Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

964 C4 light refurb

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2017, 04:45 PM
  #646  
John McM
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
John McM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 13,206
Received 567 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

Speaking of closing the case, this is a minor nightmare as no-one appears to do it the same way e.g. The 'modern' methods start with the through bolts but the workshop manual starts with the case peripheral fasteners. The reason this is important is that there is 45 minutes to put o rings in place and do up 30 plus fasteners and there are two competing priorities.

1. The through bolts control the area around the crankshaft and could impact on bearing clearances.

2. The peripheral fasteners control the case seal integrity.

On balance I prefer the modern method as I'm more concerned about bearing tolerances over the longer term.

Last edited by John McM; 05-31-2017 at 08:58 PM.
Old 05-31-2017, 04:55 PM
  #647  
John McM
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
John McM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 13,206
Received 567 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

The other nightmare is sealant choice. I will likely stick with the workshop manual spec of Loctite 574 due to its working time of 45 minutes. The Threebond product skins quite quickly in comparison.

Around the nose bearing there are so many choices. I've decided to use a light smear of Loctite 574 on the main area next to the oil channel entry, Dow Molykote 55 on the o ring and a light smear of Curil T on the edge that sits on the case edge. The leaking nose bearing appeared to have been installed completely dry so anything is an improvement.

Last edited by John McM; 06-03-2017 at 01:58 AM.
Old 05-31-2017, 10:27 PM
  #648  
C4inLA
Burning Brakes
 
C4inLA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: West Coast
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

That #8 bearing is quite the engineering feat. Are all the slots, holes for lubrication flow? It was interesting in the last months of my "little" project to sample all those sealants.. Add Moly 111 and the EP clutch parts grease and they all feel quite different between the thumb and finger. That Curil T has a unique feel. Closing the case, I'd be having dreams about it, happy dreams!

Last edited by C4inLA; 05-31-2017 at 10:30 PM. Reason: ,
Old 05-31-2017, 10:44 PM
  #649  
John McM
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
John McM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 13,206
Received 567 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C4inLA
That #8 bearing is quite the engineering feat. Are all the slots, holes for lubrication flow? It was interesting in the last months of my "little" project to sample all those sealants.. Add Moly 111 and the EP clutch parts grease and they all feel quite different between the thumb and finger. That Curil T has a unique feel. Closing the case, I'd be having dreams about it, happy dreams!
Oil enters through the side channel under pressure, circulates around the internal bearing surface which touches the crankshaft and flows back into the case. The two holes in the back are to allow oil that tries to escape the bearing area to flow back in the case as does the slotted relief channel by the O-ring.

I'm working out how to film the case closing. Right now, I'm thinking a Go-pro on 2 second frame grabs would equate to a minute on YouTube. Not an original idea but I'd like a record of it for posterity.
Old 06-04-2017, 12:01 AM
  #650  
John McM
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
John McM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 13,206
Received 567 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

The Case reseal is on a countdown to this time next week.

I'm often impatient so forced time to think and research is helping formulate a hopefully well thought out plan.

The big question throughout the teardown was how to reseal this to end up with a leak free engine, particularly the nose bearing area. Part of the process is understanding how Porsche engineers intended the oil system to work, then I can understand why people propose what they do and whether I'll go with it or not.

To better understand it I researched basic oil system theory. Wow, so much to contemplate. I didn't realise that the system design was so complicated. Basically the pump produced pressure forces oil along galleries where their size and part tolerances determine the flow and pressure drop at individual points e.g. If bearing tolerances are worn the pressure is lower as more oil is lost at the bearing face than intended. That's why a worn engine may show reduced pressure.

The other important point is that oil flows from high to low pressure zones and Porsche have created flow points to pressure drop zones, which keeps the oil going where it should be going. With respect to the nose bearing this is critical.

Last edited by John McM; 06-04-2017 at 05:37 AM.
Old 06-04-2017, 12:15 AM
  #651  
John McM
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
John McM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 13,206
Received 567 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

What this means is that I no longer think I should interfere with the wider bearing area as this is part of the pressure drop zone i.e. The more pressure drop areas I block off the less the pressure will drop and flow where intended. What I will do is lightly coat the immediate area around the high pressure feed area to minimise the oil entering the bearing exterior but otherwise I will let Porsches design do its work where the o ring and nose bearing seal are the main defence against oil leaving the case if the pressure drop points are overloaded.

Last edited by John McM; 06-04-2017 at 05:39 AM.
Old 06-04-2017, 12:37 AM
  #652  
John McM
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
John McM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 13,206
Received 567 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

Pics say it all
Attached Images       
Old 06-04-2017, 12:50 AM
  #653  
John McM
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
John McM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 13,206
Received 567 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

Old and new, albeit the new ones were made in 1997 and stocked in 8/98. That's one heck of a carry period. I hope the new ones are Aluminum. I'm over Magnesium parts. USD 82 each.
Attached Images   

Last edited by John McM; 06-10-2017 at 01:50 AM.
Old 06-10-2017, 03:18 AM
  #654  
John McM
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
John McM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 13,206
Received 567 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

Proof of concept with the sealant method. It appears conclusive that the best result comes from spreading a thin layer over the area with a sponge. Putting more or having a thick layer just ends up with sealant where you don't necessarily want it.

Three areas with a slightly different application method in each
Attached Images    
Old 06-10-2017, 03:19 AM
  #655  
John McM
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
John McM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 13,206
Received 567 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

Result in each area on the side of the case which had the sealant on it.
Attached Images    
Old 06-10-2017, 03:21 AM
  #656  
John McM
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
John McM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 13,206
Received 567 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

Side view of the same case side. Clear seepage inside the case with the bead method
Attached Images    
Old 06-10-2017, 03:24 AM
  #657  
John McM
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
John McM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 13,206
Received 567 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

Other case half. Nice coverage with each method but again the bead method leaves too much surplus.
Attached Images    
Old 06-10-2017, 03:29 AM
  #658  
John McM
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
John McM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 13,206
Received 567 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

The conclusion is to use the sponge spread method with care as to how much is on the inside edge. While Loctite 574 shouldn't dry in open air areas I found globs on my engine while dismantling it so I don't think it's license to go mad.
Attached Images    
Old 06-10-2017, 04:24 PM
  #659  
C4inLA
Burning Brakes
 
C4inLA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: West Coast
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

John,

Is the center of pic on post 655 the spong?

As I wish I had a map of how all oil flows through the case, were you able to blow air through various oil routes in case halves after cleaning kind of thing? Your keeping all bearings throughout other than #8?

Fun stuff.
Old 06-10-2017, 06:31 PM
  #660  
John McM
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
John McM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 13,206
Received 567 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

Sponge method is this photo. It's really more about spreading the sealant the way you want it to go than sponging excess off the area.

Btw this was not Loctite 574. I used a past use by date bottle of Wurth Flange Sealant. I'd be worried if my 574 came out with streaks of colour in it.
Attached Images  


Quick Reply: 964 C4 light refurb



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:11 AM.