Notices
718 Forum 982 (718) 2016-Current Discussions about 718 Boxster Cayman Variants
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Chris Harris' Take on the 718

Old 06-23-2016, 12:46 PM
  #16  
spyderphile
Three Wheelin'
 
spyderphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Minnetonka, Minnesota
Posts: 1,357
Received 98 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GTS Daddy
After driving the 718 base and S on track back-to-back with the 981 GTS, the 718 S with perf. exhaust and PASM sport is sick!

..........
Yes I drank the Kool-aid, but this car is Dope! By the end of the year, you will find a 718 Cayman S in my driveway.
Nice review, GTS Daddy! Auto journalists are usually jaded types. However, they also get to drive all sorts of makes and models; and, compare. But, it's also refreshing to read an enthusiast's review. 718s must really be good since you are a changed man; and, willing to buy one!

Succeeding generation almost always pushes the boundaries. It's amazing how Porsche manages to find new limits in dynamics, and yet, maintain model hierarchy.

One question: Is auto rev-match present in both Sport and Sport Plus modes? I remember reading so.
Old 06-24-2016, 12:04 AM
  #17  
JCtx
Burning Brakes
 
JCtx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sp330
I'm of the strange type that doesn't even like the sound of roadgoing Ferrari V8's. It just sounds like two Honda inline 4's to me.
Hey, thought I was the only one. Ha ha. And that's exactly what a flat-crank V8 is: 2 inline-4s with a common crank. I'd also never buy a 4-banger turbo Porsche, period. I never had a doubt the new car would be quicker, but it'll never be for me. But I agree with somebody's comment that people not familiar with H6s might, and will eventually find them acceptable. The best sounding engine of any street car is Porsche H6 with PSE IMO. And I don't know why, but I think the 3.4 sounds the best, including the GT3. I have several friends with 991 GT3s and even at idle they sound a little rough IMO. But any 911 sounds better than a 4, even without PSE. But Porsche will continue selling Caymans and Boxsters... just not to me.
Old 06-24-2016, 06:22 PM
  #18  
Keadog
Rennlist Member
 
Keadog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,788
Received 1,010 Likes on 607 Posts
Default

I drove my BGTS today. One of my best purchases ever, IMO. I don't usually keep cars terribly long anymore, but I think I'll hang on to this one.
I'm sure the 718 is a fine car and I won't say I would never buy one. But I'm not rushing in to test drive one either.
Old 06-28-2016, 02:18 PM
  #19  
lunarx
Rennlist Member
 
lunarx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 553
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

+1 on GTS Daddys statements.
I did not get to do a track drive, but test drove a 718 & 718s.

The 718 is worse than any flat 6.
Typical jerky Turbo 4 feeling and rattle can sound.

However, the 718s was amazing.
Great low end torque and no detectable lag, very pleasant sound.
I did not get to try the top end, so waiting to hear more on that (or get a better test drive).

I am also considering a 718s Cayman.
However, I might wait for the GTS version.
Old 06-28-2016, 02:39 PM
  #20  
patdonahue
Pro
 
patdonahue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Henley Field, MS.
Posts: 641
Received 400 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

lunarx, please elaborate a bit on the 718S throttle response from a stop. You had mentioned no detectable lag but not knowing the conditions under which you drove it, was the "tip-in" throttle response from dead stop or low speed satisfying?
TIA, Pat D
Old 06-28-2016, 03:02 PM
  #21  
lunarx
Rennlist Member
 
lunarx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 553
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by patdonahue
lunarx, please elaborate a bit on the 718S throttle response from a stop. You had mentioned no detectable lag but not knowing the conditions under which you drove it, was the "tip-in" throttle response from dead stop or low speed satisfying?
TIA, Pat D
It was a typical cautious test drive.
The response off the line was fantastic.
Car just took off and pulled strong, no hesitation.
While rolling, at low revs, the car responded quickly, to the point of feeling more responsive than my 991s.
As you know, the 991s is about the top end, with not much happening below 3K.
I did not get to try the 718s top end.
Old 06-28-2016, 04:39 PM
  #22  
fhp911
Rennlist Member
 
fhp911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Metuchen NJ
Posts: 1,124
Received 106 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Chris Harris says,

The only problem being the mid-engined machine cannot accommodate three pairs of opposed cylinders, and must make do with just two.
But is it true that the 911 6-cyl engine won't ft into the 981/781 engine bay? People (including me) have put them into the 987 and 986
Old 06-28-2016, 04:54 PM
  #23  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,742
Received 4,706 Likes on 2,685 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fhp911
But is it true that the 911 6-cyl engine won't ft into the 981/781 engine bay? People (including me) have put them into the 987 and 986
Of course the NA Flat-6 from the 991.1 fits (witness Spyder and GT4), but the claim is that the turbo-6 (and its extra plumbing) from the 991.2 doesn't fit...
Old 06-28-2016, 08:46 PM
  #24  
CAlexio
Race Director
 
CAlexio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hypercar Invitational
Posts: 10,232
Received 1,963 Likes on 915 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
Of course the NA Flat-6 from the 991.1 fits (witness Spyder and GT4), but the claim is that the turbo-6 (and its extra plumbing) from the 991.2 doesn't fit...
Or marketing/product separation reasons don't let it fit.
Old 06-29-2016, 01:04 AM
  #25  
Noah Fect
Rennlist Member
 
Noah Fect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,243
Received 1,298 Likes on 886 Posts
Default

Another claim is that the 718's sheet metal and chassis have both been revamped extensively. So if a given engine "doesn't fit," it's because they didn't want it to fit.
Old 06-29-2016, 01:08 AM
  #26  
JCtx
Burning Brakes
 
JCtx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

It's absolutely obvious Porsche wanted to 'downgrade' the Cayman/Boxster to 4 cylinders to further differentiate the 911, but why the hell they don't admit it, is a mystery to me.
Old 06-29-2016, 01:49 AM
  #27  
erik_plus8
Burning Brakes
 
erik_plus8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Europe
Posts: 780
Received 57 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

They have admitted it. Although not officially. One of the project leader, Jan Roth, told a journo during some test driving earlier this year that marketing wanted engineering to do exactly this, and that a 4-cyl was the obvious way forward. Should be googleable.
Old 06-29-2016, 01:50 AM
  #28  
lunarx
Rennlist Member
 
lunarx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 553
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I think 981 was more downgraded with the 3.4 (it should have got the 3.8).
The 2.5T has a fighting chance.
I think you will see some fast 718s, when tunes get released.
Le Mans was won with a 4cyl.
Old 06-29-2016, 03:21 AM
  #29  
erik_plus8
Burning Brakes
 
erik_plus8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Europe
Posts: 780
Received 57 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Again - how "fast" it is has nothing to do with it. If you're only interested in straight line acceleration there are a ton of other cars to buy.

And the Le Mans win? Come on.... I don't care if NaziGermany was beaten with the 718 T/C flat 4 - I still wouldn't want it in my car with its clearly noticeable lag, dreadful sound and surpringly excessive vibrations...
Old 06-29-2016, 10:15 AM
  #30  
lunarx
Rennlist Member
 
lunarx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 553
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Those negative 718 statements are interesting, because the 718 has handling improvements and is lighter than 991.2.

The negative engine comments definetly apply to the 2.0T.
However, the 2.5T is great.

I like that 718 is doing its own thing now, to improve its game.
I'm curious if people who actually drive the 2.5T find, it a satisfying engine.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Chris Harris' Take on the 718



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:39 AM.