Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C2/turbo swaybar droplinks vs RS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2016, 03:47 PM
  #1  
ThomasT
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
ThomasT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default C2/turbo swaybar droplinks vs RS?

Has anyone really compared the C2/turbo(96434307101/96434307201) front droplinks with the RS ones(96434307281/96434307181)?

What is the difference?

.
Old 11-27-2016, 09:20 AM
  #2  
ThomasT
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
ThomasT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Is it really no one that have change their droplinks? Is the RS ones really shorter, or whats the differens?

.
Old 11-27-2016, 09:27 AM
  #3  
Vandit
Nordschleife Master
 
Vandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

They're likely the same structurally but dimensionally I think the RS piece is shorter and it definitely has the bend in a different spot compared to the C2 piece. Not sure what the end goal was (i.e. create clearance to brake line, position swaybar differently in relation to rest of suspension, etc.).
Old 11-27-2016, 10:10 AM
  #4  
Goughary
Race Car
 
Goughary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: fairfield, CT
Posts: 4,821
Likes: 0
Received 395 Likes on 262 Posts
Default

I think the difference was due to the difference in the upright.

There are plenty of good aftermarket drop links on the market. One is as good as the other. Just decide if you want partly solid or solid with rod ends...difference is slight and you get just a bit more noise with the rod ends links



Quick Reply: C2/turbo swaybar droplinks vs RS?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:05 PM.