
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Before and after. X73 with 14/7 spacers.



Old 10-07-2018, 08:02 PM
  #29  
Marine Blue
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Marine Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 16,022
Received 801 Likes on 465 Posts
Default

^ That looks like a proper stance now! I’m sure it’s a noticeable difference in handling too.
Old 10-07-2018, 10:58 PM
  #30  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,163
Received 3,858 Likes on 1,902 Posts
Default

It’ll settle a little lower over the first thousand or so miles after install.


Quick Reply: Install X73 Spyder version on Boxster S?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:20 AM.