Great 964 WHEELS FS Thread
#46
15mm on the front
you can probably get away without spacers for the rear. Or use a 7mm spacers to bring out the wheels to sit more flush with fender. 255 tires for the rear
#47
Front works,
for the rear, you will need 5mm spacers. (47mm effective offset). 47mm offset is the sweet spot for 10" wheels
I had almost same setup in the past. ran 285 tires on the rear. it was with stock ride height tho. if lowered, I would just run 265 all day without problem.
#48
Thanks for that. My current wheels I think are Cup1 reps. They have JIL (I think) stamped (kind of reverse stamped the letters are lifted), how much lighter would proper Porsche Cup1s likely weigh than these ? Which are the ones I'm questioning.
How much difference to the handling would the spacers make ?
How much difference to the handling would the spacers make ?
#49
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
The "JWL" (Japan Light Wheel Alloy) stamp is a compilation of standards defined by the Japanese Government to ensure the vehicle's safety for aluminum road wheels. Every wheel put to their market must be tested to meet JWL standards before a wheel can be put out to market in Japan and it's for this reason the wheels will have this stamped on them. It's not a manufacturers mark.
#50
Thanks for the help in all of this guys.
This set of wheels won't work on a 964 then because they'll stick out too far correct?
8 x 17 fronts with 9 x 17 rears
Offset Fronts : 30.4
Offset Rear : 17.7
This set of wheels won't work on a 964 then because they'll stick out too far correct?
8 x 17 fronts with 9 x 17 rears
Offset Fronts : 30.4
Offset Rear : 17.7
Front works,
for the rear, you will need 5mm spacers. (47mm effective offset). 47mm offset is the sweet spot for 10" wheels
I had almost same setup in the past. ran 285 tires on the rear. it was with stock ride height tho. if lowered, I would just run 265 all day without problem.
for the rear, you will need 5mm spacers. (47mm effective offset). 47mm offset is the sweet spot for 10" wheels
I had almost same setup in the past. ran 285 tires on the rear. it was with stock ride height tho. if lowered, I would just run 265 all day without problem.
#51
Drifting
Thread Starter
As a general guide look for front ET50+ and rear ET47+
#52
Three Wheelin'
Yea, I found a great set of CUP 1 wheels only to find those offset numbers........:^(
#54
Drifting
Thread Starter
#55
good luck, I'm sure you'll find the right set for you!
#56
Come on you BBS geeks, show us what you got!
I'm an aspiring geek, help a fella out...
I've looked and found so many varying opinions I am a bit lost as to suitable fitment for 18" BBS LM. RS ride height, moderate camber. I'm not interested in rolling the fenders.
I've heard LM099 (18 x 8.5 ET6) and LM144 (18 x 10 ET50) work. Is there truth in this? I'd imagine LM 141 (18 x 8 ET 50) and LM 142 (18 x 9.5 ET 55) would be a better fitment?
Are there other LM fitment options are there to be had? And I mean 'had' not the rare as rocking horse poo wheels
I'm an aspiring geek, help a fella out...
I've looked and found so many varying opinions I am a bit lost as to suitable fitment for 18" BBS LM. RS ride height, moderate camber. I'm not interested in rolling the fenders.
I've heard LM099 (18 x 8.5 ET6) and LM144 (18 x 10 ET50) work. Is there truth in this? I'd imagine LM 141 (18 x 8 ET 50) and LM 142 (18 x 9.5 ET 55) would be a better fitment?
Are there other LM fitment options are there to be had? And I mean 'had' not the rare as rocking horse poo wheels
#57
Drifting
Thread Starter
[QUOTE="pcarplayer;11467367"]
I've heard LM099 (18 x 8.5 ET6) and LM144 (18 x 10 ET50) work. Is there truth in this? [/QUOTE
Front ET6? Rears will work fine, although your want a small 5mm shim to bring em out a bit more.
[QUOTE="pcarplayer;11467367"
I'd imagine LM 141 (18 x 8 ET 50) and LM 142 (18 x 9.5 ET 55) would be a better fitment?[/QUOTE]
These work fine also although you may want to add spacers to fill out the arches.
Not better, both seem fine. Just depends on your preference for wider wheels.
I've heard LM099 (18 x 8.5 ET6) and LM144 (18 x 10 ET50) work. Is there truth in this? [/QUOTE
Front ET6? Rears will work fine, although your want a small 5mm shim to bring em out a bit more.
[QUOTE="pcarplayer;11467367"
I'd imagine LM 141 (18 x 8 ET 50) and LM 142 (18 x 9.5 ET 55) would be a better fitment?[/QUOTE]
These work fine also although you may want to add spacers to fill out the arches.
Not better, both seem fine. Just depends on your preference for wider wheels.
#58
#60
Today buy for my 964 turbo-look Kerscher wheels (speedline) 18 front 8.5 ET 48, rear 10 ET 35.
Question: nice they will stand, suitable size? and what size tire to buy? Thank you all for your help!
Question: nice they will stand, suitable size? and what size tire to buy? Thank you all for your help!