Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

favourite mods and least favourite mods

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-2014, 10:31 AM
  #31  
mf_rsr
Pro
 
mf_rsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 680
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Phew...have already put single pulley conversion on my santa clause list and posted it :-)
Old 10-22-2014, 11:50 AM
  #32  
Goughary
Race Car
 
Goughary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: fairfield, CT
Posts: 4,821
Likes: 0
Received 395 Likes on 262 Posts
Default

Mf_rsr, just for giggles, stick a multi meter on your battery just before you make the change, measure the voltage and amperage at 1k, 2k, 3k and 4k rpm. If you find that it's way lower below 3k and all the same above 3k, you will notice the difference. This was my experience.

As to throttle response, I was getting a weak spark at below 3k rpm, so the throttle response issue was only when the revs were low. And the driveability issues were only noticeable in "around town" type driving, anywhere where the car was naturally at below 3k rpm. But do a test with yours and see if you end up w the same issue.

Also, I have the single belt pulley that needs a home, so if you are looking to upgrade and if you are in the states, pm me if you want to buy mine. We made a nifty pulley reinforcement as well that I will send along with it.
Old 10-22-2014, 12:25 PM
  #33  
mf_rsr
Pro
 
mf_rsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 680
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the offer goughry...im in the UK however. I'll try and get some details from rob and gary as well. A key development area for me is actually low down throttle response and speed...so VRAM, valves and cams are on the menu at some point. I was concerned when I read your post but as ever there appears to be conflicting views....
Old 10-22-2014, 05:08 PM
  #34  
Mr.Alex
Three Wheelin'
 
Mr.Alex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

A lot of good suggestions here. I'm going to say that overhauling both front control arm bushings was a really nice improvement in terms of feel. Steering is a bit tighter, and on the twisties, the car seems more poised.

H4's should be a must if you drive at night, plus they really suit the car in terms of looks, whereas the H5's look really outdated after age.
Old 10-22-2014, 06:56 PM
  #35  
creaturecat
Burning Brakes
 
creaturecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Vancouver B C
Posts: 1,057
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Headlight relays, coupled with the H 4's. Best bang for the buck, the relays.
Bosch lens, if available.
Canadian content, re: H 4's - the bonus of city lights, such that you do not have to use the fogs for DRL's.
Old 10-23-2014, 03:44 AM
  #36  
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
RL Technical Advisor
 
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,871
Likes: 0
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mikke_Possu
Is it so that those are only available for G50, not for G64?
Yes, thats correct.

The factory did make some very special close-ratio gears for the 964 C4 Lightweight rally car, but these are VERY VERY difficult & expensive to acquire and the gear choices were quite limited.
Old 10-23-2014, 07:06 AM
  #37  
ras62
Burning Brakes
 
ras62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Cheshire UK
Posts: 782
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Another one running with a single belt and no problems.
I am not sure why this would cause a problem when it works just fine on the RS? The only electrical differences are the RS having a smaller battery! and the lack of a heated rear screen.
Old 10-23-2014, 07:51 AM
  #38  
PAOLOP
Rennlist Member
 
PAOLOP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Parma, ITALY
Posts: 417
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
Yes, thats correct.

The factory did make some very special close-ratio gears for the 964 C4 Lightweight rally car, but these are VERY VERY difficult & expensive to acquire and the gear choices were quite limited.
I think that the gear ratios C4 Vs C4 Lightweight are the same, the difference are in the R&P: the C4L had the 8:37, the C4 has the 9:31.
I got the 8:37's from Weissach!!!!!!
Paolo
Old 10-23-2014, 09:28 AM
  #39  
koenig_roland
Burning Brakes
 
koenig_roland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mainhatten / Frankfurt
Posts: 1,013
Received 142 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PAOLOP
I got the 8:37's from Weissach!!!!!!
Paolo
is it possible to shorten the C4 gears with a R&P?

8:37 is to short in my opinion, but the classic 8:32 could be fine...
Old 10-23-2014, 11:11 AM
  #40  
PAOLOP
Rennlist Member
 
PAOLOP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Parma, ITALY
Posts: 417
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by koenig_roland
is it possible to shorten the C4 gears with a R&P?

8:37 is to short in my opinion, but the classic 8:32 could be fine...
Yes, could be fine a 8:32 but this for a C4 do not exist !! R&P's for G64 are different from G50 (see PET)
Old 10-23-2014, 03:11 PM
  #41  
koenig_roland
Burning Brakes
 
koenig_roland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mainhatten / Frankfurt
Posts: 1,013
Received 142 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PAOLOP
Yes, could be fine a 8:32 but this for a C4 do not exist !! R&P's for G64 are different from G50 (see PET)
what`s the new top-speed with your R&P? 200km/h? That`s quite slow for europe, isn`t it?..
Old 10-23-2014, 05:58 PM
  #42  
greg1990964
Three Wheelin'
 
greg1990964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boston Burbs.
Posts: 1,334
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Looks like this has changed to a thread about gear ratios
Old 10-23-2014, 06:28 PM
  #43  
Captain Ahab Jr.
Pro
 
Captain Ahab Jr.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

favourite is weight reduction on my car, least favourite is weight reduction on me
Old 10-23-2014, 08:40 PM
  #44  
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
RL Technical Advisor
 
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,871
Likes: 0
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PAOLOP
I think that the gear ratios C4 Vs C4 Lightweight are the same, the difference are in the R&P: the C4L had the 8:37, the C4 has the 9:31.
I got the 8:37's from Weissach!!!!!!
Paolo
Hi Paolo,

We recently re-geared a genuine factory C4 Lightweight and that's how I found out those cars had different close-ratio gears, not the street C4 ones.
Old 10-23-2014, 09:59 PM
  #45  
mf_rsr
Pro
 
mf_rsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 680
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by greg1990964
Looks like this has changed to a thread about gear ratios
And that is what is amazing about rennlist :-) Now we know C4 lightweight gear ratios [thumbs up]

Good to see it back to rude health after the recent slanging matches!


Quick Reply: favourite mods and least favourite mods



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:40 PM.