Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Specialist Components 964 kit - any real world experience?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-2015, 04:45 AM
  #46  
racoguy
Racer
 
racoguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Auckland NZ
Posts: 366
Received 148 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John McM
John, booked in at Torque Performance for Friday morning at 8am. Robin thinks it will take about an hour. I'd like to record runs for both Standard and Wong chips. Can we meet there with your ECU?
Should be able to, flick me a PM and I'll send you my mobile.
Old 01-14-2015, 05:18 AM
  #47  
LM964
Rennlist Member
 
LM964's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bucks, Herts, Beds Tri-Border, UK
Posts: 1,134
Received 84 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by evoderby
Fuel flow is a square root function of pressure, therefore uprating fuel pressure from 3.0Bar to 4.5Bar increases flow from 440cc/min to 540cc/min.
Ah, got it...

Interesting though, and certainly looking forward to John's results and feedback.
Old 01-15-2015, 05:08 PM
  #48  
John McM
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
John McM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 13,206
Received 566 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

Base line Dyno run completed. Thanks to Racoguy we were able to do two sets of runs, one with the standard ECU and one with a Steve Wong chip.

These are baseline results and I don't want to get into a long discussion about a subject I know little about so I won't post the curve to initiate that however I can share the following:

1. The Steve Wong chip added 20kW power at the rear wheels

2. The AFR for both standard and Steve Wong chip are solid. The standard one is ~ 11.8:1 at 4,800 rpm plus whereas the Steve Wong Chip is 11.3:1. No danger of leaning out there.
Attached Images   
Old 01-15-2015, 05:12 PM
  #49  
911Jetta
Rennlist Member
 
911Jetta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 7,214
Received 485 Likes on 278 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John McM
...The Steve Wong chip added 20kW power at the rear wheels...
Wong! Wong! Wong!
Old 01-15-2015, 05:19 PM
  #50  
John McM
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
John McM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 13,206
Received 566 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911Jetta
Wong! Wong! Wong!
Yes. Finally put that debate to bed. A great result.

Old 01-15-2015, 05:44 PM
  #51  
SuperUser
Three Wheelin'
 
SuperUser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,982
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911Jetta
Wong! Wong! Wong!
No kidding
Old 01-15-2015, 06:06 PM
  #52  
-nick
Three Wheelin'
 
-nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cambridge/Boston, MA
Posts: 1,781
Received 104 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

John,
Steve had told me that he tunes the afr to hit a constant 13.0-13.2 at WOT. Possibly your wot switch is not getting triggered? I'm having rich-mix problems and log mid 11's at wot in 3rd. With the wot switch disconnected, I got down to 11.2 and I could smell the rich exhaust even on the highway. Next on my checklist is to have the ecu tested, my cabrio definitely had some water leaks in its past.

My before/after Steve W chip set for 93 octane and stock exhaust only saw 6hp and 5ft-lbs at the wheels on a Mustang dyno. I'm guessing that your cup pipe allowed for the extra power and the Wong chip was just able to take advantage of it.

I'd love to see the dyno curves if you're willing to send a pm/email copy. Thanks for this info!
Old 01-16-2015, 01:27 AM
  #53  
Raceboy
Three Wheelin'
 
Raceboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 1,631
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

20 kw is a good estimation on stock engine as we got 156 rwkw with completely stock engine (including stock old cat) and switched to VEMS and after some tuning managed to get 172 rwkw.

CUP pipe and 200cpi cat would make it more and also stock injectors are pretty much maxxed even with stock engine...

Old 01-16-2015, 01:31 AM
  #54  
John McM
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
John McM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 13,206
Received 566 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

Install over. It took about 5 hours. Much of that was spent on the injectors. It started first time and idles as normal.

I only took it for a short drive around the block. It seems to be drivable with the supplied base map except it can't as yet cope with the LWF. I'll clean the ISV but I expect it needs a tweaking. I know it's possible as the Steve Wong chip solved that.

Old 01-16-2015, 09:37 AM
  #55  
jeremybu
8th Gear
 
jeremybu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is it possible to bypass the ISV completely and have the ECU control idle stability?
Old 01-16-2015, 04:52 PM
  #56  
Vandit
Nordschleife Master
 
Vandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

It's not like the ISV functions autonomously...
Old 01-18-2015, 05:32 AM
  #57  
StanUK951
Burning Brakes
 
StanUK951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: London, England
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well done John!

The SC kit is on my list. Sad to hear it doesn't handle LWF out of the box - the Wong chip comes programmed to do handle a standard dual mass or LWF so would think this could be built into the kit for the future?

I'm also trying to find out if I can maintain OBC functionality on the tach, as I like this feature...!
Old 01-18-2015, 05:51 AM
  #58  
John McM
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
John McM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 13,206
Received 566 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

Unfortunately I have no idea where to start with the LWF problem.

This was the response Steve Wong gave to another Rennlister about the LWF solution

With regards with the LWF, much research and testing has gone into finding the permanent solution to this problem that has plagued owners for years. The solution was finally solved by implementing part of the coding solution of the European RS, that came from the factory with the LWF, and also would stall without a special chip coding. The fact is with the chip I have that is modified for a standard 993 with a LWF, your car will idle no differently than if it were a European RS, with a slightly higher idle of +100 rpm, and should not stall unless you engine has other mechanical issues such as air leaks. So far it has worked well for everyone who has installed it, and was the only way they could fix their stalling even after trying all kinds of other proposed solutions of the past. If you still have any residual idle issues, taking the car to a Porsche service center with a Bosch hammer, PST2, or PIWIS tester and having a 5 minute idle adaptation performed should take care of any remaining calibration.
Old 01-18-2015, 05:54 AM
  #59  
John McM
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
John McM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 13,206
Received 566 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

First step I suppose is to download the Typhoon software and learn what it can do.

Fortunately I have just bought a Cayman R and have a DD while I sort this out
Old 01-18-2015, 06:42 AM
  #60  
Duck
Burning Brakes
 
Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wilmington, NC USA
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

My understanding is that you will need to raise the idle slightly, but also kick in fueling earlier when the revs drop. I am not sure how this works or what map (is their an idle map?) but I believe you need to raise this value as well as the idle.


Quick Reply: Specialist Components 964 kit - any real world experience?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:32 AM.