Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

change proportioning valve? Or Adjustable Brake bias

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2016, 12:18 PM
  #16  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,241
Received 502 Likes on 345 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by panzerfaust
So what would be the most effective way to move some of the bias to the front on the m491 some where close to the NB 3.2 cars without resorting to twin MC and no booster? Does my car have a proportion valve that I can swap with another 911 or tinker with like the 964's? I don't want to over do it cuz u can spin like a top without warning if the rears lock up first.
From '84 M491 used a p/v.
yes you can safely remove it to get the bias curves that 930 have. There will still be more front bias than any 911 thru '84 had.
Old 02-05-2016, 12:23 PM
  #17  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,241
Received 502 Likes on 345 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by -nick
Thanks for bringing up this discussion. I'm putting it on my to-do list. Anyone with aftermarket springs/shocks is losing braking ability due to too much front bias. Less weight transfer to the front and the front tires will break loose more quickly. My wet weather braking is truly terrible.
Weight transfer does not depend on spring rates

It only correlates directly to acceleration rate, height of center of mass and total mass and inversely to wheelbase

In the wet negative acceleration is less so there is less weight transfer so more rear bias can be used
Old 02-05-2016, 12:29 PM
  #18  
-nick
Three Wheelin'
 
-nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cambridge/Boston, MA
Posts: 1,781
Received 104 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Yes, springs effect body roll/pitch and not weight transfer. I should be beaten with a mechanics book for that one!

Lowering the ride height is the influencing change. Though I don't know how much change in weight transfer the typical 1" height decrease makes.
Old 08-08-2016, 06:13 AM
  #19  
Mezger
Instructor
 
Mezger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Isle of Palms, SC - Munich, Germany
Posts: 187
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Maybe someone wants to enlighten me.
My 90 C2 with the 2 piston rears has in my opinion absolutely insufficient rear axle brake power.
My questions are as follows:
1. Will the 4 piston setup change my bias for the better
2. If staying with the two piston setup, what is the best way to go?

Thanks rennlister friends!
Old 08-08-2016, 06:20 AM
  #20  
alexjc4
Three Wheelin'
 
alexjc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

2 pot rears have more "power" than 4 pot rears (as in more rear bias)

However the 2 pot rears are limited by their thermal capacity which will show up in rear tough conditions, on track etc. You may find you boil the brake fluid or you may just consume the rear pads more quickly. You could try and fit the best brake fluid you can afford and some pads that can handle the heat and see how you go. Depends on your usage though.

If you genuinely just want more rear bias/"power" in the rear brakes you can take the proportioning valve out and stay with the 2 pot C2 rears. But C4 rears will reduce the rear bias and thereby reduce rear axle brake "power".
Old 08-08-2016, 06:47 AM
  #21  
Mezger
Instructor
 
Mezger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Isle of Palms, SC - Munich, Germany
Posts: 187
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hello Alex,

Thanks for your quick response.
According to what you just wrote the "best" setup would be utilization of C4 calipers without use of the rear proportioning valve, right?
Old 08-08-2016, 07:04 AM
  #22  
alexjc4
Three Wheelin'
 
alexjc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Yes, that would give you more rear bias and more thermal capacity. Brake bias is a matter of taste though, I know people that have tracked their cars heavily with C4 rears and the p/v still in place and been very happy.
Old 08-09-2016, 02:56 AM
  #23  
anto1150
Pro
 
anto1150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Abruzzo (ITALY)
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Best upgrade would be 993 rear calipers and swap the rear PV with a Tilton adjustable one.
As a general rule: the more the grip (dry track and sticky tyres), the less rear bias; as opposite, on road and less grippy conditions you need more rear byte.
If you change suspensions setup, harder suspensions call for more rear bias; softer setups need less rear brake.

Ciao

Name:  ForumRunner_20160809_075559.png
Views: 990
Size:  316.8 KB

Last edited by anto1150; 08-09-2016 at 03:13 AM.



Quick Reply: change proportioning valve? Or Adjustable Brake bias



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:40 AM.