Notices
987 Forum Discussion about the Cayman/Boxster variants (2004-2012)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

986 boxster S vs 987 vs 996

Old 10-15-2017, 03:38 AM
  #1  
s85b50
Racer
Thread Starter
 
s85b50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: global
Posts: 405
Received 46 Likes on 42 Posts
Default 986 boxster S vs 987 vs 996

Hello guys, I am new to the forum and porsche(besides the SUV which doesn't count) and thought it'd be great to get some insights from actual owners.

I am currently thinking of buying either 986 boxster S, 987 Cayman or 996 C2 for occasional back roads and track use
as they are similarly priced in my region. The only difference is that 987 comes with factory CPO warranty.

I threw in boxster among the crew because
1. I noticed it actually is lighter than any other porsche (besides special edition); and
2. I like to feel that breeze through my hair sometimes.
I do recognize that for all out driving, Cayman is the more sensible choice for its rigidity, but 996 has the most kW.

I've test drove all of them, but can't decide as each has its own merits so I decided to base my decision on the following factors:
1. How do these compare maintenance wise?
2. What are the costs for IMS reinforcement for each vehicle? Does this void warranty?
3. What are the most common problems of each vehicle?
Old 10-15-2017, 12:18 PM
  #2  
terbiumactivated
Banned
 
terbiumactivated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Atlanta Ga
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Unsure of the cost but if I was going to buy a M96 powered car I'd factor in a new rear seal and IMS upgrade into my equation.
Old 10-15-2017, 01:33 PM
  #3  
R_Rated
Banned
 
R_Rated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Where aspirations are natural
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

IMS only affected 4-5% of cars. Roll the dice or pay 1500usd to fix it.

If you're serious about tracking get the cayman.

If you want the most nimble top town experience get the Boxster.

If you want the icon or any sense of practicality for long weekends get the 911.

All great choices and all very different.
Old 10-15-2017, 03:26 PM
  #4  
Macster
Race Director
 
Macster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Centerton, AR
Posts: 19,034
Likes: 0
Received 246 Likes on 217 Posts
Default

Good replies.

Let me add my two cents...

The Boxster is a pretty rigid car. If you really want the air through the hair experience then get the Boxster and enjoy the superb road manners and handling even when pushing the car.

You need to be sure you want the top down experience. The top will at some point leak or the hardware wear out.

After owning a Boxster for a number of years and putting over 315K miles on it (almost all with the top up I might add) and a 996 (Turbo) since June 2009 (and putting over 140K miles on it) maintenance wise the cars are very similar at least regarding scheduled maintenance. Oil/filter, air filter, brake fluid (and for manuals clutch fluid), transmission fluid services are the "same", that is occur at the same number of miles or after the same amount of time.

'course, the same service for my Turbo costs more than for my Boxster. The difference between a 986/987 vs. a 996 (NA car) would be I would guess be in favor of the 986/987 but not by much and probably not by enough to be a factor.

Feel compelled to say this: If the few dollars difference in servicing is a big concern then neither car is probably for you.

This is not intended as some kind of slam towards you. These cars are quite expensive to buy when new. Used while they cost less the cost to service/maintain them the way they should be serviced/maintained doesn't get any less expensive. While one doesn't need Bill Gates money these are not cars to buy and expected to be enjoyed and operated on a tight or limited budget.

Certainly if one is able to he can do some things and save some money, at least labor costs.

Can't help you regarding the iMS question regarding costs.

For warranty questions you'll have to speak to the company that offers the warranty to find out what the presence of an aftermarket IMSB solution/fix does to the warranty. More than speak with the company, get the agreement's fine print and read it 3 times. It is what is in the fine print the company will do not what someone tells you over the phone. 'course if you hear over the phone the IMSB voids the warranty you can save yourself the trouble of reading the fine print.

Off hand I'd have to say the presence of an IMSB upgrade brings into question the warranty at least on the engine.

If the transmission dies that's probably a claim the warranthy company would honor.

But if the engine dies the warranty company could use the presence of a non-factory engine modification to deny the claim.

These cars are just well, cars, and are prone to the problems all cars are prone to. Ignoring wear items, though with enough miles all items are wear items, there is the water pump, fuel pump. Ignition switches have been known to wear out. And over a large enough sample of vehicles, any and all of the engine subsystems can act up. I'm talking about the starter, alternator, MAF, E-Gas (pedal), throttle body. O2 sensors are wear items but when they'll wear out depends.

Inside the various brake/clutch light and interlock/safety switches can and do wear out. Both window regulators in my Boxster wore out and were replaced along with other interior door hardware, like door lock controller, door latch switches and both door membranes. (More on this below.)

A real common problem and one not generally found with other cars is the AOS. My Boxster has been through 3 of these. The Turbo engine doesn't have the problematic AOS but the Cayman and 996 do have the problematic AOS.

When the AOS goes bad you really get little warning but you do get a some kind of clear indication -- billowing clouds of oil smoke from the exhaust -- that the AOS is bad.

At this point you can't continue to use the car, even run the engine, in this case. The smoke just lets you know the AOS is bad and it is time to call the auto club to send a flat bed truck to pick up the car and haul it to the shop for AOS replacement.

Another problem area that is in some ways unique to these cars is the body water drains. For whichever car you buy you need to inspect these before you buy to confirm they are free of trash (mainly plant litter) build up and the cabin has *not* experienced any water intrusion and after you buy keep these drains free of trash build up.

Also, you need to check the door bottoms, the carpets, after a wash or rain for any signs of moisture. The doors have a dry and wet side and the two sides are separated by a membrane. Over time this membrane can fail and let water from the wet side over into the dry side. If this happens window/door lock electrical gremlins can and will occur and if the water in the door not dealt with promptly cause other problems. There is the risk the water can leak into the cabin and if this happens this can ruin the car's security module which is on the cabin floor under the driver's seat.

The radiator ducts will collect trash. With the radiator fans running these cars just hoover up anything that gets near the radiator duct openings and this gets caught at the condensor or between the condensor and the radiator. Periodically this trash needs to be removed.

The Boxster has been a reliable car over the years. Things have worn out but as it has covered a lot of miles this is to be expected.

The basic engine, drivetrain, including the clutch (believe it or not), are still just fine. The CV boots tore and I had the CV bearings cleaned/repacked and these are fine now. So the drivetrain is original albeit the CV bearings received some attention.

So in buying a good example, and with proper serivicing, and care and with some empathy for the car and engine and with some luck I would expect you would experience much the same with a Boxster, a Cayman or a 996.

It comes down to which car do you want.
The following users liked this post:
zagamuffin (11-14-2020)
Old 10-16-2017, 03:19 AM
  #5  
DFW01TT
Burning Brakes
 
DFW01TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,058
Received 522 Likes on 311 Posts
Default

How important is the top down experience?
If you get a 986 you'll need to do the "Boxster chop" unless a previous owner was kind enough to convert to glass.
A high mileage car will likely not be an IMS problem. Watch out for the low mileage "driven to church on Sunday" cars.

Macster provides good guidance for you.
Old 10-16-2017, 07:23 AM
  #6  
s85b50
Racer
Thread Starter
 
s85b50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: global
Posts: 405
Received 46 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Thank you all for the comprehensive replies.

As it will be strictly weekend fun toy, I do value top down experience, but not at the expense of driving joy.
The Cayman I am eyeing has PDK (2011) and all recent goodies
but the other two are MT and one of the latest productions of respective era.

Originally Posted by Macster
Feel compelled to say this: If the few dollars difference in servicing is a big concern then neither car is probably for you.
Regular maintenance cost isn't an issue. I am just hoping for a car that doesn't eat $$ like E60 M5 does.
I did factor in IMS bearing and all the wear items - discs, pads, pulleys, pumps etc-
but the cars I am looking for is around 10-40k miles which gets me concerned on DFW01TT's comment.
What can go wrong other than clogging/sludge for these "driven to church" cars?

Also, I've noticed that some 996s have "sport package" with LSD advertised.
Is this clutch pack LSD or Torsen from the factory?
Old 10-21-2017, 04:12 AM
  #7  
Spokayman
Rennlist Member
 
Spokayman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 1,384
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

The Cayman would be (and is) my first choice for track and spirited road driving with the 996 being in second place.
However if I was limited to only one Porsche it would have to be a convertible as I love the top down open air experience that only a cab provides.
I personally changed from a 996 cab to a 987.2 Boxster because I enjoy the mid engine car’s handling better. The 996 was a better grand tourer and more comfortable to take on extended trips and I do miss that.

So to my way of thinking you should decide between cab or coupe first and then decide 986, 996, or 987.
Old 10-25-2017, 05:51 PM
  #8  
fhp911
Rennlist Member
 
fhp911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Metuchen NJ
Posts: 1,124
Received 106 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

We all owe Macster a tip of the hat for his thorough and excellent explanation.
Old 10-25-2017, 05:58 PM
  #9  
R_Rated
Banned
 
R_Rated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Where aspirations are natural
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Other considerations - The Boxsters have hard tops you can add and look awesome.
Old 10-25-2017, 06:10 PM
  #10  
daylorb
Rennlist Member
 
daylorb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 888
Received 79 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

I would think if you are looking at an '11 Cayman, you could probably find a 987 Boxster S for a similar price? I believe 06 and later had the IMS dealt with.

I'd bet you could find an 07 or 08, possibly even an RS60 which would be incredible for roughly the same price as a non-S 2011 PDK?

I haven't look much, but seems like the difference in years would be an equalizer on price...

But I've been wrong before!
Old 11-30-2017, 07:10 AM
  #11  
Opposer
Instructor
 
Opposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 113
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

i also choose between 986 s and cayman 987 2.7.

selling my frs right now
Old 11-30-2017, 08:01 PM
  #12  
FlamsteadHill
Instructor
 
FlamsteadHill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: SE VT
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by daylorb
I believe 06 and later had the IMS dealt with.
Not.

The '06+ seems to be the least susceptible (1% vs 5% or thereabouts IIRC), but it is still a potential issue.

And the bugger is that the upgrade is not really feasible - you have to split the engine to replace the IMS bearing or do an upgrade to it, as opposed to the earlier engines where you "only" have to separate the trans from the engine...
Old 12-02-2017, 12:28 PM
  #13  
Quadcammer
Race Director
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 15,627
Received 1,368 Likes on 792 Posts
Default

gents, if you are tracking, IMS is far from your only concern. Get a 9A1 motor if you can afford it. Tracking an M96/m97 is just not a good idea.
Old 12-04-2017, 01:08 PM
  #14  
Charlie C
Porsche Nut
Rennlist Member
 
Charlie C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 2,579
Received 139 Likes on 69 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daylorb
I would think if you are looking at an '11 Cayman, you could probably find a 987 Boxster S for a similar price? I believe 06 and later had the IMS dealt with.

I'd bet you could find an 07 or 08, possibly even an RS60 which would be incredible for roughly the same price as a non-S 2011 PDK?

I haven't look much, but seems like the difference in years would be an equalizer on price...

But I've been wrong before!
Startng in ‘09, 987.2 have no IMS in the new engines. Nor do the 997.2.
Old 12-05-2017, 12:08 AM
  #15  
Sterling Doc
Rennlist Member
 
Sterling Doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sterling, IL
Posts: 1,459
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Quadcammer
gents, if you are tracking, IMS is far from your only concern. Get a 9A1 motor if you can afford it. Tracking an M96/m97 is just not a good idea.
^This. If you are going to the track, the 9A1 is a much better unit. A 2.9 Cayman has the brakes from the Boxster S, and is nearly as fast.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 986 boxster S vs 987 vs 996



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:04 PM.