Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Great 964 WHEELS FS Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-2014, 02:50 PM
  #46  
FlyinTomato
Banned
 
FlyinTomato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: NNJ
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by roadiesean
Will these fit my 1989 C4 ?

7.5J x 17 ET (mm) 65 Part Number: 993 362 124 00

9J x 17 ET (mm) 55 Part Number: 993 362 128 00
Yes, with spacers.

15mm on the front

you can probably get away without spacers for the rear. Or use a 7mm spacers to bring out the wheels to sit more flush with fender. 255 tires for the rear
Old 06-24-2014, 02:56 PM
  #47  
FlyinTomato
Banned
 
FlyinTomato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: NNJ
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MusicMadMike
Oh great understanders of offsets and wheels would this configuration work under a NB 964

8Jx18, ET50
10Jx18, ET52

I still don't understand

Front works,

for the rear, you will need 5mm spacers. (47mm effective offset). 47mm offset is the sweet spot for 10" wheels

I had almost same setup in the past. ran 285 tires on the rear. it was with stock ride height tho. if lowered, I would just run 265 all day without problem.
Old 06-24-2014, 03:23 PM
  #48  
roadiesean
Advanced
 
roadiesean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for that. My current wheels I think are Cup1 reps. They have JIL (I think) stamped (kind of reverse stamped the letters are lifted), how much lighter would proper Porsche Cup1s likely weigh than these ? Which are the ones I'm questioning.

How much difference to the handling would the spacers make ?
Old 06-24-2014, 03:50 PM
  #49  
Andy Roe
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Andy Roe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bologna, Italy
Posts: 3,605
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The "JWL" (Japan Light Wheel Alloy) stamp is a compilation of standards defined by the Japanese Government to ensure the vehicle's safety for aluminum road wheels. Every wheel put to their market must be tested to meet JWL standards before a wheel can be put out to market in Japan and it's for this reason the wheels will have this stamped on them. It's not a manufacturers mark.
Old 06-24-2014, 06:03 PM
  #50  
MusicMadMike
Racer
 
MusicMadMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oxted, Surrey, UK
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks for the help in all of this guys.

This set of wheels won't work on a 964 then because they'll stick out too far correct?

8 x 17 fronts with 9 x 17 rears
Offset Fronts : 30.4
Offset Rear : 17.7

Originally Posted by FlyinTomato
Front works,

for the rear, you will need 5mm spacers. (47mm effective offset). 47mm offset is the sweet spot for 10" wheels

I had almost same setup in the past. ran 285 tires on the rear. it was with stock ride height tho. if lowered, I would just run 265 all day without problem.
Old 06-24-2014, 07:07 PM
  #51  
BLACK-BETTY
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
BLACK-BETTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MusicMadMike
Thanks for the help in all of this guys. This set of wheels won't work on a 964 then because they'll stick out too far correct? 8 x 17 fronts with 9 x 17 rears Offset Fronts : 30.4 Offset Rear : 17.7
Correct, those will stick out way too far. It's always better to have high offset numbers and ad spacers.

As a general guide look for front ET50+ and rear ET47+
Old 06-24-2014, 07:29 PM
  #52  
abarthguy
Three Wheelin'
 
abarthguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sunny SoCal
Posts: 1,523
Received 283 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Yea, I found a great set of CUP 1 wheels only to find those offset numbers........:^(
Old 06-25-2014, 03:19 AM
  #53  
Runtothehills
Racer
 
Runtothehills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Still waiting on a price on the BBS E28s....
Old 06-25-2014, 04:08 AM
  #54  
BLACK-BETTY
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
BLACK-BETTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Runtothehills
Still waiting on a price on the BBS E28s....
Soon, been away. I'll have them in front of me next week for new pics and a price.
Old 06-25-2014, 09:01 PM
  #55  
dsan
Racer
 
dsan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Southern GA
Posts: 350
Received 45 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BLACK-BETTY
No such thing as wrong, as you say. For the record - no bad blood


Originally Posted by abarthguy
Yea, I found a great set of CUP 1 wheels only to find those offset numbers........:^(
I ran into that a few times myself. Just when you think you found the "right" set.....................the search continues doesn't it

good luck, I'm sure you'll find the right set for you!
Old 06-26-2014, 07:16 AM
  #56  
pcarplayer
Burning Brakes
 
pcarplayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Come on you BBS geeks, show us what you got!

I'm an aspiring geek, help a fella out...

I've looked and found so many varying opinions I am a bit lost as to suitable fitment for 18" BBS LM. RS ride height, moderate camber. I'm not interested in rolling the fenders.

I've heard LM099 (18 x 8.5 ET6) and LM144 (18 x 10 ET50) work. Is there truth in this? I'd imagine LM 141 (18 x 8 ET 50) and LM 142 (18 x 9.5 ET 55) would be a better fitment?

Are there other LM fitment options are there to be had? And I mean 'had' not the rare as rocking horse poo wheels
Old 06-26-2014, 08:26 AM
  #57  
BLACK-BETTY
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
BLACK-BETTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

[QUOTE="pcarplayer;11467367"]

I've heard LM099 (18 x 8.5 ET6) and LM144 (18 x 10 ET50) work. Is there truth in this? [/QUOTE

Front ET6? Rears will work fine, although your want a small 5mm shim to bring em out a bit more.

[QUOTE="pcarplayer;11467367"
I'd imagine LM 141 (18 x 8 ET 50) and LM 142 (18 x 9.5 ET 55) would be a better fitment?[/QUOTE]

These work fine also although you may want to add spacers to fill out the arches.

Not better, both seem fine. Just depends on your preference for wider wheels.
Old 06-26-2014, 03:42 PM
  #58  
pcarplayer
Burning Brakes
 
pcarplayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BLACK-BETTY
Originally Posted by pcarplayer

I've heard LM099 (18 x 8.5 ET6) and LM144 (18 x 10 ET50) work. Is there truth in this?
Front ET6? Rears will work fine, although your want a small 5mm shim to bring em out a bit more.
Oops, thanks Frank. That is LM099 (18 x 8.5 ET56). I'm guessing you worked that out already?
Old 06-27-2014, 02:28 PM
  #59  
GT TWO
Racer
 
GT TWO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: www.cagedcar.com
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I will have some cup1s from a 964 turbo if anyone's interested.

Just bought some used RH speedline reps!!
Old 06-27-2014, 03:49 PM
  #60  
Malakut911
Intermediate
 
Malakut911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Moscow
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Today buy for my 964 turbo-look Kerscher wheels (speedline) 18 front 8.5 ET 48, rear 10 ET 35.
Question: nice they will stand, suitable size? and what size tire to buy? Thank you all for your help!


Quick Reply: Great 964 WHEELS FS Thread



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:08 AM.