Notices
987 Forum Discussion about the Cayman/Boxster variants (2004-2012)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Dme overrev report?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2019, 02:24 PM
  #1  
brandobot
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
brandobot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: California
Posts: 382
Received 91 Likes on 65 Posts
Default Dme overrev report?

Looking for some advice on a car I’m considering buying. Can someone advise on this DME report?




Old 06-23-2019, 03:29 PM
  #2  
Marine Blue
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Marine Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 16,022
Received 801 Likes on 465 Posts
Default

With Range 5 Overrev I would pass, especially as it appears to have happened recently.
Old 06-23-2019, 03:32 PM
  #3  
LexVan
Banned
 
LexVan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Chicagoland Area
Posts: 26,142
Likes: 0
Received 5,388 Likes on 2,509 Posts
Default

And hammered again <5 hours ago. The range #1s are also almost at the max.
Old 06-23-2019, 07:12 PM
  #4  
vracer
Rennlist Member
 
vracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Marin County, CA
Posts: 462
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Yeah, but how do you "over rev" an 'automatic' transmission? I have never heard this explained. Going up, it should hit the rev limiter before over revving, and going down, it shouldn't change gears until it can shift without over revving. ???
Old 06-23-2019, 07:18 PM
  #5  
qwe
Intermediate
 
qwe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 48
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

The last overrevs have each happened about 40 hours apart showing a consistent pattern of hard driving.
If it was me, I would not walk. On second thought, I would run.
Old 06-23-2019, 07:30 PM
  #6  
professsorz
Racer
 
professsorz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 403
Received 46 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vracer
Yeah, but how do you "over rev" an 'automatic' transmission? I have never heard this explained. Going up, it should hit the rev limiter before over revving, and going down, it shouldn't change gears until it can shift without over revving. ???
It's a manual Cayman - no PDK
Old 06-23-2019, 07:53 PM
  #7  
brandobot
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
brandobot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: California
Posts: 382
Received 91 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Thanks for all of your feedback. The car has had track time.

This is the seller’s response..

DMEs aren't very useful except where an engine starts misbehaving after an overrev event. Then they point to something having bent, broken, or stretched, etc. If the car runs fine after the event, then the parts didn't bend, break or stretch and the DME is pretty much irrelevant. The number on the left in each range is the number of ignition events. To translate that into seconds, divide by 7000 and you will overestimate the time by a little. This will give you the total time the engine operated in that range. The number on the right is the engine hours when the last event occurred. That may have been a short event, and all of the events much longer ago--there is no way of knowing. You can get a sense for street/track balance by dividing the miles by the hours to give you an average speed. Here, that will tell you that the car was predominantly driven on the street. Sorry for the long explanation, but some people think that DMEs have almost mystical predictive powers, but they don't--unless an engine has failed right after an event.”
Old 06-23-2019, 08:40 PM
  #8  
professsorz
Racer
 
professsorz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 403
Received 46 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

I've lost track of Porsche's requirements for CPO but I believe in the past (and possibly today) they'll refuse to CPO a car with any level 4 overrevs. So, logical or not, Porsche considers it a sufficiently "bad thing" to not believe the return on investment will be there, on average, with a car that exhibits that condition.
Old 06-23-2019, 08:56 PM
  #9  
schell
Racer
 
schell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 71 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Really scary report.
Old 06-23-2019, 09:19 PM
  #10  
Tom R.
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Tom R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mile High
Posts: 10,122
Received 97 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

The 987.1 used forged rod bolts. Cheap forged rod bolts. A friend with a heavily tracked 987.1 was having routine work done when the wrench heard something amiss. About $25,000 later the motor is ready for the track. That is reality. Reality sucks, and is not what the seller is saying. Most of the owners of cars I see on the track take better care of their car than the general population (and general Porsche population). The people who know how to drive their car on the track don't hit zone 5 on a regular basis. Unless the car is being sold at a significant discount which will give you a chance to weigh the pros and cons, you may end up paying less in the long run if you pay the outrageous asking price the dealer in IL wants for the lightly optioned black 987.2 Cayman S manual with 9k miles. At least you wont need a motor, and it has a CPO.

I would pass on the one you posted.
Old 06-23-2019, 09:21 PM
  #11  
brandobot
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
brandobot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: California
Posts: 382
Received 91 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Thanks all. Will pass on this car.
Old 06-23-2019, 10:34 PM
  #12  
Marine Blue
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Marine Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 16,022
Received 801 Likes on 465 Posts
Default

A really bad DME report should be treated the same as a salvage title IMHO. If the car is offered at a discount to cover the potential cost of an engine rebuild then it can be an acceptable purchase. Assuming $18k for a rebuild you should discount half or more off the price and assume you’re on the hook for the remaining in the coming year or two. The unfortunate part of this is that the DME report will follow the car and it may make it more difficult to sell at a later date unless the engine rebuild is fully documented in the listing.
Old 06-24-2019, 07:18 AM
  #13  
ToasterThief
Rennlist Member
 
ToasterThief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Philly->Denver
Posts: 823
Received 176 Likes on 100 Posts
Default

My understanding is that overrevs in an "unsafe range" can be ok if >300 hours has passed since that time. This one is nowhere near that. Pass.
Old 06-24-2019, 04:21 PM
  #14  
TMc993
Rennlist Member
 
TMc993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Dahlonega, Georgia
Posts: 3,552
Received 534 Likes on 337 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by brandobot
...You can get a sense for street/track balance by dividing the miles by the hours to give you an average speed. Here, that will tell you that the car was predominantly driven on the street...”
No it doesn't. If you drove a car 150 MPH for 20 hours (3000 miles) and 1 MPH for 20 hours (20 miles), your average speed ((3000+20)/40) would be 75.5 MPH which is indicative of nothing. Dude needs to retake STAT 101 and learn the limitations of using a simple mean as a descriptive statistic.
Old 06-24-2019, 07:55 PM
  #15  
professsorz
Racer
 
professsorz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 403
Received 46 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TMc993
No it doesn't. If you drove a car 150 MPH for 20 hours (3000 miles) and 1 MPH for 20 hours (20 miles), your average speed ((3000+20)/40) would be 75.5 MPH which is indicative of nothing. Dude needs to retake STAT 101 and learn the limitations of using a simple mean as a descriptive statistic.
"REtake?" Ha! You mean "take". Statistics, even of the 101 variety, isn't required hardly nowhere nohow any more, sad to say.



Quick Reply: Dme overrev report?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:34 AM.