Notices
987 Forum Discussion about the Cayman/Boxster variants (2004-2012)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

987.1 vs 987.2 reliability?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2017, 03:59 PM
  #16  
Kevin Rohrer
Rennlist Member

 
Kevin Rohrer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Medina, Ohio
Posts: 12,371
Received 759 Likes on 496 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Charlie C
FYI: 2012 was the last year of the 987. 2013 was the first year of the 981.
Oops, you are right.
Old 03-25-2017, 03:37 PM
  #17  
SoCal924
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
SoCal924's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vMarco
gnarfle,

Also, some people tend to say that it is simply more prone to happen on a Cayman than a Boxster... which I have no logical explanation for. Is it because Cayman are more tracked than Boxsters? Is it because the engine gets better cooling with the top down (nah I'm just joking )
As you mentioned bore scoring is also attributed to lack of proper warm up before romping on the gas pedal. Boxster being a convertible might be stored for the winter or not driven in colder weather.
The following users liked this post:
SproutSprawl LLC (02-12-2020)
Old 03-29-2017, 08:04 PM
  #18  
2mAn
Rennlist Member
 
2mAn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 459
Received 318 Likes on 126 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vMarco
Time will tell if my gambling is paying off or not. I am no expert at all and I am sure all those information could be a lot deeper or more precise but I do hope it helps you in your future buying.
Im in the same boat as the OP. The neverending complaining about the IMS really turns me off the 987.1, but I also think the DFI motor comes with its own headaches. Theres a heck of a lot more .1-S cars available and I would rather have an S vs a Base .2 even if it means I eliminate the IMS issue forever

maybe its just me, but I would take the risk too... by 06/07 the issue had been around for the better part of 10 years and with a few different evolutions of the M96 motor.
Old 03-29-2017, 09:25 PM
  #19  
Reno 911
Rennlist Member
 
Reno 911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 155
Received 142 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

FWIW, BBI Autosports (Betim Berisha) was recently on The Smoking Tire podcast and mentioned that the DFI motors are really great and bulletproof (during which he was attempting to convince Matt to buy a 997.2 C2S).
The following users liked this post:
SproutSprawl LLC (02-12-2020)
Old 03-29-2017, 10:02 PM
  #20  
9872SpeedYellowCS
Burning Brakes
 
9872SpeedYellowCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,096
Received 449 Likes on 224 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2mAn
Im in the same boat as the OP. The neverending complaining about the IMS really turns me off the 987.1, but I also think the DFI motor comes with its own headaches. Theres a heck of a lot more .1-S cars available and I would rather have an S vs a Base .2 even if it means I eliminate the IMS issue forever

maybe its just me, but I would take the risk too... by 06/07 the issue had been around for the better part of 10 years and with a few different evolutions of the M96 motor.
What headaches do the DFI motors have? I honestly have not heard of any, which is why I bought a 987.2 CS instead of a .1
Old 03-29-2017, 10:03 PM
  #21  
Tremelune
Three Wheelin'
 
Tremelune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,725
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Carbon buildup

Also, I think the 987.2 tends to be about $5-10k more expensive [citation needed]. Why pay that up front out of fear of a blown IMS?
Old 03-29-2017, 10:28 PM
  #22  
Marine Blue
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Marine Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 16,022
Received 801 Likes on 465 Posts
Default

From what I have heard the carbon buildup is caused by either a failing air/oil separator or overfillling the oil which would allow it to return into the intake plenum and cause the carbon.

But if it were truly a significant issue wouldn't we hear more people complaining about these engines? After all they have now been on the road for 8 years so they're not exactly young and there are now plenty of high mileage examples around.
Old 04-08-2017, 07:39 PM
  #23  
gnarfle
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
 
gnarfle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

So following up, today I put a deposit down on a 2009 base boxster. Pending a good PPI I'll pick up it next week.

In the past few weeks I drove a 2008 S, a 2005 S and the 2009 base. Of the 3 I liked the 2008 S best of all. That 3.4 motor really scoots and the extra power over the 3.2 S can really be felt I think. The 3.4 felt serious quick when it gets up in the revs, really pins you back, whereas the 3.2 and 2.9 just feel quick but not amazingly so.

That said, the 2008 was priced too high at $31k. Heck there is a 2009 S with reasonable milage offered up for $30k near me so... I've also decided I want to keep it < $25k to not eat into other budgets.

Looking at the options in that price range, well, there are plenty of .1 S models available but I can't shake my worry over them. Bore scoring, IMS, water pumps, oil starvation, etc etc. Yeah these things can be rare but overall it just seems like the engine design is a bit of a crap shoot whereas the newer 2.9 engine is really solid.

I honestly felt the 3.2 S and the 2.9 base were quite comparable. The S felt a little faster, but not hugely so. It felt a little tighter and flatter in the corner, but not that much. All in all they are quite close. The 2.9 I put a deposit on is lower mileage and has dealer records going back to the beginning all at the same porsche dealer. It has a bona fide manual transmission, which I think suits the 2.9 better. It's clean and I even like the color and at $23k it seems like a fine deal.

I still want the S but I concede in 99% of my driving I won't notice the difference. And this base seems like a fine place to spend a few years while waiting for 987.2 S prices to drop a bit more.

Let's hope the PPI goes well!
Old 04-08-2017, 10:01 PM
  #24  
Marine Blue
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Marine Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 16,022
Received 801 Likes on 465 Posts
Default

$23K for an 09 sounds like a smoking deal when you consider how much performance your getting.

Good luck with the PPI and hopefully we'll see you posting up some pics of the new car soon.
The following users liked this post:
qwe (09-09-2020)
Old 04-08-2017, 10:35 PM
  #25  
gnarfle
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
 
gnarfle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Yeah I thought so, haven't seen that many at this price point with such low miles. Carfax has all services performed at the same dealer it's entire life too so that's good.

Here's the listing: https://cargur.us/gbKDq

It's not super optioned but honestly there aren't many options I want anyway. Heated seats are about the only deal breaker for me. PSAM would be nice but it rides great without it IMO. Sport Chrono seems to not really be a big deal with a manual like it is with pdk. Sport exhaust would be nice but not a deal breaker.

Really what options do you really need? I kidna wish it didn't have the bose system though as I'd really like an aftermarket unit with sattelite radio and android auto, and doing that would mean ditching the factory amps and speakers... At least it has bluetooth, and I mostly listen to podcasts in the car.
Old 04-09-2017, 01:39 PM
  #26  
Tremelune
Three Wheelin'
 
Tremelune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,725
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

With the top down through the mountains, none of this will matter. All of these cars are great to drive, and a little bit of horsepower or suspension response won't be missed most of the time. $23k for a clean Boxster is about the bast bang-for-buck going in the sportscar arena today.

Drive it and enjoy it.
The following users liked this post:
Guten Tag (04-28-2022)
Old 04-09-2017, 06:58 PM
  #27  
Spokayman
Rennlist Member
 
Spokayman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 1,384
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gnarfle
So following up, today I put a deposit down on a 2009 base boxster. Pending a good PPI I'll pick up it next week.

Bore scoring, IMS, water pumps, oil starvation, etc etc. Yeah these things can be rare but overall it just seems like the engine design is a bit of a crap shoot whereas the newer 2.9 engine is really solid.
Congrats on the '09 base (I have one too).
I understand your concern about the earlier generation engines and I believe your list is correct except for the water pump. You'll be needing to watch for leakage/wear and will need to change out the water pump on your 987.2 gen car as well as miles accumulate.
Also don't forget the AOS as it too is a wear item that is applicable to both generations.
Old 04-09-2017, 11:44 PM
  #28  
gnarfle
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
 
gnarfle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Interesting... Well I watched some youtube videos and changing out the water pump doesn't look too bad. Still debating whether to wrench it myself or take it to a local independent (nearest porsche dealership is 2 hours from me), but honestly most of the work on these cars doesn't seem bad at all. The fact that you can access the top, from and bottom of the engine pretty easily (after removing some bits) seems to make access to most parts quite easy.
Old 05-19-2018, 10:59 AM
  #29  
crispy
AutoX
 
crispy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lake George, NY
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

These are my numbers... 2007 2.7 5-speed with 173,000 miles. I bought the car with 32k miles. 3 sets of pads and 1 set of rotors up front and 1 set of pads and original rotors in the rear. Original clutch. 2 sets of lower control arms after original. 1 set of tie rod ends and presently have some play. Water temp sender, water pump, coil packs and lots of tires. Castrol Syntec 5w/40 every 9,000 miles. Replacing my air/oil separator today.
This has been a GREAT car and very reliable. This was my 8th winter in the NorthEast (60 lb. sand snake secured in the back). So fun to drive this car in marginal winter conditions as a daily commuter on mountain twisties, back roads and highway. C.
The following 2 users liked this post by crispy:
873/1960 (09-10-2020), SproutSprawl LLC (02-12-2020)
Old 05-21-2018, 07:43 AM
  #30  
850tgul
Rennlist Member
 
850tgul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: South Shore of Massachusetts
Posts: 1,103
Received 559 Likes on 298 Posts
Default

For those speaking about DFI headaches, don’t forget that the the 2.9L is not a DFI motor so no worries there. Only 9A1 engine that isn’t.
I am a big advocate of the base model Caymans/Boxsters. In my mind, no Cayman/Boxster is a really fast car anyway and so the joy, to me, is really in the handling and driver input feedback on a twisty road. I actually think the base cars are sweeter in this regard as they reveal their true character at slightly lower speeds. Also for whats it worth the 265 hp in the 987.2 base feels quicker to me that the 275 hp in my previous 981 base. It’s a lovely little motor.
The following 2 users liked this post by 850tgul:
SomnoBoost (09-08-2020), SproutSprawl LLC (02-12-2020)


Quick Reply: 987.1 vs 987.2 reliability?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:38 PM.