Notices
718 Forum 982 (718) 2016-Current Discussions about 718 Boxster Cayman Variants
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Chris Harris' Take on the 718

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2016, 10:26 AM
  #31  
erik_plus8
Burning Brakes
 
erik_plus8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Europe
Posts: 784
Received 61 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

It was the 2.5l I drove. My (negative) statements apply therefore to the 2.5l.

I see no need to drive the 2.0l because I expect everything to be about the same with the 2.0l. Lag might be worse because no VGT. Sound - about the same, definitely the same characteristics. Maybe the vibrations will be a little less because of smaller moving masses. But it will never be on the same (low) level as a 6cyl.

Regarding handling improvments I had a hard time finding them during my 45min drive. OTOH, my car has X73 and the 718S had PASM. So therefore quite hard to compare. It's not a bad handling car at all. But it seems hard to detect any massive improvments. The reviewers with some amount of credibility (Chris Harris, Andrew Frankel, the Road&Track guy) do also not seem to find any huge improvement steps from 981. It is of course not worse, it just seems like a bit of "marketing speak" from PAG. The HW changes in the chassis might actually come from the substantial weight increase with the turbo engine...

O yes, the brakes were a step forward in the 718S compared to my 981. More initial bite and slightly more powerful max deceleration. Very good.
Old 06-29-2016, 05:20 PM
  #32  
Noah Fect
Rennlist Member
 
Noah Fect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,243
Received 1,303 Likes on 887 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lunarx
Those negative 718 statements are interesting, because the 718 has handling improvements and is lighter than 991.2.

The negative engine comments definetly apply to the 2.0T.
However, the 2.5T is great.

I like that 718 is doing its own thing now, to improve its game.
I'm curious if people who actually drive the 2.5T find, it a satisfying engine.
The 718 is carefully optimized to make the best possible impression on a test drive.

'Nuff said.
Old 06-29-2016, 05:22 PM
  #33  
lunarx
Rennlist Member
 
lunarx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 553
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Wow, another software cheat from VW.
Old 06-29-2016, 08:46 PM
  #34  
JCtx
Three Wheelin'
 
JCtx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
Received 179 Likes on 130 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lunarx
the 718 has handling improvements and is lighter than 991.2.
Of course a 718 is lighter than a 911. But surprisingly, it's HEAVIER than a 981, and that really surprised me. Therefore, power to weight ratio is probably a wash. The only reason the 718 is quicker is its low turbo TQ... but that's precisely what I HATE about turbo engines, so much rather have a NA H6. Also a bit immature maybe, but nothing sounds better than a Porsche H6 with PSE IMO. These kind of purchases are mostly emotional, and to me an H4T is an absolute deal-breaker as an expensive toy car. But to each his own. I know Porsche will be successful with the 718, but probably with millennials, not baby-boomers. We'll see.
Old 07-09-2016, 12:08 PM
  #35  
sjfehr
Drifting
 
sjfehr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,029
Received 66 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

I drove a 718S yesterday and really liked it. I thought the engine sounded really damned good from the driver's seat, a lot like my 987S with PSE on. Yeah, it's different but it's not bad, and still sounds good. Internet videos did not do it justice. I was also impressed with the amount of low-end torque it had; modern turbos are amazing that way. If the only reason people are finding to complain is that the exhaust doesn't sound exactly the same as older cars, that's pretty perry.

It felt all-around quicker than my 987S though not by the same margin my 987S felt faster than my old 986S.
Old 07-09-2016, 10:45 PM
  #36  
strumbringer
Instructor
 
strumbringer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 170
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by sjfehr
I drove a 718S yesterday and really liked it. I thought the engine sounded really damned good from the driver's seat, a lot like my 987S with PSE on. Yeah, it's different but it's not bad, and still sounds good. Internet videos did not do it justice. I was also impressed with the amount of low-end torque it had; modern turbos are amazing that way. If the only reason people are finding to complain is that the exhaust doesn't sound exactly the same as older cars, that's pretty perry.

It felt all-around quicker than my 987S though not by the same margin my 987S felt faster than my old 986S.
I really enjoyed my 718S test drive too. It sounds different from the 3.4 but not neccesarily (IMHO) in a bad way. Apart from being very noticeably faster, it handles noticeably better, the steering is quicker and more connected. I think they have a winner on their hands.
Old 07-09-2016, 11:39 PM
  #37  
sp330
Racer
 
sp330's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 432
Received 32 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

I think this sums up the sound issue best.

Originally Posted by "Chris Harris
but anyone with knowledge of the old car will find themselves tempering any faint praise with the knowledge that in evolutionary terms, changing from being one of the best-sounding cars on sale to one that occasionally sounds OK isn’t great news.
Old 07-10-2016, 09:32 PM
  #38  
PhilNotHill
Instructor
 
PhilNotHill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Aspen, CO 81611
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A couple of days ago we passed a 718 Cayman going the opposite way on a two lane winding mountain road. It was black and looked great. Stunning in fact.

A friend asked: how did it sound?

We were driving our 2011 Boxster S with the top down, mt and sports exhaust. We couldn't hear the 718. It might as well have been a Tesla.



Quick Reply: Chris Harris' Take on the 718



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:26 PM.