Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Informal Ducktail Poll

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-12-2017, 02:34 AM
  #16  
Rainmaker
Advanced
 
Rainmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New York/Manila, Philippines
Posts: 60
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Has anyone tried these guys? Thinking of ordering one from them....
Old 12-13-2017, 08:12 PM
  #17  
HalV
Rennlist Member
 
HalV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: MN
Posts: 771
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Does anyone know the down-force difference between some of these ducktails and the stock C2/4 tail?
Old 12-13-2017, 11:50 PM
  #18  
911 jared
Rennlist Member
 
911 jared's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Southern Ca
Posts: 781
Received 208 Likes on 108 Posts
Default



Not the best photo, but you get the idea.
Old 12-14-2017, 09:55 AM
  #19  
cobalt
Rennlist Member
 
cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22,171
Received 1,931 Likes on 1,168 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HalV
Does anyone know the down-force difference between some of these ducktails and the stock C2/4 tail?
The tails don't add downforce as much as they reduce lift. The bi wing or wing tails used on the newer cars create downforce. The duck tail is actually less effective than the stock pop up tail and far less than the carrera RSA tail. Although the RSA tail is about 6 pounds heavier than the pop up tail.

Here is a commonly used and somewhat accurate chart
showing some basic comparisons.
Old 12-14-2017, 11:14 AM
  #20  
HalV
Rennlist Member
 
HalV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: MN
Posts: 771
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cobalt
The tails don't add downforce as much as they reduce lift. The bi wing or wing tails used on the newer cars create downforce. The duck tail is actually less effective than the stock pop up tail and far less than the carrera RSA tail. Although the RSA tail is about 6 pounds heavier than the pop up tail.

Here is a commonly used and somewhat accurate chart
Thanks Anthony. This info is very useful.
Old 12-18-2017, 04:31 PM
  #21  
elbeee964
Nordschleife Master
 
elbeee964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E. VA
Posts: 5,405
Received 74 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

How very odd (the charts, above).

When 'researching' my future car-to-buy back in cough'85cough, I happened on an OLD article from '73 in one of the library's US car magazine stacks. (Library: where one went before the internet.)
It was on Porsche's then-new duck tail option.
The magazine ran an instrument to measure rear spring deflection (lifting) at speed.
The deflection vs. speed chart showed similar as above for the 911 w/o tail.
The duct tail, otoh, followed the "w/o tail" curve till 50-60 mph, then plateaued to essentially a constant value from there on as speed grew.
Not that I'm doubting the chart above... It's all just... odd.
(Has someone, somewhere been feeding someone else whooey for charts?)

I remember that story (and may still have a copy filed away) because as a (much) younger engineer I found the chart compelling evidence of an elegant aero solution.
Now... who knows?

And I didn't pick up my first 911 till 14 years later. An '85. Time flies.
Old 12-18-2017, 09:22 PM
  #22  
elbeee964
Nordschleife Master
 
elbeee964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E. VA
Posts: 5,405
Received 74 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Huh -- still had a copy of that duck tail vs. lift article I mentioned above.

From Car and Driver, Feb., 1974:
(Sidebar to the larger article comparing a plain 911, 911S Targa, and 911S Carrera (w/ ducktail). Prices... $12,225, $15,670, & $15,045.)
And how about the cost of that factory duck tail -- $285!

Old 12-19-2017, 09:21 AM
  #23  
cobalt
Rennlist Member
 
cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22,171
Received 1,931 Likes on 1,168 Posts
Default

Rudimentary but worth a look.

​​​​​​
Old 12-19-2017, 09:40 AM
  #24  
dukmon
Rennlist Member
 
dukmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 685
Received 173 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Who offers the mechanical rear spoiler lid with the slight tail, similar to the Singers? Anyone?
Old 12-28-2017, 03:31 PM
  #25  
g60pops
Burning Brakes
 
g60pops's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dukmon
Who offers the mechanical rear spoiler lid with the slight tail, similar to the Singers? Anyone?
Techart offered a lip that was similar. Best bet would be used as no longer available new.
Old 12-28-2017, 04:01 PM
  #26  
Santa Cruz Red
Rennlist Member
 
Santa Cruz Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains
Posts: 211
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Check these guys out... pretty spendy but looks good. https://www.f-s-h.com/Rear-spoiler-S...-ST-conversion
Old 12-29-2017, 03:22 AM
  #27  
Rainmaker
Advanced
 
Rainmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New York/Manila, Philippines
Posts: 60
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm choosing between these two myself...
Old 12-29-2017, 07:13 AM
  #28  
rotorheadcase
Pro
 
rotorheadcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 560
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

They look to be made by the same manufacturer. Even the pics are very similar.
Old 02-13-2018, 09:40 PM
  #29  
PNine64
Pro
 
PNine64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default



Originally Posted by Rey Gunn
Any pics on the car? Leaning towards a stratton duck on mine. TIA
Hey man...sorry. Just saw your note.

PNine64
Old 03-07-2018, 02:36 PM
  #30  
Rey Gunn
Burning Brakes
 
Rey Gunn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 788
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by PNine64




Hey man...sorry. Just saw your note.

PNine64
Thanks for the pics. What grill fits on the duck? I went with the Stratton duck and now I'm looking for the grill to fit. Thanks in advance.


Quick Reply: Informal Ducktail Poll



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:12 AM.