Notices
Spyder/Cayman R Discussions about the 987 Spyder/Cayman R (2011-2012)

The 987.2 Spyder Recipe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-24-2018, 07:47 PM
  #1  
Marine Blue
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Marine Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 16,022
Received 801 Likes on 465 Posts
Default The 987.2 Spyder Recipe

Earlier today I was reading an article about the Euro 964 RS which is highly coveted in the air cooled world with values starting to skyrocket. Here’s a driver quality example with some modifications that recently sold on BAT: https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1994-porsche-911-rs/.

Many Porsche enthusiasts consider the 964 RS one of the best all around air cooled 911 driving experiences. What stood out to me about the RS is the formula Porsche used to reduce its weight 300 lbs and achieve the desireable driving experience. Here’s a list of what they did:
  • No rear seats
  • Removed door pockets
  • No Power Windows or mirrors
  • Pull strap door handles
  • Plastic windows
  • Aluminum Hood
  • Lightweight rear bumper
  • Lightweight flywheel
  • Stiffer lowered suspension
  • Lightweight seats
  • Lightweight magnesium wheels
  • Added 10 Hp
  • No A/C or Radio
  • Mechanical steering (remove hydraulic unit)
What stood out for me are how similar the 987.2 Spyders diet follows this recipe:
  • Aluminum doors
  • Aluminum hood
  • no door pockets
  • Lightweight top
  • Lightweight seats
  • Stiffer lowered suspension
  • Limited Slip
  • Pull strap to open doors
  • Eliminated rear motorized wing in favor of lighter stationary wing
  • Lightweigh front fog light
  • Lightweight wheels
  • Added 10 Hp
  • AC / Radio Delete option
Not everyone will understand these cars and many may not want or feel these changes when driving the car but for those of us who are after an undiluted driving experience I firmly believe the 987.2 Spyder offers something very special that is rarely found in cars, especially modern cars. There are some nay sayers that feel a Boxster will never be as good as a 911 and my comparison is bunk but I don’t believe these people have experienced the Spyder where it really shines. Around town, on the highway and on normal two lane roads the Spyder won’t feel special, it will only look special. But when your pushing the car hard through miles of twisty backroads and canyon roads, when the car communicates what each tire is doing and what surface your on, when the chassis tells you the rear or front is coming loose and you know which tire is losing traction and which has grip, when the controls respond exactly the way you expect you come away with an experience that is not only exhilarating but also stress relieving. All of this with complete reliability and nice materials of construction.

At current prices it is an undiscovered bargain of the century.
Old 12-24-2018, 08:14 PM
  #2  
daylorb
Rennlist Member
 
daylorb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 889
Received 79 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Interesting - and the 964 RS only put out 265 bhp iwith a 3.6, weighed around 2700lbs. I've always said the Boxsters of today are the Carrera's of old.
Old 12-24-2018, 09:25 PM
  #3  
Zeus993
Rennlist Member
 
Zeus993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 6,166
Received 1,242 Likes on 573 Posts
Default

Afshin - I share your sentiments here on the Spyder. I wonder if anyone criticized the 964 RS for its lack of luxury features, as some do here with both generations of Spyders?

With the RS at 2700 #, the Gen-1 Spyder at 2811 is not the far off. According to Suncoast Porsche, the regular seat is in excess of 55 #, with the LWBS in around 39 #, a PCM around 7. It probably wouldn't take too much to get the overall 987.2 Spyder down to 2700# - a "Spyder RS". Thrown another $9250 at it for a GT2 RS CF hood, complete with it's Porsche Crest Decal (https://www.suncoastparts.com/product/GT2RSHOOD.html) and save ???)

Spyder RS plan
1. Ditch the PCM (7 #)
2. Ditch the AC (45#)
3. Ditch the passenger seat (39 - 55#)
4. Leave the top in the Garage (10# ?)
5. Replace the windows with plastic ones (20# ?)
6. Replace the hood with CF (40# ?)
7. Ultra LW wheels?
8. PCCBs?
9. Spyder RS decal on the back? (# ?)

Anything else?
Old 12-24-2018, 09:37 PM
  #4  
Marine Blue
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Marine Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 16,022
Received 801 Likes on 465 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zeus993
Afshin - I share your sentiments here on the Spyder. I wonder if anyone criticized the 964 RS for its lack of luxury features, as some do here with both generations of Spyders?

With the RS at 2700 #, the Gen-1 Spyder at 2811 is not the far off. According to Suncoast Porsche, the regular seat is in excess of 55 #, with the LWBS in around 39 #, a PCM around 7. It probably wouldn't take too much to get the overall 987.2 Spyder down to 2700# - a "Spyder RS". Thrown another $9250 at it for a GT2 RS CF hood, complete with it's Porsche Crest Decal (https://www.suncoastparts.com/product/GT2RSHOOD.html) and save ???)

Spyder RS plan
1. Ditch the PCM (7 #)
2. Ditch the AC (45#)
3. Ditch the passenger seat (39 - 55#)
4. Leave the top in the Garage (10# ?)
5. Replace the windows with plastic ones (20# ?)
6. Replace the hood with CF (40# ?)
7. Ultra LW wheels?
8. PCCBs?
9. Spyder RS decal on the back? (# ?)

Anything else?
Joel you need to follow through on this, shedding another 100 lbs should make the Spyder as sharp as a needle. Maybe the only other change would be the addition of sport headers which would also shed more weight and add some volume to the exhaust.
Old 12-24-2018, 09:54 PM
  #5  
JSF101
Burning Brakes
 
JSF101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 986
Received 169 Likes on 97 Posts
Default

yes, do it!
my old Spyder (Speed Yellow one) was designed to be a lightweight driver's car, no radio. Was going to delete air conditioning but figured that would be suicide in Texas. If the wife hadn't had knee replacement, I'd still have it but she just had too much trouble getting in and out of buckets, plus kept asking, "now tell me why we didn't get a radio in this car!"

Originally Posted by Marine Blue


Joel you need to follow through on this.
Old 12-25-2018, 10:26 AM
  #6  
f4 plt
Rennlist Member

 
f4 plt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,108
Received 140 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Get rid of the stock battery. I went with a lighter AGM battery. Rational 1) it is lighter and 2) look where PORSCHE mounted the battery , very high on the car. It is not only reducing overall weight but insuring the weigh there is low on the car. PCCB's and Sport Buckets will certainly reduce weight AND the sport buckets are great seats, Yes Steve, its not always easy for me to get in but once there GREAT seats. PCCBs not only provide better braking but they reduce not only total weight but unsprung weight. As for wheels the standard 987 Spyder wheel is one of the lightest PORSCHE makes. Tires are another area where weight can be reduced. The Bridgestone R71's are great tires but Bridgestone's in general are a heavier tire. Mich. Cups will save a pound or two of unsprung weight at each corner over the Bridgestone's and there are other tire choices. While the stock exhaust on the 987 Spyder is fairly efficient it is heavy ( and PORSCHE sport exhaust even a few lbs more) a lighter exhaust say one made of Titanium would save pounds and also reduce rear end weight and thus slightly improve balance. That said be careful you don't get one that produces drone at cruising speeds, remember wife comfort. Bottom line its a fine mix between reducing weight and keeping the car enjoyable to drive for both you and the wife
Old 12-25-2018, 11:35 AM
  #7  
f4 plt
Rennlist Member

 
f4 plt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,108
Received 140 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Another point I would make is if you are focused on optimizing the 987 Spyder for all it can be and still keep it steerable you might look at some suspension upgrades. I have switched out the stock shocks for Bilstein coil overs thus allowing some adjustment and corner balancing. The next issue is alignment. The vehicle as it comes has lots of adjustment for the rear camber but is limited in the front to slightly less than one degree negative. By replacing the lower control arms with those from the GT 3 you can easily attain more negative camber at the front and a slightly wider track. I'm currently at 1.5 negative on the front and 2 negative on the rear. The car tracks great, turns in very sharply and yet does not adversely effect tire wear. In fact I find with this setup it tracks much better on the highway in stiff crosswinds
Old 12-25-2018, 12:38 PM
  #8  
Marine Blue
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Marine Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 16,022
Received 801 Likes on 465 Posts
Default

Agreed on the lighter battery and tires, I have done both and it is noticeable on this car. They’re also very easy and relatively reasonably priced to implement.

I’m about to embark on changes to the alignment to dial out the understeer and also sharpen the steering response beyond it’s current stock settings. My tech noted that my limitation will be the camber but I’m not really after any drastic changes. A small amount is all I’m after to fine tune the car and dial out the safety that Porsche implemented.

Another comment on weight, my tech weighed out the xenon headlights on the 987 and mentioned that each one weights 8lbs EACH more than the standard halogen lights. That doesn’t even include the additional washer motor and reservoir!

Looking back I’m still surprised that Porsche went as far as they did with the 987 diet, it’s really not common when you look back in Porsche street production car history.
Old 12-25-2018, 12:46 PM
  #9  
djm68
Racer
 
djm68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 300
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zeus993
Afshin - I share your sentiments here on the Spyder. I wonder if anyone criticized the 964 RS for its lack of luxury features, as some do here with both generations of Spyders?

With the RS at 2700 #, the Gen-1 Spyder at 2811 is not the far off. According to Suncoast Porsche, the regular seat is in excess of 55 #, with the LWBS in around 39 #, a PCM around 7. It probably wouldn't take too much to get the overall 987.2 Spyder down to 2700# - a "Spyder RS". Thrown another $9250 at it for a GT2 RS CF hood, complete with it's Porsche Crest Decal (https://www.suncoastparts.com/product/GT2RSHOOD.html) and save ???)

Spyder RS plan
1. Ditch the PCM (7 #)
2. Ditch the AC (45#)
3. Ditch the passenger seat (39 - 55#)
4. Leave the top in the Garage (10# ?)
5. Replace the windows with plastic ones (20# ?)
6. Replace the hood with CF (40# ?)
7. Ultra LW wheels?
8. PCCBs?
9. Spyder RS decal on the back? (# ?)

Anything else?
I have a 2012 Cayman R, factory AC and radio delete. Factory LWB seats. My car is PDK equipped, which adds weight, of course; steel brakes, PSE exhaust, no other options. I had the dealership install the sport Chrono software as this allowed me to not have PCM/stereo nor the silly dash wart.

I am on a mission to get it even lighter.

Weight Savings:
Lithium battery, saved #32
Strip rear hatch area, saved #27
Carpet over engine cover, saved #10

Added weight:
2x Schroth 6 points, plus harness bar
BGB diff cooler for PDK
LN Engineering 2.5 quart deep sump oil pan

I've replaced OEM suspension with coilovers, Tarrett bits throughout, assuming that did not significantly impact weight one way or another.
I am at 2942, 1/2 tanks of gas. I doubt the factory claimed weights for the Spyder, just as I do for the R.

Carbon hood is not ligher than the aluminum, or just marginally so.
Dumping the factory steering wheel might save 10 lbs due to eliminating the airbag.
Lightening the bumper/impact supports under the bumper covers is supposed to be a good source of weight reduction.
Carbon hatch and poly window saves about #30.

Getting down to 2700# would be quite a task, but would be amazing if possible.

Cheers,
​​​​​​​DJM
Old 12-25-2018, 02:57 PM
  #10  
Suicide Jockey
Rennlist Member
 
Suicide Jockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 112 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Marine Blue
At current prices it is an undiscovered bargain of the century.
+1 !!

Obviously, when embarking on a weight savings mission, not all mods yield the same bang for the buck. To reinforce the comments of others above with respect to a lightweight battery, the May issue of C&D looked at the Weissach Package on the GT2RS, which, when added, depletes your wallet by $31,000 and lightens your car by only 40 lbs. equating to a cost-per-pound saved of $775 -- pretty hefty! The article then looked as some common weight savings measures the owners of "average" 911's could adopt to achieve much greater weight savings at a significantly reduced cost, such as LWBs, CCBs, battery, CF hood, lexan window, lightweight wheels, and exhaust -- all items you guys are discussing here. Here's the breakdown of cost-per-pound-saved:

LWBs = $163
CCBs = $185
Battery = $32
CF hood = $916
Lexan window = $54
Lightweight wheels = $323

As noted by others above, a battery is tough to beat for best bang-for-the-buck achieving the greatest weight loss for the least amount of money.











Old 12-26-2018, 12:19 PM
  #11  
A432
Rennlist Member
 
A432's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,291
Received 349 Likes on 204 Posts
Default

….

Last edited by A432; 12-26-2018 at 01:29 PM.
Old 12-26-2018, 12:45 PM
  #12  
andy7777
Rennlist Member
 
andy7777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 887
Received 205 Likes on 138 Posts
Default

If someone paid me $900 a pound I'd lose 15 in a jiffy!
Old 12-26-2018, 08:42 PM
  #13  
brur
Advanced
 
brur's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 67
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I know many a wife who wouldn't
Old 12-26-2018, 09:45 PM
  #14  
Zeus993
Rennlist Member
 
Zeus993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 6,166
Received 1,242 Likes on 573 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Suicide Jockey;15520784]+1 !!

Obviously, when embarking on a weight savings mission, not all mods yield the same bang for the buck. To reinforce the comments of others above with respect to a lightweight battery, the May issue of C&D looked at the Weissach Package on the GT2RS, which, when added, depletes your wallet by $31,000 and lightens your car by only 40 lbs. equating to a cost-per-pound saved of $775 -- pretty hefty! The article then looked as some common weight savings measures the owners of "average" 911's could adopt to achieve much greater weight savings at a significantly reduced cost, such as LWBs, CCBs, battery, CF hood, lexan window, lightweight wheels, and exhaust -- all items you guys are discussing here. Here's the breakdown of cost-per-pound-saved:

LWBs = $163
CCBs = $185
Battery = $32
CF hood = $916
Lexan window = $54
Lightweight wheels = $323

As noted by others above, a battery is tough to beat for best bang-for-the-buck achieving the greatest weight loss for the least amount of money.













Good stuff Nick.

Afshin - what did you put in for a LW battery?

JP
Old 12-26-2018, 10:29 PM
  #15  
FactoryMatt
Rennlist Member
 
FactoryMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 164
Received 16 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

catless headers
forged 18s
essex radical brakes
hyperco/swift springs


Quick Reply: The 987.2 Spyder Recipe



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:28 AM.