Notices
987 Forum Discussion about the Cayman/Boxster variants (2004-2012)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Backpressure from muffler delete?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-28-2018, 02:01 PM
  #1  
gtbrandon
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
gtbrandon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Virginia
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Backpressure from muffler delete?

So I want to make my car sound a little throatier/deeper, and think a muffler delete is a good place to start. Yes, yes I can get a full exhaust system that will have less drone and be better but that's also $1,000 vs $100. I can always install the aftermarket exhaust if I don't like the results of the muffler delete. My question is, is there any expereince with a loss of backpressure due to removing the mufflers, and if so, has this caused any performance losses. It has been hard to find anyone who has done this on their Cayman/Boxster so I thought I'd post this up and find out.

Side note: If anyone is selling their aftermarket exhaust or headers, let me know as I'm looking for a good deal on a used set.
Old 02-28-2018, 02:04 PM
  #2  
PorscheAddict
Rennlist Member
 
PorscheAddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,255
Received 122 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

If you just want a little louder or throatier a muffler delete will drive you nuts - it will be very very loud. It would also be technically difficult since you would have to craft curved pipe to fit where the muffler was. Loss of backpressure will cause little to no hp increase/decrease, but bad flow (i.e., from a leak rather than just being free flowing) will decrease power.

If you have a 981 I'm selling a Fabspeed Maxflo you may be interested in: https://rennlist.com/forums/parts-ma...for-981-a.html.
Old 02-28-2018, 02:42 PM
  #3  
jscott82
Rennlist Member
 
jscott82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,076
Received 363 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

There is no such thing as "good" back-pressure... Any resistance to flow is bad...

The problem, is harmonics. OEM does a great job of modeling pipe lengths, chamber size, pipe diameter to achieve good flow. Simply pulling the muffler out and replacing with a piece of pipe, probably not going to do too much either way.

I have a Tubi system that was on my 987.1 when I got it. If you are interested.
Old 02-28-2018, 07:35 PM
  #4  
gtbrandon
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
gtbrandon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Virginia
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PorscheAddict
If you just want a little louder or throatier a muffler delete will drive you nuts - it will be very very loud. It would also be technically difficult since you would have to craft curved pipe to fit where the muffler was. Loss of backpressure will cause little to no hp increase/decrease, but bad flow (i.e., from a leak rather than just being free flowing) will decrease power.

If you have a 981 I'm selling a Fabspeed Maxflo you may be interested in: https://rennlist.com/forums/parts-ma...for-981-a.html.
Did you run a muffler delete on your car, if so how did you deal with the intermediate pipe between the two mufflers? Also I'm assuming there would be no leaks from a clean weld, so I'm not seeing the issue?

Side note: Can you run a 981 exhaust on a 987.1?
Old 04-19-2018, 12:44 AM
  #5  
gtbrandon
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
gtbrandon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Virginia
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So I decided to go to a local muffler shop and see how much damage I could do with $100. I got rid of the rear mufflers (and secondary cats inside them) and replaced with a good ol' straight pipe. In my opinion it sounds great and could not be happier. Drone isn't terrible and for this price compared to a new or even used exhaust system, I think I came out on top. We will see in the coming days how this is on the highway but around town the sound is just right for me, and when I get on it...Oh man does it make me smile. Also an added benefit of weight reduction from those damn mufflers, must weight 20lbs each with the cats inside. Here's a video of around town and a few pulls, let me know what you think compared to your exhaust set ups.


Old 04-19-2018, 09:41 AM
  #6  
PorscheAddict
Rennlist Member
 
PorscheAddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,255
Received 122 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

Sounds pretty good for the price, but I suspect it will be pretty uncomfortable on the highway. My 981 with race headers and PSE in open is perfect to my ears, but MUCH more expensive.
Old 04-19-2018, 10:39 PM
  #7  
billwot
Instructor
 
billwot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 210
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jscott82
There is no such thing as "good" back-pressure... Any resistance to flow is bad...

The problem, is harmonics. OEM does a great job of modeling pipe lengths, chamber size, pipe diameter to achieve good flow. Simply pulling the muffler out and replacing with a piece of pipe, probably not going to do too much either way.

I have a Tubi system that was on my 987.1 when I got it. If you are interested.


Back pressure is an increase in pumping losses, and restricts the volume of the subsequent intake charge of air/fuel.

"Any resistance to flow is bad"
Old 04-20-2018, 07:57 AM
  #8  
GregWormald
Racer
 
GregWormald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: South Australia
Posts: 390
Received 48 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by billwot


Back pressure is an increase in pumping losses, and restricts the volume of the subsequent intake charge of air/fuel.

"Any resistance to flow is bad"
I think that maybe is too simple. I'm not an expert but the shop that worked on my motorcycle, who builds specialty racing exhausts as well a does custom work on road bikes, said that (for my bike) tuning and increasing the back pressure at the crossover tube between the cylinders would increase low end torque. Decreasing would increase high-rev power but I'd lose drivability at lower revs.
Old 04-20-2018, 10:38 AM
  #9  
billwot
Instructor
 
billwot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 210
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregWormald
I think that maybe is too simple. I'm not an expert but the shop that worked on my motorcycle, who builds specialty racing exhausts as well a does custom work on road bikes, said that (for my bike) tuning and increasing the back pressure at the crossover tube between the cylinders would increase low end torque. Decreasing would increase high-rev power but I'd lose drivability at lower revs.
No, it really is not "too simple". But people often confuse "back pressure" with other exhaust variables like harmonics and tuning.

1) Back pressure is a parasitic pumping loss. It is an increased load on the piston which must be overcome during the exhaust upstroke.

2) Back pressure reduces the amount of spent exhaust gas that is cleared, so residual gasses remain in the combustion, and interfere with the inflow of a fresh air/fuel charge.

There is an exception to the "back pressure is bad" rule, however. Back pressure is important for 2 cycle engines. Because of the design and operation of 2 cycles, both the exhaust and intake ports are open simultaneously. Back pressure actually helps contain the fresh A/F charge, and prevents if simply flowing back out the open exhaust port. So exhaust tuning, harnessing the natural harmonics, is actually ver important for maximizing 2 cycle performance. And exhaust tuning that creates a venturi effect to actually reduce back pressure in an adjacent runner also increase performance in a 4 stroke engine, again, by actually reducing back pressure

Last edited by billwot; 04-23-2018 at 08:01 PM.
Old 04-23-2018, 07:37 PM
  #10  
medtech
Drifting
 
medtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cali
Posts: 2,727
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Sounds pretty good to me!
Old 04-23-2018, 10:42 PM
  #11  
Alan C.
Rennlist Member
 
Alan C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9,407
Received 988 Likes on 511 Posts
Default

What did the shop use for the tubing? I've seen shops use Aluminzed Carbon Steel for tubing on cars with 304SS. Not a good option.
Old 04-24-2018, 12:17 AM
  #12  
digitalrurouni
Pro
 
digitalrurouni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I always thought the GT4 and Spyder were loud enough already. Frankly I even think they sound better than the GT3 motor. It's like when people say the 458 Speciale sounds better than the 458 I have to disagree. Something about those really high revs where the sound just goes all janky and harsh instead of sounding pleasant. Anyway I am probably in the minority but my question would be with the valves open these cars are freaking loud - with muffler bypasses wouldn't tracks black flag you if you cause of the decibels?
Old 06-07-2018, 12:54 PM
  #13  
yadier713
1st Gear
 
yadier713's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you have pics of the end result.?



Quick Reply: Backpressure from muffler delete?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:22 PM.